Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Asking for interpretations of this cladogram
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Justatruthseeker" data-source="post: 72077748" data-attributes="member: 332164"><p>Please, you don’t really believe that any more than I do. It’s like finches we have discussed. Interchanging genes since arriving on the island, of such mixed ancestory you can barely tell them apart genetically. Yet you keep classifying those variations within species as separate species, all because Darwin incorrectly believed they were reproductively isolated.</p><p></p><p>The true relationship would change the entire cladogram for finches. Why it would then show an actual family tree of interbreeding subspecies, instead of the fake trash cladogram it currently shows of separate species.</p><p></p><p>You got their direct DNA sequenced, and they still refuse to get it correct, because they have the name Darwin attached to them and have their pre-conceived beliefs which they refuse to give up.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.christianforums.com/threads/evolution-speciation-finally-observed-in-the-wild.8037761/page-23" target="_blank">Evolution - Speciation finally observed in the wild?</a></p><p></p><p>Not only are your fellow evolutionists rejecting their own Scientific definitions, but are refusing to follow the DNA data, and worse yet, ignoring what is happening right in front of their eyes. </p><p></p><p>And then every time the variation is considerable, they add non-existent common ancestors to bridge the gap between forms, because it’s the only way they can show any kind of relationship, by inserting hypothetical imaginary forms, and connecting them with hypothetical imaginary lines, and presenting it as if it was fact to fool the uninformed.....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Justatruthseeker, post: 72077748, member: 332164"] Please, you don’t really believe that any more than I do. It’s like finches we have discussed. Interchanging genes since arriving on the island, of such mixed ancestory you can barely tell them apart genetically. Yet you keep classifying those variations within species as separate species, all because Darwin incorrectly believed they were reproductively isolated. The true relationship would change the entire cladogram for finches. Why it would then show an actual family tree of interbreeding subspecies, instead of the fake trash cladogram it currently shows of separate species. You got their direct DNA sequenced, and they still refuse to get it correct, because they have the name Darwin attached to them and have their pre-conceived beliefs which they refuse to give up. [URL="https://www.christianforums.com/threads/evolution-speciation-finally-observed-in-the-wild.8037761/page-23"]Evolution - Speciation finally observed in the wild?[/URL] Not only are your fellow evolutionists rejecting their own Scientific definitions, but are refusing to follow the DNA data, and worse yet, ignoring what is happening right in front of their eyes. And then every time the variation is considerable, they add non-existent common ancestors to bridge the gap between forms, because it’s the only way they can show any kind of relationship, by inserting hypothetical imaginary forms, and connecting them with hypothetical imaginary lines, and presenting it as if it was fact to fool the uninformed..... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Asking for interpretations of this cladogram
Top
Bottom