Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Answering a century-old question on the origins of life
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Subduction Zone" data-source="post: 76385909" data-attributes="member: 321072"><p>What makes you think that? You cannot blame the press for misinterpreting science. They are not experts at it and will make mistakes. But I think that it was more likely creationists that lied about the experiment. Creationists have a very hard time with the concept of evidence. It is clear that the positive results of the Miller-Urey experiment are evidence for abiogenesis. When your beliefs have no scientific evidence at all some fine the need to deny all scientific evidence from the opposition. </p><p></p><p>I do hope that you are aware that there is no scientific evidence for creationism.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Subduction Zone, post: 76385909, member: 321072"] What makes you think that? You cannot blame the press for misinterpreting science. They are not experts at it and will make mistakes. But I think that it was more likely creationists that lied about the experiment. Creationists have a very hard time with the concept of evidence. It is clear that the positive results of the Miller-Urey experiment are evidence for abiogenesis. When your beliefs have no scientific evidence at all some fine the need to deny all scientific evidence from the opposition. I do hope that you are aware that there is no scientific evidence for creationism. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Answering a century-old question on the origins of life
Top
Bottom