• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Are Denominations Carnally Based??

Status
Not open for further replies.
G

Godz Marine

Guest
In light of scripture;

I Corinthians 1

10 Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment.
11 For it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren, by them which are of the house of Chloe, that there are contentions among you.
12 Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.
13 Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?
14 I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius;
15 Lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name.
16 And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptized any other.

and;

1 Corinthians 3

1 And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ.
2 I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able.
3 For ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men?
4 For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal?
5 Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers by whom ye believed, even as the Lord gave to every man?
6 I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase.
7 So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase.
8 Now he that planteth and he that watereth are one: and every man shall receive his own reward according to his own labour.
9 For we are labourers together with God: ye are God's husbandry, ye are God's building.
10 According to the grace of God which is given unto me, as a wise masterbuilder, I have laid the foundation, and another buildeth thereon. But let every man take heed how he buildeth thereupon.
11 For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ.

Paul doesn't beat around the bush concerning who we proclaim to be of. He wasn't into denominational segregation at all. In fact he even said those who clung to it were carnal, being babes in Christ, unable to partake of solid food, only that which is easy (milk). I Corinthians 4:3, lets put it into a modern day perspective: For when one says, "I am of Luther (Lutheran)," and another, "I am of Hagen (WOF)," or yet, "I am of Wesley(Methodist)" are we not carnal?
 

BearJim

Active Member
Dec 27, 2003
95
12
70
Chicago, IL
✟275.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
I agree that there is a "carnality" to denominations. Historically, denominations arose out of a truth being restored to the Church. They sem to center on one aspect of Truth instaed of the whole Truth. For example, Luther got hold of Justification by Faith. Unfortunately, he got stuck there, and the Lutherans were born. The Baptists followed with Believer's Baptism, the Methodists with Holiness, the Pentecostals with the baptism in the Holy Spirit and so on...
We need to be open to the leading of God through His Word- without forgetting the truths that are our foundation.
 
Upvote 0

educk

Active Member
Dec 29, 2003
172
5
25
Earth
✟328.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
It is sin to denominate the Body of Christ based on doctrine or revelation. I don't need to agree with your theology or doctrine in order to love you and respect you, and to be one Body of Christ. Denominating ourselves is not from God and is a house divided against itself. You cannot sugarcoat it any other way, and meeting once a month with orther pastors in the district is merely holding hands over the fences.
 
Upvote 0

Charlesinflorida

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2004
503
18
74
Florida, US
Visit site
✟753.00
Faith
Messianic
Marine,

This is why I have worked so hard to bring about a move back to the original church which was made up of those first believers that knew the Lord and were taught under the leadership of the apostles. It was the church that lived survived several hundred years before Roman Paganism took over the church.

Everything that has happened in reformation as mentioned above has been a move back toward that original church. (in wee tiny steps) There are bigger steps that can be made. But just as those men faced people and authorites that did not desire change at all, so also, we who have set the clock back to the practices of the church that first existed fall under the hatred of those who are comfortable with the status quo and do not desire change at all.

Charles in Florida
 
Upvote 0

flyfishing

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2004
450
4
✟612.00
Faith
Christian
denominations exist. Are they carnally based? NO. For example someone mentioned how luther based his life and ministry work on the just shall live by faith... So is that carnally based? Most emphatically not.

I do believe that people who proclaim the foundation of their faith as of a/g or baptist instead of Christ are carnal.. Lets be true to what the context of that scripture says. it is not saying those men were wrong,its when they proclaim themselves as disciples of apollos or peter or even paul that they are wrong.



a thought, do you think that God wants just the one true church? How boring and so unlike him. we need to see the beauty in all the body and appreciate it for its variety... the eye should not say to the leg you are of no use.

there is error in denominations but as the parable of the tares and wheat suggests not pulling out the bad from the good until the ressurection/judgement.

Charles i understand your passion but do not see the book of acts as a blueprint for a modern day church. that church was jewish for example. Certainly the principles can be applyed with success but do you for example see the apostolic ministry in todays church? Remember the qualifications...
 
Upvote 0

Svt4Him

Legend
Site Supporter
Oct 23, 2003
16,711
1,132
54
Visit site
✟98,618.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Charlesinflorida said:
Marine,

This is why I have worked so hard to bring about a move back to the original church which was made up of those first believers that knew the Lord and were taught under the leadership of the apostles. It was the church that lived survived several hundred years before Roman Paganism took over the church.
Actually the original church was a bit messed up, if you really think about it. Read Paul's letters to them in Corinthians, and John's letters in Revelation. It was a work in progress.

In the early 1500s, a German monk named Martin Luther was so conscious of his sins that he spent up to six hours in the confessional. Through study of the Scriptures he found that salvation didn’t come through anything he did, but simply through trusting in the finished work of the cross of Jesus Christ. He listed the contradictions between what the Scriptures said and what his church taught, and nailed his "95 Theses" to the church door in Wittenberg, Germany. Martin Luther became the first to "protest" against the Roman church, and thus he became the father of the Protestant church. Since that split, there have been many disagreements about how much water one should baptize with, how to sing what and why, who should govern who, etc., causing thousands of splinter groups. Many of these groups are convinced that they alone are right. These have become known as Protestant "denominations." Despite the confusion, these churches subscribe to certain foundational beliefs such as the deity, death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. The Bible says, "The foundation of God stands sure, having this seal, The Lord knows them that are his" (2 Timothy 2:19). Thomas Jefferson once wrote of a preacher, Richard Mote, who "exclaimed aloud to his congregation that he did not believe there was a Quaker, Presbyterian, Methodist, or Baptist in heaven, having paused to give his hearers time to stare and to wonder. He added that, in heaven, God knew no distinctions."
 
Upvote 0

Charlesinflorida

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2004
503
18
74
Florida, US
Visit site
✟753.00
Faith
Messianic
flyfishing said:
a thought, do you think that God wants just the one true church? How boring and so unlike him. we need to see the beauty in all the body and appreciate it for its variety... the eye should not say to the leg you are of no use. . . .

Charles i understand your passion but do not see the book of acts as a blueprint for a modern day church. that church was jewish for example. Certainly the principles can be applyed with success but do you for example see the apostolic ministry in todays church? Remember the qualifications...

Yes I really do believe that God wants (wanted) only one church, just as he wanted only one religion in Judaism.

In Torah God says Num 15: [15] One ordinance shall be both for you of the congregation, and also for the stranger that sojourneth with you, an ordinance for ever in your generations: as ye are, so shall the stranger be before the LORD. [16] One law and one manner shall be for you, and for the stranger that sojourneth with you.

Jesus prayed that we be ONE just as he and the father are one.

Paul speaks repeatedly about unity and oneness even between Gentile and Jew. We are all one man joined together through Messiah Yeshua.
It is denominationalism that runs about each with their own part of the puzzle saying "Look I am the eye and have no need for the foot."

Yes that first church IS possible, but not with living apostles. But we do have their words and teachings recorded for us. Many of those first churches never had the opporitunity of meeting the apostles. They believed by what they heard and by the leter which they had (and we have some of those as well) All we have to do is do what they say and do what they did that was right. We should not do the things that were criticised by Paul and the others because those were error.

Yes the first church was Hebraic, because that is exactly what it was meant to be. The gentiles were to be called and grafted into the vine. The vine was not destroyed and the new Gentile church formed to replace it. That is a lie from hell itself. And you will not find a single word from any apostle or from Jesus that says that the new church would replace anyone or anything. The Church is the begining of the Kingdom of Messiah when Gods promise to call out for himself a people from among the gentiles is being fulfilled. He calls them out to add to what he already had, Israel. We are one people all under the one God.

[15] One ordinance shall be both for you of the congregation, and also for the stranger that sojourneth with you, an ordinance for ever in your generations: as ye are, so shall the stranger be before the LORD. [16] One law and one manner shall be for you, and for the stranger that sojourneth with you.

CIF
 
Upvote 0

Charlesinflorida

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2004
503
18
74
Florida, US
Visit site
✟753.00
Faith
Messianic
Svt4Him said:
Actually the original church was a bit messed up, if you really think about it. Read Paul's letters to them in Corinthians, and John's letters in Revelation. It was a work in progress.. . .

In the early 1500s, a German monk named Martin Luther was so conscious of his sins that he spent up to six hours in the confessional. Through study of the Scriptures he found that salvation didn’t come through anything he did, but simply through trusting in the finished work of the cross of Jesus Christ. He listed the contradictions between what the Scriptures said and what his church taught, and nailed his "95 Theses" to the church door in Wittenberg, Germany. Martin Luther became the first to "protest" against the Roman church, and thus he became the father of the Protestant church. ."

The first church was messed up in places at first because it was a church in transition. Just as the church of the future will also be messed up when Messiah returns. But even with its faults it was closer to the truth than the church is today. Look at the letters to the churches, and we se that progressive deterioration. And the church of the last days is to be (and is)_ completely fallen from sound doctrine.

Martin Luther did a good thing in starting the reformation, but he did not go far enough. The church in Rome was Pagan top to bottom and compromised. And most of that doctrine remains till today in some degree in all denomiations as well. Martin Luther went on to become the leader of the Jewish holocaust. He hated the Jews and rather than trying to bring the Messiah to them, he set out to eliminate the Jews. Did you know that many of Hitlers speaches calling for the elimination of Jews are actually Luthers sermons and writings word for word?

Is this the fellow you would want to call the founding father of protestantism? As is said above, the original church was Hebraic. Jesus was the savior FIRST of the Jewish nation and then also to the Gentiles. We are grafted into their faith. We should have the spirit of Ruth, "Wherever you go there I will be, wherever you lodge, that is my home. wherever you die there will I be buried. Your people ae mine. Your God is my God. Do not ever urge me to go or to leave you side and leave you."
This was a Gentile woman. And she became the great great....Grandmother of Jesus. How?, by grafting in throough faith.
CIF
 
Upvote 0

flyfishing

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2004
450
4
✟612.00
Faith
Christian
Charlesinflorida said:
Yes I really do believe that God wants (wanted) only one church, just as he wanted only one religion in Judaism.

In Torah God says Num 15: [15] One ordinance shall be both for you of the congregation, and also for the stranger that sojourneth with you, an ordinance for ever in your generations: as ye are, so shall the stranger be before the LORD. [16] One law and one manner shall be for you, and for the stranger that sojourneth with you.

Jesus prayed that we be ONE just as he and the father are one.

Paul speaks repeatedly about unity and oneness even between Gentile and Jew. We are all one man joined together through Messiah Yeshua.
It is denominationalism that runs about each with their own part of the puzzle saying "Look I am the eye and have no need for the foot."

Yes that first church IS possible, but not with living apostles. But we do have their words and teachings recorded for us. Many of those first churches never had the opporitunity of meeting the apostles. They believed by what they heard and by the leter which they had (and we have some of those as well) All we have to do is do what they say and do what they did that was right. We should not do the things that were criticised by Paul and the others because those were error.

Yes the first church was Hebraic, because that is exactly what it was meant to be. The gentiles were to be called and grafted into the vine. The vine was not destroyed and the new Gentile church formed to replace it. That is a lie from hell itself. And you will not find a single word from any apostle or from Jesus that says that the new church would replace anyone or anything. The Church is the begining of the Kingdom of Messiah when Gods promise to call out for himself a people from among the gentiles is being fulfilled. He calls them out to add to what he already had, Israel. We are one people all under the one God.

[15] One ordinance shall be both for you of the congregation, and also for the stranger that sojourneth with you, an ordinance for ever in your generations: as ye are, so shall the stranger be before the LORD. [16] One law and one manner shall be for you, and for the stranger that sojourneth with you.

CIF


Charles i congratulate you on recognizing the apostolic ministry is ceased.

It is evident you are a learned man. I felt your scripture quote of the ot was not contextual..

I would remind you however that in the nt churches listed there were gentile churches and also "messianic believers".. When the apostles gathered to supposedly straighten Paul out the gentile believers were instructed not to follow the ceremonial law etc. It is quite evident that JESUS makes us all one in Christ and no one is superior,all are on equal footing before the cross. However when gentiles first came to CHrist they had no exposure to the religious fromalitys prevalent in "hebrew worship". paul had to correct this type of teaching in colossians.. i believe that the way "jewish believers" worship is beautiful,the way they use ot to typify CHRIST is wonderful. However that is not my culture,my upbringing. So no God never expected there to be one church with peter as its pope..


Perhaps that scripture thou art petra and on this i will build my church is the most misused verse in the bible.

Love ya..
 
Upvote 0

flyfishing

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2004
450
4
✟612.00
Faith
Christian
Charlesinflorida said:
The first church was messed up in places at first because it was a church in transition. Just as the church of the future will also be messed up when Messiah returns. But even with its faults it was closer to the truth than the church is today. Look at the letters to the churches, and we se that progressive deterioration. And the church of the last days is to be (and is)_ completely fallen from sound doctrine.

Martin Luther did a good thing in starting the reformation, but he did not go far enough. The church in Rome was Pagan top to bottom and compromised. And most of that doctrine remains till today in some degree in all denomiations as well. Martin Luther went on to become the leader of the Jewish holocaust. He hated the Jews and rather than trying to bring the Messiah to them, he set out to eliminate the Jews. Did you know that many of Hitlers speaches calling for the elimination of Jews are actually Luthers sermons and writings word for word?

Is this the fellow you would want to call the founding father of protestantism? As is said above, the original church was Hebraic. Jesus was the savior FIRST of the Jewish nation and then also to the Gentiles. We are grafted into their faith. We should have the spirit of Ruth, "Wherever you go there I will be, wherever you lodge, that is my home. wherever you die there will I be buried. Your people ae mine. Your God is my God. Do not ever urge me to go or to leave you side and leave you."
This was a Gentile woman. And she became the great great....Grandmother of Jesus. How?, by grafting in throough faith.
CIF

Charles i understand you have very strong feelings about this. i feel you are wrong. You got proof of these accusations???
 
Upvote 0

Charlesinflorida

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2004
503
18
74
Florida, US
Visit site
✟753.00
Faith
Messianic
flyfishing said:
Charles i understand you have very strong feelings about this. i feel you are wrong. You got proof of these accusations???

From Martin Luther's book Of Jews and their lies Pub. 1543. I would encourage you to read the entire book. He advocated dealing with the Jews totally as a people all guilty of the vilest crimes, and not to judge them individually.

From Luther:

What shall we Christians do with this rejected and condemned people, the Jews? Since they live among us, we dare not tolerate their conduct, now that we are aware of their lying and reviling and blaspheming. If we do, we become sharers in their lies, cursing and blasphemy. Thus we cannot extinguish the unquenchable fire of divine wrath, of which the prophets speak, nor can we convert the Jews. With prayer and the fear of God we must practice a sharp mercy to see whether we might save at least a few from the glowing flames. We dare not avenge ourselves. Vengeance a thousand times worse than we could wish them already has them by the throat. I shall give you my sincere advice:

First, to set fire to their synagogues or schools and to bury and cover with dirt whatever will not burn, so that no man will ever again see a stone or cinder of them. This is to be done in honor of our Lord and of Christendom, so that God might see that we are Christians, and do not condone or knowingly tolerate such public lying, cursing, and blaspheming of his Son and of his Christians. For whatever we tolerated in the past unknowingly_and I myself was unaware of it_will be pardoned by God. But if we, now that we are informed, were to protect and shield such a house for the Jews, existing right before our very nose, in which they lie about, blaspheme, curse, vilify, and defame Christ and us (as was heard above), it would be the same as if we were doing all this and even worse ourselves, as we very well know.

In Deuteronomy 13:12 Moses writes that any city that is given to idolatry shall be totally destroyed by fire, and nothing of it shall be preserved. If he were alive today, he would be the first to set fire to the synagogues and houses of the Jews. For in Deuteronomy 4:2 and 12:32 he commanded very explicitly that nothing is to be added to or subtracted from his law. And Samuel says in I Samuel 15:23 that disobedience to God is idolatry. Now the Jews' doctrine at present is nothing but the additions of the rabbis and the idolatry of disobedience, so that Moses has become entirely unknown among them (as we said before), just as the Bible became unknown under the papacy in our day. So also, for Moses' sake, their schools cannot be tolerated; they defame him just as much as they do us. It is not necessary that they have their own free churches for such idolatry.

Second, I advise that their houses also be razed and destroyed. For they pursue in them the same aims as in their synagogues. Instead they might be lodged under a roof or in a barn, like the gypsies. This will bring home to them the fact that they are not masters in our country, as they boast, but that they are living in exile and in captivity, as they incessantly wail and lament about us before God.

Third, I advise that all their prayer books and Talmudic writings, in which such idolatry, lies, cursing, and blasphemy are taught, be taken from them.

Fourth, I advise that their rabbis be forbidden to teach henceforth on pain of loss of life and limb. For they have justly forfeited the right to such an office by holding the poor Jews captive with the saying of Moses (Deuteronomy 17:10) in which he commands them to obey their teachers on penalty of death, although Moses clearly adds: "what they teach you in accord with the law of the Lord." Those villains ignore that. They wantonly employ the poor people's obedience contrary to the law of the Lord and infuse them with this poison, cursing, and blasphemy. In the same way the pope also held us captive with the declaration in Matthew 16:18, "You are Peter," etc., inducing us to believe all the lies and deceptions that issued from his devilish mind. He did not teach in accord with the word of God, and therefore he forfeited the right to teach.

Fifth, I advise that safe-conduct on the highways be abolished completely for the Jews. For they have no business in the countryside, since they are not lords, officials, tradesmen, or the like. Let them stay at home. I have heard it said that a rich Jew is now traveling across the country with twelve horses his ambition is to become a Kokhba devouring princes, lords, lands, and people with his usury, so that the great lords view it with jealous eyes. If you great lords and princes will not forbid such usurers the highway legally, some day a troop may gather against them, having learned from this booklet the true nature of the Jews and how one should deal with them and not protect their activities. For you, too, must not and cannot protect them unless you wish to become participants in an their abominations in the sight of God. Consider carefully what good could come from this, and prevent it.

Sixth, I advise that usury be prohibited to them, and that all cash and treasure of silver and gold be taken from them and put aside for safekeeping. The reason for such a measure is that, as said above, they have no other means of earning a livelihood than usury, and by it they have stolen and robbed from us an they possess. Such money should now be used in no other way than the following: Whenever a Jew is sincerely converted, he should be handed one hundred, two hundred, or three hundred florins, as personal circumstances may suggest. With this he could set himself up in some occupation for the support of his poor wife and children, and the maintenance of the old or feeble. For such evil gains are cursed if they are not put to use with God's blessing in a good and worthy cause. . . .



Moreover, since priesthood, worship, government with which the greater part, indeed, almost all, of those laws of Moses deal have been at an end for over fourteen hundred years already, it is certain that Moses' law also came to an end and lost its authority. Therefore the imperial laws must be applied to these imperial Jews. Their wish to be Mosaic Jews must not be indulged. In fact, no Jew has been that for over fourteen hundred years.

Seventh, I recommend putting a flail, an ax, a hoe, a spade, a distaff, or a spindle into the hands of young, strong Jews and Jewesses and letting them earn their bread in the sweat of their brow, as was imposed on the children of Adam (Gen. 3 [:19]). For it is not fitting that they should let us accursed Goyim toil in the sweat of our faces while they, the holy people, idle away their time behind the stove, feasting and farting., and on top of all, boasting blasphemously of their lordship over the Christians by means of our sweat. No, one should toss out these lazy rogues by the seat of their pants.

For, as we have heard, God's anger with them is so intense that gentle mercy will only tend to make them worse and worse, while sharp mercy will reform them but little. Therefore, in any case, away with them! . . .

I hear it said that the Jews donate large sums of money and thus prove beneficial to governments. Yes, but where does this money come from? Not from their own possessions but from that of the lords and subjects whom they plunder and rob by means of usury. . . . Over and above that we let them get rich on our sweat and blood, while we remain poor and they suck the marrow from our bones. If it is right for a servant to give his master or for a guest to give his host ten florins annually and, in return, to steal one thousand florins from him, then the servant or the guest will very quickly and easily get rich and the master or the host will soon become a beggar.


In brief, dear princes and lords, those of you who have Jews under your rule: if my counsel does not please you, find better advice, so that you and we all can be rid of the unbearable, devilish burden of the Jews. Lest we become guilty sharers before God in the lies, the blasphemy, the defamation, and the curses which the mad Jews indulge in so freely and wantonly against the person of our Lord Jesus Christ, his dear mother, all Christians, all authority, and ourselves. Do not grant them protection, safe-conduct, or communion with us. Do not aid and abet them in acquiring your money or your subjects' money and property by means of usury. We have enough sin of our own without this, dating back to the papacy, and we add to it daily with our ingratitude and our contempt of God's word and all his grace; so it is not necessary to burden ourselves also with these alien, shameful vices of the Jews and over and above it all, to pay them for it with money and property. Let us consider that we are now daily struggling with the Turks, which surely calls for a lessening of our sins and a reformation of our life. With this faithful counsel and warning I wish to cleanse and exonerate my conscience.

And you, my dear gentlemen and friends who are pastors and preachers, I wish to remind very faithfully of your official duty, so that you too may warn your parishioners concerning their eternal harm,. . . But whether the government acts or not. Let everyone at least be guided by his own conscience and form for himself a definition or image of a Jew.




Especially you pastors who have Jews living in your midst, persist in reminding your lords and rulers to be mindful of their office and of their obligation before God to force the Jews to work, to forbid usury, and to check their blasphemy and cursing. For if they punish thievery, robbery, murder, blasphemy, and other vices among us Christians, why should the devilish Jews be scot-free to commit their crimes among us and against us? We suffer more from them than the Italians do from the Spaniards, who plunder the host's kitchen, cellar, chest, and purse, and, in addition, curse him and threaten him with death.


But if the authorities are reluctant to use force and restrain the Jews' devilish wantonness, the latter should, as we said, be expelled from the country and be told to return to their land and their possessions in Jerusalem, where they may lie, curse, blaspheme, defame, murder, steal, rob, practice usury, mock, and indulge in all those infamous abominations which they practice among us, and leave us our government, our country, our life, and our property, much more leave our Lord the Messiah, our faith, and our church undefiled and uncontaminated with their devilish tyranny and malice. Any privileges that they may plead shall not help them; for no one can grant privileges for practicing such abominations. These cancel and abrogate all privileges.

I suppose that the princes will now wish to show mercy to the Jews, the bloodthirsty foes of our Christian and human name, in order to earn heaven thereby. But that the Jews enmesh us, harass us, torment and distress us poor Christians in every way with the above mentioned devilish and detestable deeds, this they want us to tolerate, and this is a good Christian deed, especially if there is any money involved (which they have filched and stolen from us).

What are we poor preachers to do meanwhile? In the first place, we will believe that our Lord Jesus Christ is truthful when he declares of the Jews who did not accept but crucified him, "You are a brood of vipers and children of the devil [cf. Matt. 12:34]. This is a judgment in which his forerunner John the Baptist concurred, although these people were his kin. Now our authorities and all such merciful saints as wish the Jews well will at least have to let us believe our Lord Jesus Christ, who, I am sure, has a more intimate knowledge of all hearts than do those compassionate saints. He knows that these Jews are a brood of vipers and children of the devil, that is, people who will accord us the same benefits as does their father, the devil, and by now we Christians should have learned from Scripture as well as experience just how much he wishes us well.

I have read and heard many stories about the Jews which agree with this judgment of Christ, namely, how they have poisoned wells, made assassinations, kidnaped children, as related before. I have heard that one Jew sent another Jew, and this by means of a Christian, a pot of blood, together with a barrel of wine, in which when drunk empty, a dead Jew was found. There are many other similar stories. For their kidnaping of children they have often been burned at the stake or banished (as we already heard). I am well aware that they deny all of this. However, it all coincides with the judgment of Christ which declares that they are venomous, bitter, vindictive, tricky serpents, assassins, and children of the devil who sting and work harm stealthily wherever they cannot do it openly. For this reason I should like to see them where there are no Christians. The Turks and other heathen do not tolerate what we Christians endure from these venomous serpents and young devils. Nor do the Jews treat any others as they do us Christians. That is what I had in mind when I said earlier that, next to the devil, a Christian has no more bitter and galling foe than a Jew. There is no other to whom we accord as many benefactions and from whom we suffer as much as we do from these base children of the devil, this brood of vipers.

. . .-- these venomous serpents and devil's children, who are the most vehement enemies of Christ our Lord and of us all. And if that is not enough, let him stuff them into his mouth, or crawl into their behind and worship this holy object.


And if you say that the Jews do not believe or know this since they do not accept the New Testament, I reply that the Jews may know or believe this or that; we Christians, however, know that they publicly blaspheme and curse God the Father when they blaspheme and curse this Jesus. Tell me, what are we going to answer God if he takes us to account now or on the day of judgment, saying: "Listen, you are a Christian. You are aware of the fact that the Jews openly blasphemed and cursed my Son and Me, you gave them opportunity for it, you protected and shielded them so that they could engage in this without hindrance or punishment in your country, city, and house." Tell me: What will we answer to this?


There is much much more. This forum limits the size of the post and therefore I have provided only a small sampling.

CIF
 
Upvote 0

Charlesinflorida

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2004
503
18
74
Florida, US
Visit site
✟753.00
Faith
Messianic
Let it also be known flyfisherman, that these words of Luther instigated riots and killings of Jews all over Europe, with untold thousands being killed, including women and children. And for 500 years since his Antisemitic teachings against the Jews against the law of Moshe have lead to the deaths of millions of Jews, further driving my Jewish brothers away from any chance of accepting Yeshua as the Messiah.

CIF
 
Upvote 0

Charlesinflorida

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2004
503
18
74
Florida, US
Visit site
✟753.00
Faith
Messianic
flyfishing said:
Charles the few paragraps i read were quite enough. That doctrine is intolerable. Now i question this mans salvation! those who bless thee he will bless and those who curse thee he will curse. At what point in luthers life was this written???

This was written later in his life, near the end. Luther never renounced the worship of Mary the mother godess. He continued to hold to many of the Catholic traditions. Flyfisher, this is only the tip of the iceberg. Those who the church call the "church fathers", those men who framed Christianity for nearly 300 years and whose teachings are still considered foundational, well, they were of the same spirit and cloth as Luther. The church needs to really take a hard look at their traditions and what kind of men designed the religion. I did, and that is part of the reason, I am now a Biblical Messianic.

If you read these few paragraphs you have already looked deeper than 99.9% of all christians who will not even look at or concider that there might have been something amiss.

CIF
 
Upvote 0

flyfishing

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2004
450
4
✟612.00
Faith
Christian
Charlesinflorida said:
This was written later in his life, near the end. Luther never renounced the worship of Mary the mother godess. He continued to hold to many of the Catholic traditions. Flyfisher, this is only the tip of the iceberg. Those who the church call the "church fathers", those men who framed Christianity for nearly 300 years and whose teachings are still considered foundational, well, they were of the same spirit and cloth as Luther. The church needs to really take a hard look at their traditions and what kind of men designed the religion. I did, and that is part of the reason, I am now a Biblical Messianic.

If you read these few paragraphs you have already looked deeper than 99.9% of all christians who will not even look at or concider that there might have been something amiss.

CIF

Charles thanks for bringing this not only to my attention but to the worlds. i sense a maturity in you to be able to debate with because there are issues i have i would love to have your input on.

question about your lengthy post, did you cut and paste that or are you a great typist? If you have a link to the article online i would love to see it.. I want the truth but i also dont want to live in the past because the future is too glorious.. Plus my main occupation is trying to win souls,,, ;)
 
Upvote 0

Charlesinflorida

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2004
503
18
74
Florida, US
Visit site
✟753.00
Faith
Messianic
flyfishing said:
Charles thanks for bringing this not only to my attention but to the worlds. i sense a maturity in you to be able to debate with because there are issues i have i would love to have your input on.

question about your lengthy post, did you cut and paste that or are you a great typist? If you have a link to the article online i would love to see it.. I want the truth but i also dont want to live in the past because the future is too glorious.. Plus my main occupation is trying to win souls,,, ;)


That was a cut and paste and then I had to cut some parts out because it was to big for the posting limit. It is part of one chapter (12). I have a copy in my library but if you just Google "Luther, jews and their lies" you will find both full copies and excerpts.

I would encourage you to do a study on the church fathers and the origins of the christian religion. Many things are really Pagan in origin, like Christmas, which was really the celebration of Mithra the sun god of Rome which is considered reborn on Dec 25 when the days begin to get longer. Yeshua the Messiah was born on Tabernacles, which falls between late Sept and the middle of November on our calendar.


And Easter which was the feast of Ishatar the fertility godess of Rome. Even the way it was observed with decorrated eggs, and rolling the eggs accross the fields to embue fertility, and hiding them in Rabbit holes for fertility. Rabbits used as a fertility symbol ect. As you know Messiah was killed on Passover and was raised up on the feast of first fruits.

The church in Europe still observes st.Johns eve, where they throw their children through bon fires for purification, which is exactly on the same day that the children who were purified by Molek the fire god were made to pass through the fire, a practice that God specifically mentions as something that would separate his people from him.

Mary the mother godess is a cary over from ancient religions as well especially the babylonians who worshipped nimrod as a God and then desided to deify his mother as well, exactly as the church did. And to this day there are christians who will not pray to God or Jesus but pay only to Mary. In the eastern othodox and in some Roman sect, they parade her idol statues through the streets and lay flowers on her feet and kiss he cold stone toes.

I am sorry if this is an affront to anyone here, but I am stating only the truth. It must be exposed and not winked at. The Lord is returning for a pure bride without spot.
Another thing to examine when you google, look for Constantine and the christian church. He is the one who forced the merging of Paganism and christianity on penalty of death.

CIF
 
Upvote 0

TheScottsMen

Veteran
Jul 8, 2003
1,239
14
Minneapolis, MN
✟23,995.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I haven't studied enough on Holidays as should. But, if all Jewish Holidays were abolished for Gentile Christians, explain

The verse speaks of those who are left of all the nations who will fight against Jerusalem under the AntiChrist.

Zech. 14:16
And it shall come to pass, that every one that is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the King, the Lord of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles.

Would something be abolished yet to be returned?

And if the nations won't obey during when Christ is ruling with a rod of iron?

Zech. 14:17-18
And it shall be, that whoso will not come up of all the families of the earth unto Jerusalem to worship the King, the Lord of hosts, even upon them shall be no rain. [18] And if the family of Egypt go not up, and come not, that have no rain; there shall be the plague, wherewith the Lord will smite the heathen that come not up to keep the feast of tabernacles.

One other note for the sake of sakes;)Will the Sabbath be kept during the Millennium? Lets look at Isaiah 66:23

Isaiah 66:22-24
For as the new heavens and the new earth, which I will make, shall remain before me, saith the Lord, so shall your seed and your name remain. [23] And it shall come to pass, that from one new moon to another, and from one sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before me, saith the Lord. [24] And they shall go forth, and look upon the carcases of the men that have transgressed against me: for their worm shall not die, neither shall their fire be quenched; and they shall be an abhorring unto all flesh.

Just a thought;)
 
Upvote 0

Charlesinflorida

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2004
503
18
74
Florida, US
Visit site
✟753.00
Faith
Messianic
The scottsmen,

Yes, exactly. All the feasts of the lord are prophetically tied to Messiah usually in a three-fold-way. First in the actual historical events, such as the Passover from Egypt, then in the life of Messiah on earth when he was cruciied and lastly passover is a picture of the tribulation that will take place beore the return of the Lord.

There are important lesson to be learned from the feasts of the Lord and from repeating them year after year. We learn nothing from a Pagan based holiday. We do harm to ourselves. St. Nicholas, or Santa Claus, flying cattle, dancing snowmen, and whatever. Even the Christmas tree which is a Nimrod custom, requires that you place you gift under the tree for an ofering to nimrod, and then later kneel before this symbol to extract the gift. Thing is, God said ever so plainly, "You are not to worship me in the way (by the customs) that the pagans worship their Gods." And yet that is exactly what the church has done. It even made its brag about christianizing Pagan festivals and adding them to the christian religion in order to attract pagan converts.

I say, the Lord is God and I will do what he has commanded. The apostles kept these feasts. Paul make a comment about being very desirous to be in Jerusalem in time to celebrate the feast of unleavened bread with the believers. Paul also took part in a nazzarite vow, and offered sacrifices as prescribed. He also enouraged Timothy to be faithful to the traditions that he had learned as a child, which was Judaism and its festivals and sabbaths. Timothy was a gentile who was raised and trained by his Jewish grandmother.

CIF
 
Upvote 0

Trish1947

Free to Believe
Nov 14, 2003
7,645
411
78
California
Visit site
✟32,417.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
After reading this whole thread, and about Luther's opinions, sounds pretty satanic to me. I dont see the man, but I do see the spirit behind it. And that is who we have to deal with. You can start out on the right road, but if the devil can get his foot in, he'll make a mess out of the church every time. We are not supposed to be ignorant of his devices.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.