Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Another Flood Question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Justatruthseeker" data-source="post: 71988856" data-attributes="member: 332164"><p>Because you brought up the K-T boundary, but didn’t feel it necessary to inform readers of that 3 meter gap.....</p><p></p><p></p><p>I am citing the actual evidence in where not a single animal has been found fossilizing, despite all your professors saying it can happen by those events, yet can’t provide you with a single solitary example. Sorry, empericial observational data (or in this case lack thereof) trumps your professors claims any day. They are strong on claims, but far short of any actual evidence.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>How can I present evidence that fossilization is occurring when it isn’t? That’s your claim you can’t provide evidence for, not mine. I say it isn’t, since you can’t provide a single one beginning fossilization, the evidence supports my claims, not theirs. Surely all your experts based their belief on some type of evidence and not mere claims? Oops, no, they just made claims.</p><p></p><p></p><p>You haven’t shown any evidence, that’s why I am asking for you to show me a single solitary one beginning fossilization. All you have given me is someone you say has studied it, is an expert, yet can’t provide a single example either...</p><p></p><p>As for other evidence that goes back to your ignoring scientific definitions, which support my claims too, not theirs. That’s why you don’t like to talk about finches.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I’ve given you 73% of the earths surface as sedimentary layers. I’ve given you 99.9% of all fossils found in those layers.</p><p></p><p>You have given me claims that local floods, streams and lake beds cause fossilization too. But have yet to provide a single bone beginning fossilization in any of these places in recent history we can confirm was not caused by a global flood.</p><p></p><p>Not even ONE????</p><p></p><p>Oh, but that’s right, lack of evidence is evidence to an evolutionist. That’s like asking to be shown a single solitary common ancestor that split for any evolutionary tree.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Justatruthseeker, post: 71988856, member: 332164"] Because you brought up the K-T boundary, but didn’t feel it necessary to inform readers of that 3 meter gap..... I am citing the actual evidence in where not a single animal has been found fossilizing, despite all your professors saying it can happen by those events, yet can’t provide you with a single solitary example. Sorry, empericial observational data (or in this case lack thereof) trumps your professors claims any day. They are strong on claims, but far short of any actual evidence. How can I present evidence that fossilization is occurring when it isn’t? That’s your claim you can’t provide evidence for, not mine. I say it isn’t, since you can’t provide a single one beginning fossilization, the evidence supports my claims, not theirs. Surely all your experts based their belief on some type of evidence and not mere claims? Oops, no, they just made claims. You haven’t shown any evidence, that’s why I am asking for you to show me a single solitary one beginning fossilization. All you have given me is someone you say has studied it, is an expert, yet can’t provide a single example either... As for other evidence that goes back to your ignoring scientific definitions, which support my claims too, not theirs. That’s why you don’t like to talk about finches. I’ve given you 73% of the earths surface as sedimentary layers. I’ve given you 99.9% of all fossils found in those layers. You have given me claims that local floods, streams and lake beds cause fossilization too. But have yet to provide a single bone beginning fossilization in any of these places in recent history we can confirm was not caused by a global flood. Not even ONE???? Oh, but that’s right, lack of evidence is evidence to an evolutionist. That’s like asking to be shown a single solitary common ancestor that split for any evolutionary tree. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Another Flood Question
Top
Bottom