Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Asking for interpretations of this cladogram
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Justatruthseeker" data-source="post: 72077800" data-attributes="member: 332164"><p>What is there to dispute besides the fact they have inserted a non-existent common ancestor to bridge the gap between apes and humans?</p><p></p><p>This is your sole connecting point between the two species. Not just for humans, but for every single solitary tree for every single species that exists. At every single point of claimed split, a non-existent common ancestor is inserted.</p><p></p><p>Your entire belief system requires non-existent imaginary forms to bridge these distinct gaps between forms. Dispute what? Imagination and non-existence? It’s disputed by the fact not one can be found for any evolutionary tree for any species where this alleged split occurred. I need not dispute anything, the evidence does that itself....</p><p></p><p>You might as well claim fairies did it, since we are going to use imagination and non-existence as proof in your belief system. Follow your own saying under your avatar....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Justatruthseeker, post: 72077800, member: 332164"] What is there to dispute besides the fact they have inserted a non-existent common ancestor to bridge the gap between apes and humans? This is your sole connecting point between the two species. Not just for humans, but for every single solitary tree for every single species that exists. At every single point of claimed split, a non-existent common ancestor is inserted. Your entire belief system requires non-existent imaginary forms to bridge these distinct gaps between forms. Dispute what? Imagination and non-existence? It’s disputed by the fact not one can be found for any evolutionary tree for any species where this alleged split occurred. I need not dispute anything, the evidence does that itself.... You might as well claim fairies did it, since we are going to use imagination and non-existence as proof in your belief system. Follow your own saying under your avatar.... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Asking for interpretations of this cladogram
Top
Bottom