Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Are there transitional fossils?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pshun2404" data-source="post: 71415835" data-attributes="member: 301030"><p>"T<strong><em>he best transitional species are those that are fairly intermediate between the groups in question "</em></strong></p><p></p><p>Yes the best called "transitionals" are intermediate between the two groups in question, not just based on similarity of appearance of some features, or that they have some features in common with others, and that alone excludes the natural de-selected unsuccessful knuckewalker Lucy as well as the total fish Tik.</p><p></p><p>Nothing is "amphibius" about Tik outside of the artistic reconstructions...</p><p></p><p>And I never said or implied that Tik did not have scales, of course it did...the picture you offered that I called enhanced (the 3rd one) is a photoshoped version of the fossil. Didn't you know that? Sorry! The other two...one the real flattened broken fragmented one (which is given skin/scales, a tail, imaginary proportions, a more robust chest, etc), and the second (which might not even be the same creature but a variety of it) are bonifide real photos of the actual fossils.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pshun2404, post: 71415835, member: 301030"] "T[B][I]he best transitional species are those that are fairly intermediate between the groups in question "[/I][/B] Yes the best called "transitionals" are intermediate between the two groups in question, not just based on similarity of appearance of some features, or that they have some features in common with others, and that alone excludes the natural de-selected unsuccessful knuckewalker Lucy as well as the total fish Tik. Nothing is "amphibius" about Tik outside of the artistic reconstructions... And I never said or implied that Tik did not have scales, of course it did...the picture you offered that I called enhanced (the 3rd one) is a photoshoped version of the fossil. Didn't you know that? Sorry! The other two...one the real flattened broken fragmented one (which is given skin/scales, a tail, imaginary proportions, a more robust chest, etc), and the second (which might not even be the same creature but a variety of it) are bonifide real photos of the actual fossils. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Are there transitional fossils?
Top
Bottom