Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Asking for interpretations of this cladogram
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tas8831" data-source="post: 72062034" data-attributes="member: 397968"><p>Ah - 'intelligently designed.'</p><p></p><p>I find it odd that someone with a claimed 30 years of study and talking to scientists on these subjects would dive immediately for the lamest of all implied arguments (only referring to bible verses is lamer, IMO) - that something about the analysis is man-made, therefore, suspect.</p><p></p><p>I have even seen creationists so desperate to diminish the impact of some research that they have gone so far to claim that the building the research was done in was 'intelligently designed' - implying that therefore, somehow, intelligent design creationism has merit.</p><p></p><p>But yes - let us concede that analytical programs are, in fact, 'intelligently designed' and man-made.</p><p></p><p>Just like the material used by creation scientists who try to claim that evolution is false.</p><p>Just like the bible.</p><p></p><p>More later - off to an evilution meeting...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tas8831, post: 72062034, member: 397968"] Ah - 'intelligently designed.' I find it odd that someone with a claimed 30 years of study and talking to scientists on these subjects would dive immediately for the lamest of all implied arguments (only referring to bible verses is lamer, IMO) - that something about the analysis is man-made, therefore, suspect. I have even seen creationists so desperate to diminish the impact of some research that they have gone so far to claim that the building the research was done in was 'intelligently designed' - implying that therefore, somehow, intelligent design creationism has merit. But yes - let us concede that analytical programs are, in fact, 'intelligently designed' and man-made. Just like the material used by creation scientists who try to claim that evolution is false. Just like the bible. More later - off to an evilution meeting... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Asking for interpretations of this cladogram
Top
Bottom