• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Atheists & Abortion

shadow2

Member
Feb 12, 2019
14
8
27
BC
✟23,417.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Female
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Sure. I think abortion is sometimes morally acceptable, other times not. During the first trimester of pregnancy I think it is virtually always acceptable. In the second trimester I think it is only acceptable if there is a health risk, a major deformation in the fetus, or in the case of conception by rape - I would argue that a woman should get an abortion as soon as she knows she is pregnant if she does not want to carry the child. In the third trimester I think abortion is usually wrong (unless there is an extenuating and major health risk to the mother), since the child could likely exist outside the mother's womb at that point. A c-section would be a better option.

I do believe that no woman would really want to harm her child, so I have little issue with deferring to the judgement of a mother to decide when she should like to bring a life into the world.

Also do keep in mind that I do not speak for all atheists at all, everyone has their own views on this issue and our views are of course influenced by our culture and society.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Occams Barber
Upvote 0

eleos1954

God is Love
Site Supporter
Nov 14, 2017
11,307
6,590
Utah
✟897,435.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Sure. I think abortion is sometimes morally acceptable, other times not. During the first trimester of pregnancy I think it is virtually always acceptable. In the second trimester I think it is only acceptable if there is a health risk, a major deformation in the fetus, or in the case of conception by rape - I would argue that a woman should get an abortion as soon as she knows she is pregnant if she does not want to carry the child. In the third trimester I think abortion is usually wrong (unless there is an extenuating and major health risk to the mother), since the child could likely exist outside the mother's womb at that point. A c-section would be a better option.

I do believe that no woman would really want to harm her child, so I have little issue with deferring to the judgement of a mother to decide when she should like to bring a life into the world.

Also do keep in mind that I do not speak for all atheists at all, everyone has their own views on this issue and our views are of course influenced by our culture and society.

Thank you for your response.
 
Upvote 0

PreviouslySeeking...

Well-Known Member
May 9, 2017
646
680
51
Seattle
✟100,757.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Married
Well, not an atheist but close enough.

Abortion is a medical procedure that is acceptable as long as it is medically ethical. I do not approach it as a moral issue if the fetus isn't viable. If the fetus is viable, the needs of the woman carrying the fetus still come first.

To be clear, I have no issue with any abortion a woman wishes to have as long as her doctor believes it to be medically appropriate.

My reasoning? Pragmatism. Bodily autonomy.
 
Upvote 0

PreviouslySeeking...

Well-Known Member
May 9, 2017
646
680
51
Seattle
✟100,757.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Married
Well, not an atheist but close enough.

Abortion is a medical procedure that is acceptable as long as it is medically ethical. I do not approach it as a moral issue if the fetus isn't viable. If the fetus is viable, the needs of the woman carrying the fetus still come first.

To be clear, I have no issue with any abortion a woman wishes to have as long as her doctor believes it to be medically appropriate.

My reasoning? Pragmatism. Bodily autonomy.
 
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

[redacted]
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
23,452
19,345
✟1,544,046.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Would like to hear from atheists on the what is/are their stance(s) are on abortion and the reasoning of their stance(s). Not intended to be a debate, just interested in the viewpoints.
My stance is based on bodily autonomy/property rights. The state is not the owner of a woman’s body, she is. As the fetus (no, I will not even respond to semantic quibbles on terminology) is dependent on the body of the woman her rights win out. This is less than ideal for all concerned but biology leaves us inequality that we cannot currently change.
 
Upvote 0

jayem

Naturalist
Jun 24, 2003
15,429
7,166
74
St. Louis, MO.
✟426,066.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I'm less pro-choice than I am anti-criminalization. I can understand that terminating a pregnancy for less than medical reasons (either maternal or fetal. Or if the pregnancy resulted from a sexual assault) can be seen as morally suspect. But using the police power of the state to criminalize it at all stages of pregnancy is simply a worse evil. It's just way too authoritarian.

For legal purposes, I support a 24 week threshold. Up to 24 weeks of gestational age, abortion should be left as a private medical decision between doctor and patient. After 24 weeks, the state can limit abortion to maternal or fetal health reasons.
 
Upvote 0

holo

former Christian
Dec 24, 2003
8,992
751
✟92,794.00
Country
Norway
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
I am principally opposed to abortion because I've yet to see solid arguments for when the fetus becomes a person. It's obviously hard to see a cluster of a few cells as a person, but we can't make important moral decisions on whether or not it "feels like" a human being. Either it is, or it isn't.
 
Upvote 0

frankieberg1985

Active Member
Feb 17, 2019
119
20
40
Lena
✟25,953.00
Country
Norway
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
I am principally opposed to abortion because I've yet to see solid arguments for when the fetus becomes a person. It's obviously hard to see a cluster of a few cells as a person, but we can't make important moral decisions on whether or not it "feels like" a human being. Either it is, or it isn't.

Mhm, but after the intimate relation you have already started it, that`s what I meant
 
Upvote 0