Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I'll take the trouble, thank you.
My answer to satisfy the OP is simply this:
"Missing links."
If you think I'm wrong, show me pictures of something that exists between Homo [this] and Homo [that].
The way theories work is that a single contrary
fact can disprove it.
Many claim to "know" evolution is false. But no Nobel is awarded.
Does anyone have such disproof?
If not, how in good conscience can anyone say its false?
So you claim.
My claims are more valid than evolution's claims.
My claims are based on missing links, which cannot be denied.
Evolution's claims are based on ghost bridges between one life form and another.
Do you want the skull picture again?
Do you want that chart showing Dawkins pointing out our closest living relatives again?
The one I use to show what I call those "blue lines"?
But your claims aren't more valid that the 'claims' of evolution.
You are, in the grand sense of everything and especially science, a nobody.
Why do you even bother anyway since anyone knows that what you claim about that picture is not what is shown at all?
Either that, or they are.
"Nobodys" were asked in the OP to give their input.
And this "nobody" is giving his contribution.
Sorry you can't see it.
OP also has you on their ignore list and really has no intention of wanting to interact with you.
Again: just because you claim something does not mean that you are right.
Scientist get things wrong all the time.A. By definition a theory can never proved.
B. There is no " god theory"
C. There is one way of interpreting one old book
that says god just made everything as it is.
D. Evolution is not based on " claims " about " beliefs"
someone " thunks" are true.
E. There is enough evidence to say evolution is proved beyond any reasonable doubt.
God beliefs and science are opposite.
Belief has faith, it's emotional in nature
Science is fact based. Objective in nature.
Like auto mechanics.
Auto mechanics are the same regardless of " belief sysyem".
As for many moons? Don't be too hasty.
There's a great many things we know happened- and many we know did not.
We know Antarctica was once tropical. We know dinosaurs roamed the earth.
We know there was no flood.
The thread though is about disproof of evolution.
Not opinions about "belief systems". Or "god".
Scientist get things wrong all the time.
God does not need to prove Himself. He is everywhere in the whole creation. Some people just harden their hearts and believe all sorts of nonsense because humans are evil. If they admitted there is God, then they would have to admit they are sinners and deserve God's wrath.
Admiting to God also means they have to worship God, but people worship themselves.
It's pointless writing to you about God, because you don't want to believe, but I'll write to you what you and others need to know.
God is Holy, without sin. Sin separates us from God, and because we sin, we deserve to be punished. But God in His mercy judges no one by their sins today. He sent His Son so whomever believes in Him should not perrish but have an everlasting life. But because God is just, His mercy will end one day, and He will punish every sinner that did not believe in the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
Of course science is often wrong.Scientist get things wrong all the time.
God does not need to prove Himself. He is everywhere in the whole creation. Some people just harden their hearts and believe all sorts of nonsense because humans are evil. If they admitted there is God, then they would have to admit they are sinners and deserve God's wrath.
Admiting to God also means they have to worship God, but people worship themselves.
It's pointless writing to you about God, because you don't want to believe, but I'll write to you what you and others need to know.
God is Holy, without sin. Sin separates us from God, and because we sin, we deserve to be punished. But God in His mercy judges no one by their sins today. He sent His Son so whomever believes in Him should not perrish but have an everlasting life. But because God is just, His mercy will end one day, and He will punish every sinner that did not believe in the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
No. This is an appealing, but overly simplistic notion that is that clear odds with the way the world works. You appear to be effectively claiming that there is no such thing as objective truth, only subjective belief.Do you have proof that the evolution theory is true or disproof in the God theory? We all make claims of what we think are true but it all stems from a belief system.
Scientist get things wrong all the time.
God does not need to prove Himself. He is everywhere in the whole creation. Some people just harden their hearts and believe all sorts of nonsense because humans are evil. If they admitted there is God, then they would have to admit they are sinners and deserve God's wrath.
Admiting to God also means they have to worship God, but people worship themselves.
It's pointless writing to you about God, because you don't want to believe, but I'll write to you what you and others need to know.
It is pointless in this forum because this is the Physical and Life Sciences forum and the thread topic is "A fact that disproves the Theory of Evolution" Nothing you've written here has anything to do with the thread topic or the statement of purpose for any post in the forum.God is Holy, without sin. Sin separates us from God, and because we sin, we deserve to be punished. But God in His mercy judges no one by their sins today. He sent His Son so whomever believes in Him should not perrish but have an everlasting life. But because God is just, His mercy will end one day, and He will punish every sinner that did not believe in the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
Do you want that chart showing Dawkins pointing out our closest living relatives again?
The one I use to show what I call those "blue lines"?
Warden, if there are no missing links, as you seem to be implying, then why, when a missing link is "found," do they spread it all over the earth on Page One of the media ... in large font?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?