Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Are we ever justified in believing p without sufficient evidence for p?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Charlie24" data-source="post: 74604840" data-attributes="member: 360213"><p>I thought the P was for predestination at first glance being that there is so much talk of it lately.</p><p></p><p>Biblical doctrine is based on scripture interpreting scripture. But the whole scripture must be taken in consideration for this to work properly, or to create sufficient evidence. </p><p></p><p>All biblical doctrine out there is not correct. I wonder in most cases if proper hermeneutics is used to interpret doctrine. In some cases I think hermeneutics is left by the way.</p><p></p><p>There is more evidence to be found in determining some doctrine than others. This leaves the gray area where false doctrine is born.</p><p></p><p>To determine sufficient evidence in anything requires a deep study of the subject at hand. There are some who never take the time to endeavor, and therefore, come to the wrong conclusion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Charlie24, post: 74604840, member: 360213"] I thought the P was for predestination at first glance being that there is so much talk of it lately. Biblical doctrine is based on scripture interpreting scripture. But the whole scripture must be taken in consideration for this to work properly, or to create sufficient evidence. All biblical doctrine out there is not correct. I wonder in most cases if proper hermeneutics is used to interpret doctrine. In some cases I think hermeneutics is left by the way. There is more evidence to be found in determining some doctrine than others. This leaves the gray area where false doctrine is born. To determine sufficient evidence in anything requires a deep study of the subject at hand. There are some who never take the time to endeavor, and therefore, come to the wrong conclusion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Are we ever justified in believing p without sufficient evidence for p?
Top
Bottom