Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Arificial selection in populations of fruit flies.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rush1169" data-source="post: 61103934" data-attributes="member: 309746"><p>So what's the verdict?</p><p> </p><p></p><p>I'm confused. Are we talking about <em>anything </em>changing or talking about a fly into a bee or a fish into a mammal?</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>How I see it: Before our advancement of science, humans had the biblical Genesis account to explain origins. That account is timeless and sufficient for all human levels of intellect and knowledge. Today, science is quickly understanding how it all works together as a system. Back in the "old days" the creation paradigm was such that God created one thing, paused, created another thing, paused, created another thing, paused, created another thing and continued with successive creation events, one-at-a-time over the course of time. What science is revealing is that the creation events were fewer and further between. "In the beginning" was a Big Bang (the creation event) that included <em>everything</em> needed for nature to run it's course and result in you, me, and this day we live. </p><p> </p><p>I'm much more impressed that everything that is and will be was incorporated into that one creation event than I was when I thought God used a series of individual events over time to get to where we are today. As an analogy, I'd be much more impressed if humans could build a machine that you feed hydrogen atoms and out comes whatever you tell it (a car, for example) than I am compared to the way we do it now (which is still pretty neat, but pales in comparison).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rush1169, post: 61103934, member: 309746"] So what's the verdict? I'm confused. Are we talking about [I]anything [/I]changing or talking about a fly into a bee or a fish into a mammal? How I see it: Before our advancement of science, humans had the biblical Genesis account to explain origins. That account is timeless and sufficient for all human levels of intellect and knowledge. Today, science is quickly understanding how it all works together as a system. Back in the "old days" the creation paradigm was such that God created one thing, paused, created another thing, paused, created another thing, paused, created another thing and continued with successive creation events, one-at-a-time over the course of time. What science is revealing is that the creation events were fewer and further between. "In the beginning" was a Big Bang (the creation event) that included [I]everything[/I] needed for nature to run it's course and result in you, me, and this day we live. I'm much more impressed that everything that is and will be was incorporated into that one creation event than I was when I thought God used a series of individual events over time to get to where we are today. As an analogy, I'd be much more impressed if humans could build a machine that you feed hydrogen atoms and out comes whatever you tell it (a car, for example) than I am compared to the way we do it now (which is still pretty neat, but pales in comparison). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Arificial selection in populations of fruit flies.
Top
Bottom