Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Attorney General Garland: Minneapolis Police Probe Necessary
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ThatRobGuy" data-source="post: 75908988" data-attributes="member: 123415"><p>I don't know if that's a safe bet to assume...</p><p></p><p>Even if it was, sometimes that could have a negative impact on departments that don't have the same particular sets of problems.</p><p></p><p>For the obvious ones (like there shouldn't ever be 4 cops ganging up on an unarmed woman and putting her in a choke hold) those should be blanket policies.</p><p></p><p>But some more granular issues exist that aren't the same everywhere.</p><p></p><p>There are tools within any profession, that can be abused, and when you cater policies to the worst possible bad actors, and restrict the tools based on what they may abuse, you run the risk of making the job harder for everyone else who may not be abusing the current system.</p><p></p><p>For instance, if there was one person at the office who was going to adult websites on their computer at work...sure, a blanket policy of "all employees need to get pre-approval to open Chrome, and wait for an HR person to be available to come over and stand behind you while you search for something" would address the problem with that bad actor... however, it'd make the job a whole lot harder for the majority of people who aren't abusing the PC privileges at work.</p><p></p><p>Or, in the Medical field...sure, you could weed out the few shady doctors who are recommending un-needed procedures to line their pockets by requiring that Doctors need to get insurance pre-approval for every single thing they do/prescribe... but that's certainly going to make things less efficient and a bigger hassle for the majority of honest doctors who just want to prescribe amoxycillin to a patient for an ear infection without having to spend hours on the phone with an insurance rep to get it approved.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ThatRobGuy, post: 75908988, member: 123415"] I don't know if that's a safe bet to assume... Even if it was, sometimes that could have a negative impact on departments that don't have the same particular sets of problems. For the obvious ones (like there shouldn't ever be 4 cops ganging up on an unarmed woman and putting her in a choke hold) those should be blanket policies. But some more granular issues exist that aren't the same everywhere. There are tools within any profession, that can be abused, and when you cater policies to the worst possible bad actors, and restrict the tools based on what they may abuse, you run the risk of making the job harder for everyone else who may not be abusing the current system. For instance, if there was one person at the office who was going to adult websites on their computer at work...sure, a blanket policy of "all employees need to get pre-approval to open Chrome, and wait for an HR person to be available to come over and stand behind you while you search for something" would address the problem with that bad actor... however, it'd make the job a whole lot harder for the majority of people who aren't abusing the PC privileges at work. Or, in the Medical field...sure, you could weed out the few shady doctors who are recommending un-needed procedures to line their pockets by requiring that Doctors need to get insurance pre-approval for every single thing they do/prescribe... but that's certainly going to make things less efficient and a bigger hassle for the majority of honest doctors who just want to prescribe amoxycillin to a patient for an ear infection without having to spend hours on the phone with an insurance rep to get it approved. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Attorney General Garland: Minneapolis Police Probe Necessary
Top
Bottom