Argue the Opposite

Sayre said:

I let out a chuckle when I read this. The modal ontological argument is probably one of the strongest - but still not strong.

I think (and so sorry for repeating WLC) but that each of these arguments in and of themselves are not perfect and nor do they alone prove that God exists. They are all part of accumulating evidence for God.

Click to expand...

Paradoxum said:

I didn't see healings, I just heard of them from people or organisations I trusted. I'd heard people talking about being healing.

I once prayed for someone in a group, and we all felt a strong 'presence of God' as I was praying. I was already doubting God at that point, but I think I viewed that as potentially good evidence.

Click to expand...

durangodawood said:

It is really really hard to argue the opposite of what you think makes good sense without devolving into parodies of those arguments.

Click to expand...