Appeals Court Judges Take Boasberg to Task, Delay Contempt Hearings Until 2026

[Valletta]

NEW: Appeals Court Judges Take Boasberg to Task, Delay Contempt Hearings Until 2026 | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

A federal appeals court on Monday took Judge Boasberg to task and delayed his contempt hearings until 2026.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Boasberg is wasting taxpayer money.

 

[Richard T]

NEW: Appeals Court Judges Take Boasberg to Task, Delay Contempt Hearings Until 2026 | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

A federal appeals court on Monday took Judge Boasberg to task and delayed his contempt hearings until 2026.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Boasberg is wasting taxpayer money.

Here is the msm version. Appeals court pauses contempt hearings over administration's AEA deportations
The case was put on hold, the decision was 2 to 1. Both of the two judges voting to delay were Trump appointees.

 

[Larniavc]

Both of the two judges voting to delay were Trump appointees.

Those darned activist judges.

 

[Postvieww]

. Both of the two judges voting to delay were Trump appointees

So are you saying the two Trump appointees used sound law mixed with common sense?

 

[camille70]

Boasberg orders return of Venezuelan deportees challenging Alien Enemies Act removal

“The Court finds that the only remedy that would give effect to its granting of Plaintiffs’ Motion would be to order the Government to undo the effects of their unlawful removal by facilitating a meaningful opportunity to contest their designation and the Proclamation’s validity. Otherwise, a finding of unlawful removal would be meaningless for Plaintiffs, who have already been sent back to Venezuela against their wishes and without due process,” Boasberg wrote.

“Expedited removal cannot be allowed to render this relief toothless. If secretly spiriting individuals to another country were enough to neuter the Great Writ, then ‘the Government could snatch anyone off the street, turn him over to a foreign country, and then effectively foreclose any corrective course of action.

The ruling gives the Trump administration until Jan. 5 “to facilitate the return of Plaintiffs to the United States or to otherwise provide them with hearings that satisfy the requirements of due process.”’”

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5660475-trump-administration-venezuelan-deportees-return-ruling/

 

[camille70]

BTW this court case is the reason Trump didn't want that 60 minutes report on CECOT to air. CBS sent it to their Canada affiliates though and it aired on their mobile app anyway and got released to the internet.

 

[Hans Blaster]

BTW this court case is the reason Trump didn't want that 60 minutes report on CECOT to air. CBS sent it to their Canada affiliates though and it aired on their mobile app anyway and got released to the internet.

Other than an interview with a former prisoner (one of the Venezuelans sent CECOT by Trump/Miller/Homan/Noem) the rest was all previously well reported. It would still be a revelation to many people on this forum (and probably this thread).

 

[Vambram]

Boasberg orders return of Venezuelan deportees challenging Alien Enemies Act removal

“The Court finds that the only remedy that would give effect to its granting of Plaintiffs’ Motion would be to order the Government to undo the effects of their unlawful removal by facilitating a meaningful opportunity to contest their designation and the Proclamation’s validity. Otherwise, a finding of unlawful removal would be meaningless for Plaintiffs, who have already been sent back to Venezuela against their wishes and without due process,” Boasberg wrote.

“Expedited removal cannot be allowed to render this relief toothless. If secretly spiriting individuals to another country were enough to neuter the Great Writ, then ‘the Government could snatch anyone off the street, turn him over to a foreign country, and then effectively foreclose any corrective course of action.

The ruling gives the Trump administration until Jan. 5 “to facilitate the return of Plaintiffs to the United States or to otherwise provide them with hearings that satisfy the requirements of due process.”’”

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5660475-trump-administration-venezuelan-deportees-return-ruling/

Boasberg doesn't have the authority that he thinks he does.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Boasberg doesn't have the authority that he thinks he does.

I would suggest that the Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia knows *exactly* how much authority he has.

 

[camille70]

Boasberg doesn't have the authority that he thinks he does.

Why are you against people getting due process?

 

[Vambram]

Why are you against people getting due process?

I'm not.

 

[Vambram]

I would suggest that the Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia knows *exactly* how much authority he has.

I know that this one district court judge is going to be overruled by a higher federal court.

 

[Hans Blaster]

I know that this one district court judge is going to be overruled by a higher federal court.

Are ya psychic?

 

[Vambram]

Are ya psychic?

No. But that judge has been overruled before.

 

[Hans Blaster]

No. But that judge has been overruled before.

As have all judges. None of which tells us that Chief Judge Boasberg has overstepped his authority.

 

[Pommer]

No. But that judge has been overruled before.

What would be the basis of a reverse?

 

[Vambram]

As have all judges. None of which tells us that Chief Judge Boasberg has overstepped his authority.

Boasberg has been overruled before, more than a few times. His decisions are based upon his leftist biases rather than what the Constitution and the laws says. He oversteps his authority as a district judge.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Boasberg has been overruled before, more than a few times. His decisions are based upon his leftist biases rather than what the Constitution and the laws says. He oversteps his authority as a district judge.

LOL. Boasberg is not a leftist.

 

[Vambram]

LOL. Boasberg is not a leftist.

Yes. He is.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Yes. He is.

Based on what evidence and heuristic do you think Boasberg is a "leftist"?