Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It's a complex question, because 'fire' is quite a nebulous concept, especially when you take it to extremes. Wikipedia calls it 'rapid oxidation', and the flame is a mixture of glowing solids and gases. I suppose there's no lower limit to how cold it could be, depending on how loosely you interpret 'rapid' oxidation.What is the coldest temperature a fire could withstand?
Apparently it's one of the newly discovered Y Dwarfs, the coldest of the brown dwarfs. NASA's article is here.Presumably that would be a brown dwarf, not a star undergoing nuclear fusion in its core
It sounds like a dwarf that's been pooped out. Though the way we treat our dwarf, it's quite an apt nicknameBrowndwarf, the next time I play DnD that's what I'll call my character.
Interesting.Apparently it's one of the newly discovered Y Dwarfs, the coldest of the brown dwarfs. NASA's article is here.
Probably, but they're still newly discovered inasmuch as, not long ago, we hadn't seen one before. As good as theory is, there's nothing quite like seeing the hypothetical star. Which is the great thing about science: we can go out and see that it works!Interesting.
Of course, I should mention that this isn't so much a discovery of a new class of object, but rather the extremely low temperatures of these objects makes them very, very hard to detect. We generally expect compact objects to be more numerous the smaller they are. So there are likely more of these sorts of objects than there are the heavier stars that we can more readily see.
Actually, one of the cool things there is that quantum mechanics starts to become extremely important even for very large systems as their temperatures get closer to 0K. And instead of all motion ceasing, a system at 0K in quantum mechanics has its wavefunction in the ground state. And the ground state, as it turns out, doesn't have zero motion.At absolute zero (naught Kelvin) all molecular movement ceases and thus all chemical reactions such as oxidation cannot take place! Of course reaching naught Kelvin is almost an impossibility but we have come extremely close to it!
Ah those Brits really know their scienceActually, one of the cool things there is that quantum mechanics starts to become extremely important even for very large systems as their temperatures get closer to 0K. And instead of all motion ceasing, a system at 0K in quantum mechanics has its wavefunction in the ground state. And the ground state, as it turns out, doesn't have zero motion.
Is their a superferrofluid ?Whenever I see magnets and ferrofluids and superfluids, I'm sure there's a way to break some thermodynamic law. It reminds me of these sorts of troll physics:
...snip...
That sounds almost crazy enough to be trueIt's easy to see how the naive might think it would work, though. I read once that people in a neighbourhood in Africa were shown how to use condoms with a cucumber - and they ended up buying cucumbers en masse, putting condoms on them, and then having unprotected sex, thinking they were baby-proof.
Doesn't the definition of a star include sustained fusion?It's a complex question, because 'fire' is quite a nebulous concept, especially when you take it to extremes. Wikipedia calls it 'rapid oxidation', and the flame is a mixture of glowing solids and gases. I suppose there's no lower limit to how cold it could be, depending on how loosely you interpret 'rapid' oxidation.
Interestingly, NASA recently found a star that was a balmy 27-70°C. Not exactly chilly, but pretty darn cold for a star.
I thought the whole herd of starless Jupiters that they discovered a while ago was way cool.Interesting.
Of course, I should mention that this isn't so much a discovery of a new class of object, but rather the extremely low temperatures of these objects makes them very, very hard to detect. We generally expect compact objects to be more numerous the smaller they are. So there are likely more of these sorts of objects than there are the heavier stars that we can more readily see.
Whenever I see magnets and ferrofluids and superfluids, I'm sure there's a way to break some thermodynamic law. It reminds me of these sorts of troll physics:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?