And why would that be so important to you in regard to this subject. I mean if I believe the Sun is 75 million miles away but we've been told it's 93 million why should I spend my life trying to prove the 75?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And why would that be so important to you in regard to this subject. I mean if I believe the Sun is 75 million miles away but we've been told it's 93 million why should I spend my life trying to prove the 75?I whole heartily believe this, but in the mean time we must not allow ourselves to be deceived.
I believe this is true....it would be harder to fake the Moon landing as compared to just going ahead and doing it.Evidence is truth which in this instant you have none.
So that would be proof to you that they didn't go because they wouldn't do this? First to even yield to the request would be to say you're on trial here so comply to my demands. Second many might feel they should yield to the statement of Jesus to swear not (like Jesus said Mt 5:37 ) but let your yes be yes and your No be No .Maybe this one then.
The Astronauts are asked to swear on the Bible that they went to moon.
Astronauts Gone Wild Documentary
Astronauts Gone Wild: An Investigation Into the Authenticity of the Moon Landings is a 2004 documentary film produced and directed by Bart Winfield Sibrel, a Nashville, Tennessee-based filmmaker who crumble.com
I believe this is true....it would be harder to fake the Moon landing as compared to just going ahead and doing it.
Only by calling thousands of people liars can you continue to insist that the moon landings were faked. That includes Christian astronauts whose Christian testimony includes mentions of their trip to the moon. You then say that pictures of the earth from the moon where distorted by fish-eye lenses or by the helmet visors or the portholes of the spacecraft, but seeing as you don't believe the moon landings took place, where are you saying these pictures were taken from?I don't believe this for one instance, if the moon landings were harder to fake why did they do it ? And succeeded in doing so.
I don't believe this for one instance, if the moon landings were harder to fake why did they do it ? And succeeded in doing so.
Maybe the question is why do you want to manage doing it? They did it about 6 times from 1969 and onwards for a few years. While they did it it's NOT an easy thing to do and costs lots of money. What's the payback for going there continually? While the going there was an incredible feat of achieving a goal, all humanity dreamed about....but what then? The agenda for space then switched to more practical things liked Skylab, and a Space station, and the Shuttle program and all had a real defined purpose.I find it peculiar that in 50 years, despite considerable advances in technology, no one has managed to land anyone on the moon since 1972.
You seem to be writing replies to posts which are several months old. I hope the reason for that is not that you have been ill, and unable to reply before.Maybe the question is why do you want to manage doing it? They did it about 6 times from 1969 and onwards for a few years. While they did it it's NOT an easy thing to do and costs lots of money. What's the payback for going there continually? While the going there was an incredible feat of achieving a goal, all humanity dreamed about....but what then? The agenda for space then switched to more practical things liked Skylab, and a Space station, and the Shuttle program and all had a real defined purpose.
Then there was Apollo 13....so what was that all about? So lets create this scam emergency get everybody in the world praying and longing to see them safely brought back....and all the while those at mission control were have a great big belly laugh at the world??? If only they knew the guys are safe and sound in the back room acting this out! I think for the reason that everyone from mission control being on camera and you don't see people laughing and smiling should tell you it was all true.No proof - means nothing.
Do you believe that NASA is made up of only half a dozen or so people, and they all sat in a room together and came up with the idea of lying to the world?
There are probably thousands of people who work at NASA, maybe from different countries. It would be almost impossible for everyone to agree to that "lie", to sustain it, remember what was said in previous meetings/interviews etc.
Know your place here. We're like lawyers here each arguing our case to the judge or jury. You don't get to make the conclusion . Nice try thoughI don't believe this for one instance, if the moon landings were harder to fake why did they do it ? And succeeded in doing so.
but seeing as you don't believe the moon landings took place, where are you saying these pictures were taken from?
Moonbase Alpha.Maybe the question is why do you want to manage doing it? They did it about 6 times from 1969 and onwards for a few years. While they did it it's NOT an easy thing to do and costs lots of money. What's the payback for going there continually? While the going there was an incredible feat of achieving a goal, all humanity dreamed about....but what then? The agenda for space then switched to more practical things liked Skylab, and a Space station, and the Shuttle program and all had a real defined purpose.
We're like lawyers here each arguing our case to the judge or jury.
I don't thing computer-generated images existed in 1969 when the first moon landing happened. Besides, we have the testimony of the astronauts who have been, including some Christians.The thermosphere, thats of course if they are real & not CGI.
The moon landing was not a fake. It actually happened six times and a near miss.I don't believe this for one instance, if the moon landings were harder to fake why did they do it ? And succeeded in doing so.
The moon landing was not a fake. It actually happened six times and a near miss.
I don't thing computer-generated images existed in 1969
Apollo 13What was the near miss ?
I’m surprised that you have not heard. There is even a movie about it. Anyway an oxygen tank exploded on the way to the moon and they were forced to circle the moon and come back home. The astronauts almost died.Thanks, what happened ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?