Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Asking for interpretations of this cladogram
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PsychoSarah" data-source="post: 72079382" data-attributes="member: 345531"><p>Based on the fact that Justatruthseeker thinks that human "races" are too different from each other to be the result of mutation, I'd say there's no way that he thinks that, say, panda bears and grizzly bears had a common ancestor. </p><p></p><p>Which is confusing, since he has said that he believes that mutations can create variations in color, etc. I haven't gotten him to explain how he thinks human "races" have differences that aren't covered by minor mutations, with him only saying stuff like "you can tell apart races by genetic testing", which is only kinda true, one can tell a person's basic traits via their genes, like their skin color, but I have no idea what that point is of that. Does he think minor mutations being common to large populations of people makes it impossible for it to be the result of mutation? I have no idea.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PsychoSarah, post: 72079382, member: 345531"] Based on the fact that Justatruthseeker thinks that human "races" are too different from each other to be the result of mutation, I'd say there's no way that he thinks that, say, panda bears and grizzly bears had a common ancestor. Which is confusing, since he has said that he believes that mutations can create variations in color, etc. I haven't gotten him to explain how he thinks human "races" have differences that aren't covered by minor mutations, with him only saying stuff like "you can tell apart races by genetic testing", which is only kinda true, one can tell a person's basic traits via their genes, like their skin color, but I have no idea what that point is of that. Does he think minor mutations being common to large populations of people makes it impossible for it to be the result of mutation? I have no idea. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Asking for interpretations of this cladogram
Top
Bottom