Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
...was Saul.
The snake story btw is really a fish story
Or maybe the Nobel Committee were waiting for the discovery of Dyson spheres built by super intelligent alien civilizations in which case Dyson would have won the Nobel Prize on the spot.Must be that infamous anti-Christian bias of the Nobel Committee.
So the only truth you know is that you can't know truth?I'm still puzzled how anyone can say they
know Truth, unless they are infallible, or,
at least, think they are.
Light that the Hubble Telescope has seen has taken 13 Billion years to arrive here on Earth. That's a very long time to be sure. The James Webb Telescope even further. As I was saying, the knowledge learned from those scientific instruments is helping to usher in a new Creation story that is counter to the Genesis story. Out with the old as it's replaced with the new.What would Hubble say about Jesus turning water into wine?
Hubble: It didn't happen. After all, it takes a long time to make wine.
Lol.Science doesn't care about the existence or non existence of God.
And?Twaddle, My theology lecturer used a much more earthy phrase to describe that argument in the 70s.
Was he incorrect?Paul was Paul.
How is that relevant to my post?I see that you quote Rushdoony. Are you a dominionist?
Light that the Hubble Telescope has seen has taken 13 Billion years to arrive here on Earth.
Is this the best you can do by making a snide remark which is even more unedifying when it comes from a moderator.Lol.
It’s not the best I could do. In fact, it’s the least I could do to point out the ridiculousness of your comment.Is this the best you can do by making a snide remark which is even more unedifying when it comes from a moderator.
Clearly you are not up to presenting counterarguments when I have demonstrated your comment that "Science has created a way to try to explain away God. Professing to be wise, they became fools." is pure bogus since God is unfalsifiable in science.
Militant atheists such as Steven Weinberg and the deeply religious Abdus Salam were able to collaborate and advance science to win the Nobel Prize in physics without having to care about the existence or non existence of God.
What is ridiculous here is a moderator resorting to flaming because he can’t comprehend God is unfalsifiable in science and is reduced to making silly petulant comments.It’s not the best I could do. In fact, it’s the least I could do to point out the ridiculousness of your comment.
As a scientist who is also happens to be a Christian your remark “Science has created a way to try to explain away God. Professing to be wise, they became fools.”, is based on ignorance and bigotry and refuted by the fact Christians can be scientists without renouncing their faith.
No, it’s based on observation.What is ridiculous here is a moderator resorting to flaming because he can’t comprehend God is unfalsifiable in science and is reduced to making silly petulant comments.
As a scientist who is also happens to be a Christian your remark “Science has created a way to try to explain away God. Professing to be wise, they became fools.”, is based on ignorance and bigotry and refuted by the fact Christians can be scientists without renouncing their faith.
Evolution is extremely flawed. There is not one example of an in-between skeleton of just two animals in all the fossils ever created. Best evolutionists can do is adaptation where finches have bigger beaks.The primary objection to evolution from creationists seems to be centered on human evolution specifically. For some reason the fact of sharing hereditary ancestry with other species causes creationists no end of grief.
However, if we didn't share ancestry with other species, why are we made of all the same 'stuff' as other animals? Especially in regards to our closest relatives (other primates), we share the same body plan, organs, cell structure, majority of our genetic makeup and so on.
If it was really important that we be distinct from other animal species, why didn't God make us wholly unique? Why not give us a completely unique physical makeup and genetic structure?
Evolution at least can explain this via genetic inheritance. Independent creation... not so much.
And before you say, "God just reused common parts":
a) Why would God reuse common parts in a manner that is perfectly consistent with genetic inheritance and biological evolution?
b) Why would it matter if we consider ourselves physically "related" to animals if we're all made from the same stuff to begin with?
I think it is fair to say that there are some atheists whom may be scientists who don't appreciate creationist attempts to degrade science in the hope of getting being able to thrust their views into the public schools and onto the public in general.No, it’s based on observation.
an in-between skeleton of just two animals
Evolution is extremely flawed. There is not one example of an in-between skeleton of just two animals in all the fossils ever created. Best evolutionists can do is adaptation where finches have bigger beaks.
There's a reason it's called the "missing" link, because it's missing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?