• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Are soldiers evil?

Status
Not open for further replies.

eclipsoul

Lover
Apr 4, 2004
574
54
47
Washington, D.C.
Visit site
✟30,994.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Engaged
Are soldiers evil? I was once a soldier. I wrote this article to try and think it through. Was I evil? Are my friends evil? Is my brother? No. It doesn't seem right to use the word evil. I'm a pacifist, now. But I don't see how I can call soldiers evil. So how do I think about this? Maybe this article will help us to think about it...

Christ’s Centurions
by Nate Wildermuth


On December 16th, 2003, I was discharged from the United States Army as a conscientious objector. On Easter of 2004, I was confirmed into the Catholic Church.

"Therefore, the sacrament by which spiritual strength is conferred on the one born again makes him in some sense a front-line fighter for the faith of Christ. And because fighters under a prince carry his insignia, they who receive the Sacrament of Confirmation are signed with the Sign of the Cross by which He fought and conquered."
- St. Thomas Aquinas​

Today at mass I was struck by the prayer we say right before receiving communion, the last prayer Catholics say before consuming the body of Christ. It is the earnest groaning of a 'front-line fighter' – the humble plea of the Roman centurion who met Jesus 2,000 years ago: "Lord, I am not worthy to receive you, but only say the word and I shall be healed." (Mt 8:5, Lk 7:1). In this story, the local Roman commander asks Jesus to heal his dying slave, but refuses to let Jesus come under his roof, claiming to be unworthy. In Luke's account, the soldier feels so unworthy that he refuses to even meet Jesus, and instead sends out messengers to greet him.
And so I said this prayer of the centurion, and I reminded myself of my own unworthiness – recalling my life of sin. And suddenly a question occurred to me: why did the centurion, a pagan of power and honor, feel unworthy to be in the presence of a Galilean carpenter?

A more immediate question may help – why was a Roman centurion there in the first place? A brief history: In 63 BC the Roman General Pompey conquered Jerusalem, killing thousands. In 6 AD successive Roman procurators began ruling over a rebellious Judea, one of whom was Pontius Pilate. In 70 AD, after a Jewish uprising against the foreign rulers, the centurions of Titus crushed the rebellion and destroyed Jerusalem. Jesus was not the only one crucified during this 100-year period. Thousands were. Their dying bodies lined the highways as examples of those who dared to resist the imperial might of Rome. And Roman soldiers were the ones who crucified them. Roman centurions crucified Jesus.

Recalling this history, and recalling that Christ was murdered along with two 'revolutionaries', the story of the centurion becomes particularly compelling. It sends a chill crawling along my flesh, for I too was a centurion. I swore oaths of allegiance to standards and leaders. I declared my undying service to the eternal Republic, and fought back tears of pride, devotion, and love. Being a soldier wasn't just some job. Being a soldier meant something. It went deep – into my heart, finding a place as a truth of my existence – of who I was. I was an America Soldier: a centurion of the greatest nation since Rome.

And I was just like that Roman centurion. Though we served Caesar, something within us compelled us to seek Christ. Something was burning us from the inside – revealing our unworthiness and sinfulness, letting us know that something was missing. Caesar might own us, but only this Christ could heal us. And so we went out to him.

The Gospels don't record what happened to the centurion after Jesus met him. Did he return to his life as a centurion of Rome, worshiping Caesar as a deity? Or did he sell his possessions (including his slaves), lay the money at the feet of Christ, and become a disciple? Did the centurion remain a soldier of the Empire, and go on to help crush the Jewish insurrections? Or did he follow Christ to the cross and become a martyr?

I don't know what that centurion did afterwards. All I can share with you is my story, a story of how I was reborn as Christ's Centurion.

I enlisted into the Army on February 8th, 2000. I joined for all the typical reasons – I was a middle class military brat who'd wasted his time in college drinking and doing drugs, and in the process, had lost my grip on life's meaning. Maybe I had never had it. But somewhere along the way I pulled together all the different threads of all the 'wisest' men's sayings, and found: "If you want to be happy, if you want meaning out of life, then serve others. Don't live for yourself. Live for others." With college debts piled up, with my family living a continent away, and with feelings of futility about my ability to do anything else, I joined the Army. The military told me that I'd get $20,000 to become a forward observer. I didn't care what kind of job they gave me. If it paid that much, if it was being done in order to serve others, if my friends and family all applauded my decision to 'get some discipline', then heck yeah – I'd do it. So I did.

Three years later I was in a bunk at West Point, the United States Military Academy, crying. It was late at night, so I was trying not to make any noise. I didn't want to wake up either of my two roommates. What would they think? I'd been an elite Army Ranger. I was one of twelve out of more than one hundred to graduate from Ranger training. We’d gone through hell and come out burning for more. We were killers, everyone knew that. A Ranger would take their bayonet, stick it in your throat, twist, pull, plunge again, and then [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse] in your face as you drowned in blood. If America needed someone dead, anyone dead, it'd call us. And we'd do it. We'd hop in an airplane, spend 14 hours chanting about napalming churches and machine-gunning nuns, and then we'd jump out, land, pull out our bayonets, and start to kill. And then we'd come home with medals and laugh and laugh and... and now I was at West Point, and I was going to lead others in wars that I had only dreamt about. I would become a Green Berets officer, and I'd fight for their motto – De Oppresso Liber: "to free the oppressed." I would kill, yes. I would train others to kill, yes. But I would serve, and I would free those in darkness.

So why was I crying? Wasn't I an American Soldier? Wasn't I a steely-eyed killer? Hadn't the Army given me pride and purpose? Didn't my parents love me again? Didn't men and women buy me drinks at NYC bars, clap me on the shoulder and say, "You're a hero, soldier. You're a god**** f***ing hero. Now go kill those f***ing terrorists!?"

So why was I crying? What was wrong with me?

The same thing that was wrong with me before I joined the Army, the same thing that's wrong with every human being. It's that emptiness we feel inside us. It's what divides us from one another – causing fights between loved ones, starting wars between nations. It's what the Church calls original sin – what makes us sinners instead of saints. But we don't need the Church to tell us that evil exists in the world. We already know it does. We only have to look inside ourselves to know that. And that was exactly what had happened to me at West Point. I looked at my life, I looked at my heart, and I broke down and cried.

I hadn't joined the Army because of Christ. I hadn't become a centurion for Christ. I'd done it for America, for my family, for my friends, and ultimately – for myself. And I was still as wretched of a sinner as I'd been before. I still only knew Christ from the fringes of half-forgotten masses and half-said prayers. And the last traces of faith were dying within the spiritual vice of Caesar's Army.

But then, I did what the Roman centurion did 2,000 years ago. Knowing that I was unworthy, knowing that I had no right to approach Jesus, I put away my pride and shame and walked out to him. And when I knelt before Christ, and opened my ears to his Word, he finally spoke. Jesus didn't want my oaths. He didn't want declarations of faith. He wanted something more than words. He wanted me to wage war with him against our true enemies: death, sorrow, evil. He wanted me to become a front-line fighter for the faith. He wanted me to be his centurion. And in three words, I received my new commission – Christ's mission: Love your enemies.

These three words contradicted everything I had learned. The world had taught me that we could only fight against evil by being strong and powerful, by crushing our enemies. But Jesus hadn't been strong or powerful. Instead, looking down from the cross, Christ's bloody eyes spoke of another way: we fight by loving our enemies, by conquering evil with good. Instead of killing sinners, we convert them. Mercy is our weapon. Sacrifice is our hope. Love is our Faith.

Christ died to save his enemies. He died as the Father's perfect warrior.

Across the ages, countless centurions have served Caesar and found him lacking: St. Maximilian, martyr: "I will never serve. You can cut off my head, but I will not be a soldier of this world, for I am a soldier of Christ." St. Marcellus, martyr: "I serve Jesus Christ the eternal King. I will no longer serve your emperors." St. Martin of Tours, bishop: "I am the soldier of Christ: it is not lawful for me to fight."

And add St. Victricius, St. Primus, St. Cyrinus, St. Theogenes, and all the other centurions who were persecuted because they refused to fight for Caesar. And we can't forget St. Francis and St. Ignatius. All of these men had once fought as centurions of the world, but in the spiritual prison of bloodshed, they turned to Christ for freedom. They had all been sinners. They had all been Caesar's centurions. But they became saints, and are now Christ's Centurions forever.

Who are we going to be? We can fight for Caesar or Christ, but not both. One uses violence to forge its empire, the other uses love. One uses force, the other uses faith. Empires crumble, but the Body of Christ rises forever. Who are we going to fight for? Who are we going to be? A Centurion of the Empire or a Centurion of Christ?
 

ProCommunioneFacior

I'm an ultra-traditionalist, run for your life ;)
Oct 30, 2003
11,154
562
44
Mesa, Arizona
Visit site
✟36,647.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Catechism

2310 Public authorities, in this case, have the right and duty to impose on citizens the obligations necessary for national defense. Those who are sworn to serve their country in the armed forces are servants of the security and freedom of nations. If they carry out their duty honorably, they truly contribute to the common good of the nation and the maintenance of peace.
 
Upvote 0

QuantaCura

Rejoice always.
Aug 17, 2005
9,164
958
44
✟36,762.00
Faith
Catholic
Sadly, it is an unfortunate reality that due to man's fallen nature soldiers are required to maintain peace. Likewise, St. Paul in Holy Writ says this about the state using force when necessary to maintain order:

Rom. 13:3 For princes are not a terror to the good work, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? Do that which is good: and thou shalt have praise from the same. 4 For he is God's minister to thee, for good. But if thou do that which is evil, fear: for he beareth not the sword in vain. For he is God's minister: an avenger to execute wrath upon him that doth evil. 5 Wherefore be subject of necessity, not only for wrath, but also for conscience' sake.


Sure, in a perfect world we could all be pacifists because their would be no unjust violence. But, since the world is not perfect yet, God permits--and even requires--force to be used to ensure a just ordering of society.
 
Upvote 0

ProCommunioneFacior

I'm an ultra-traditionalist, run for your life ;)
Oct 30, 2003
11,154
562
44
Mesa, Arizona
Visit site
✟36,647.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
So did you guys read the article?

I just read the article. Very well written, I agree wholeheartedly.

I never could fathom myself killing somebody which is why I never joined the military, even though both of my brothers did. My older brother is a Lieutenant Colonel. It is not my calling, however I do believe in the Church teaching in this regard that national defense is a necessity, a necessary evil? perhaps.

I do not know what I would do if I were in the military and sent to Iraq, as I do not believe it to be a just war.

I wish there were more Catholic chaplains in the military as they could offer some spiritual direction to those guys who were saying such obscenities about other human beings and who took delight in killing.
 
Upvote 0

eclipsoul

Lover
Apr 4, 2004
574
54
47
Washington, D.C.
Visit site
✟30,994.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Engaged
I do not know what I would do if I were in the military and sent to Iraq, as I do not believe it to be a just war.

One great problem is that though the Church teaches that sometimes Catholic cannot fight (in the case of unjust wars), the United States government does not recognize the right of selective conscientious objection - you are not allowed to pick and choose which wars that you are willing to fight in.

It's really a horrible situation that Catholic soldiers encounter. Unless they reject all wars entirely (as I did), unless they go to the fringes of current Catholic teachings (which support nonviolence on a personal level, but not on a collective level), they are stuck.

Worse, chaplains don't seem to understand this, and tell soldiers that they shouldn't worry about whether a war is just or not. We were told only to obey our orders to wage war, and then to wage war according to moral laws (whatever that means).
 
Upvote 0

helenofbritain

St Mary MacKillop of the Cross, pray for us
Oct 24, 2006
10,293
699
Canberra
✟36,561.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Thought provoking article. Where did you find it?

More Catechism

(funny, I already had the right section open due to an abortion post on a different thread :) )

2312 The Church and human reason both assert the permanent validity of the moral law during armed conflict. "The mere fact that war has regrettably broken out does not mean that everything becomes licit between the warring parties." (GS 79 s4)

2313 Non-combatants, wounded soldiers and prisoners must be respected and treated humanely.
Actions deliberately contrary to the law of nations and to its universal principles are crimes, as are the orders that command such actions. Blind obedience does not suffice to excuse those who carry them out. Thus the extermination of a people, nation, or ethnic minority must be condemned as a mortal sin. One is morally bound to resist orders that command genocide.

Etc. Go look it up :)

So, no, soldiers are NOT evil, as long as they play by the rules. Raping and pillaging are right out. Loving thy neighbour in the next trench is in.
 
Upvote 0

Radagast

comes and goes
Site Supporter
Dec 10, 2003
23,896
9,877
✟367,481.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
St Julius the Veteran and St Marinus were Christians and soldiers. St Maximillian was a conscientious objector.

From the beginning, some, but not all, Christians have felt that "giving to Caesar what belongs to Caesar" did not include fighting.
 
Upvote 0

eclipsoul

Lover
Apr 4, 2004
574
54
47
Washington, D.C.
Visit site
✟30,994.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Engaged
But are there really that many saints who were saints because they were soldiers?

Saints are saints not because they were perfect on earth, but because they are perfect in heaven (as we see reflected in their miraculous intercessions here upon earth).

That isn't to say that a Saint didn't have to show signs of holiness during their earthly life. It's simply to say that everything a saint did during their life wasn't always saintly.

As for soldiers, I think of both St. Francis and St. Ignatius, whose horrible experiences of war led them to conversion in Christ, and within that conversion they left behind their fighting days. Instead, they took up Christ's standard, and fought his spiritual wars - using his methods of peace, gentleness, truth, and sacrifice.

St. Martin of Tours was a soldier, but in his conversion became a conscientious objector.

St. Joan of Arc is another example of a woman who was sainted not for her fighting, but for her faith. Dorothy Day herself had a statue of St. Joan at her bedside. And for a really great article about Joan of Arc and Nonviolence - try this pdf.
 
Upvote 0
C

cairaiii

Guest
I think that swearing an oath to be willing to defened the Constitution, a constitution that says abortion is legal, is evil in my opinion. I would never die for America or its Constitution, soley on that point. Thus I am unwilling to ever join the service. However not everyone is evil, different people have different reasons for joining.

Now if there were ever a truly Christian Army, waging physcial war for Christ, I would gladly join.
 
Upvote 0

Globalnomad

Senior Veteran
Apr 2, 2005
5,390
660
73
Change countries every three years
✟31,257.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
eclipsoul:

First of all, thanks for the article. It was spine-chilling and beautiful.

No, soldiers are not evil. No human being is evil, every human being is made in the image and likeness of God and has the chance to be saved right up to the last moment of life. But every human being has a streak of evil in him/her, fed and strengthened by past choices and actions, that can lead him/her to damnation. Soldiers - especially volunteer soldiers and especially those trained in the kind of vicious combat that this article describes - are more at danger than others.

But I believe that those who are in gravest danger are those who train these young men. I will never believe that it is necessary to make you chant about torching churches and killing nuns in order to make you psychologically ready for a just war. The dozens of stories we hear, from Abu Ghraib to the latest unnecessary civilian killings in Iraq, are proof that somewhere this training goes horribly wrong - or that it is just inhumanly callous and careless about letting the evil in.
 
Upvote 0

Michael G

Abe Frohmann
Feb 22, 2004
33,441
11,984
52
Six-burgh, Pa
Visit site
✟110,591.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The Catholic Church has considered the case of canonization of Sir William Wallace, a medieval Scottish commoner turned nobleman who fought the oppression of the Brittish monarchy and brought liberation to the Scottish people. He was a soldier, and while he used a violent method, that violent method was to the benefit of liberating an entire nation from tyranny, torture and abuse.
 
Upvote 0

eclipsoul

Lover
Apr 4, 2004
574
54
47
Washington, D.C.
Visit site
✟30,994.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Engaged
But I believe that those who are in gravest danger are those who train these young men. I will never believe that it is necessary to make you chant about torching churches and killing nuns in order to make you psychologically ready for a just war. The dozens of stories we hear, from Abu Ghraib to the latest unnecessary civilian killings in Iraq, are proof that somewhere this training goes horribly wrong - or that it is just inhumanly callous and careless about letting the evil in.

Those were some of the tamer chants, unfortunately. We sort of took pleasure in coming up with the most perverse lyrics possible. The more shocking, the more brutal, the more outrageously violent, the better. Now I was just a private in one company of one regiment of one army, so I can't say it is everywhere, but I have seen this process of self-brutalization occur in a lot of different places in the Army. But it isn't as if these chants are forced from above. It came from our own hearts. We were training to blow people apart. How do you deal with that?

I don't know how people deal with it when it goes from training to reality, but I imagine that it goes much further.

Most of my friends are soldiers, and I do not believe them any more or less evil than we are. However, the things they do are horrific. And though they are the ones that pull the triggers, we are the ones who arm them, who pat them on the back as we send them off to battle, who preach sermons sanctioning their killing, and who pin medals on their chest when they come back home. Soldiers may be the most spiritually abused segment of our society.
 
Upvote 0

Globalnomad

Senior Veteran
Apr 2, 2005
5,390
660
73
Change countries every three years
✟31,257.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Those were some of the tamer chants, unfortunately. We sort of took pleasure in coming up with the most perverse lyrics possible. The more shocking, the more brutal, the more outrageously violent, the better. Now I was just a private in one company of one regiment of one army, so I can't say it is everywhere, but I have seen this process of self-brutalization occur in a lot of different places in the Army. But it isn't as if these chants are forced from above. It came from our own hearts. We were training to blow people apart. How do you deal with that?

I don't know how people deal with it when it goes from training to reality, but I imagine that it goes much further.

Most of my friends are soldiers, and I do not believe them any more or less evil than we are. However, the things they do are horrific. And though they are the ones that pull the triggers, we are the ones who arm them, who pat them on the back as we send them off to battle, who preach sermons sanctioning their killing, and who pin medals on their chest when they come back home. Soldiers may be the most spiritually abused segment of our society.
That's where the training and leadership comes in. The evil streak in the young men does bubble up in such circumstances, it's natural: it is the task of the leadership to cut it in the bud. If they did not do it, they are responsible for the consequences.

I am a leader myself (in a political setting), and I consider it as one of my key responsibilities to encourage positive thinking and peacemaking instincts in my people. I would take the responsibility on myself if they developed negative, divisive ways of relating to others.

Of course, in an army you don't encourage peacemaking instincts. But you CAN and SHOULD stop your soldiers from getting into the kind of mental excesses you have described. What happened to the old, valuable principle of being "an officer and a gentleman", and training one's troops according to the same values?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.