Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Anti intellectualism directed against science.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hans Blaster" data-source="post: 77157918" data-attributes="member: 396028"><p>You are making far more of "CRT" than it really is. You are also scrambling the academic CRT with a bunch of completely unrelated things. CRT (in any form) does not underpin history, sociology, or psyschology, and certainly not any STEM field.</p><p></p><p>This makes no sense.</p><p></p><p>You are giving "CRT" more space in your head than it deserves. making it more imporant than even it's advocates propose.</p><p></p><p>If you think this kind of thinking has any traction in science, you are wrong.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I once bought a book on the history of anti-intellectualism in America, but I now realize I never read it. (It's somewhere on my book pile.) So, I guess I'll have to make an educated guess: the Great Awakening.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, all superficial phenotypes. Tell me how does one determine who is "white" in America today? In 1950? In 1900? In 1850? Answer that question and you will know now mostly cultural race is.</p><p></p><p>Who says we should ignore biology and genetics in gender?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hans Blaster, post: 77157918, member: 396028"] You are making far more of "CRT" than it really is. You are also scrambling the academic CRT with a bunch of completely unrelated things. CRT (in any form) does not underpin history, sociology, or psyschology, and certainly not any STEM field. This makes no sense. You are giving "CRT" more space in your head than it deserves. making it more imporant than even it's advocates propose. If you think this kind of thinking has any traction in science, you are wrong. I once bought a book on the history of anti-intellectualism in America, but I now realize I never read it. (It's somewhere on my book pile.) So, I guess I'll have to make an educated guess: the Great Awakening. Again, all superficial phenotypes. Tell me how does one determine who is "white" in America today? In 1950? In 1900? In 1850? Answer that question and you will know now mostly cultural race is. Who says we should ignore biology and genetics in gender? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Anti intellectualism directed against science.
Top
Bottom