• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Another Dire Reformation Is Needed

Tellastory

Hebrews 13:13
Mar 10, 2013
780
43
In God's Hand
✟23,686.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
1 Corinthians 11:27 Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. 28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup. 29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body. 30 For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep. 31 For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged. 32 But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world.

How do you not know that taking the bread at communion under the belief that Christ's Presence is in it is not a part of Paul's warning? Look at what Paul had said before that chapter.

1 Corinthians 10:14 Wherefore, my dearly beloved, flee from idolatry. 15 I speak as to wise men; judge ye what I say. 16 The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ? 17 For we being many are one bread, and one body: for we are all partakers of that one bread. 18 Behold Israel after the flesh: are not they which eat of the sacrifices partakers of the altar? 19 What say I then? that the idol is any thing, or that which is offered in sacrifice to idols is any thing? 20 But I say, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God: and I would not that ye should have fellowship with devils. 21 Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils: ye cannot be partakers of the Lord's table, and of the table of devils. 22 Do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? are we stronger than he? 23 All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but all things edify not.

For anyone to claim they are consecrating the bread & wine at communion to contain His Presence is to testify that they are stronger than the Lord to make this happen.

And yet other scripture would reprove such notions that there ever was a "presence" in the bread & the wine, and thus truly symbolic.

Matthew 24:23 Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.

2 Corinthians 13:5 Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates?

The above reference is what 1 John 4:2 is talking about in testing the spirits.

1 John 4:1Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. 2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God: 3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world. 4 Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.

Many believers think John was referring to any doubting that Jesus had come in the flesh at all, but not so. This is about testing the spirits and the use of the term "is come" means presently as in where He abides.

So in according to our faith that Jesus Christ is in us and that which is outside of us is the spirit of the antichrist, the Eucharist is an unclean thing because it has become an idol.

That which was made by man, bread, and treating it as a living "god" is an idol.

That is why Jesus & Paul had said to do communion in remembrance of Him, because you cannot receive Jesus "again".

2 Corinthians 11:3 But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. 4 For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him.

There is no way the Eucharist can avoid these scripture as reproofs.

Protestants should drop the term sacrament because the bread and the wine are not sacred: it is taking it in remembrance of what He has done is the ordinance to follow.

1 Thessalonians 5:21 Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. 22 Abstain from all appearance of evil. 23 And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. 24 Faithful is he that calleth you, who also will do it.

If Lutherans are to expect Catholics to question their practises in according to the scripture, then Lutherans should lead by example in the event that they are carryings some things over from catholicism that they should not have.

John 6:33 For the bread of God is he which cometh down from heaven, and giveth life unto the world. 34 Then said they unto him, Lord, evermore give us this bread. 35 And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.

Never in John 6th chapter was Jesus talking about communion but how we are saved, and that is by coming to & believing in Jesus Christ. The RCC based their doctrine on what Jesus said to the Pharisees and not on what He had said to His disciples in that chapter and He did point out to His disciples what He did to the Pharisees that they did not all believe that.

John 6:36 But I said unto you, That ye also have seen me, and believe not.

John 6:61 When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said unto them, Doth this offend you? 62 What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before? 63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life. 64 But there are some of you that believe not. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him.

So Lutherans as well as Protestants are due for another reformation if they expect Catholics to see clearly their error by His grace & by His help.
 

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
30,969
5,798
✟1,001,274.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Lutherans like Catholics believe the truth that Christ's body and blood are truly present in the Eucharist; and that in reception of the Eucharist we not only eat and drink His body and blood, but we receive with it not only the gracious forgiveness of sins, but spiritual and physical healing.

The Eucharist transcends time and space and is where heaven and earth come together with our Lord Jesus Christ.

For those who believe otherwise, it seems to me that, the Eucharist is pointless.
 
Upvote 0

Tangible

Decision Theology = Ex Opere Operato
May 29, 2009
9,837
1,416
cruce tectum
Visit site
✟67,243.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Not sure where the OP is coming from on this. Is he denying the Real Presence outright, or is he claiming that only RCC sacraments are valid?

Perhaps he will state his position more succinctly.
 
Upvote 0

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
30,969
5,798
✟1,001,274.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Not sure where the OP is coming from on this. Is he denying the Real Presence outright, or is he claiming that only RCC sacraments are valid?

Perhaps he will state his position more succinctly.

So Lutherans as well as Protestants are due for another reformation if they expect Catholics to see clearly their error by His grace & by His help.

It's my take that he's saying that non Catholics need to present a united front against sacramental theology so that Catholics can be straightened out.
 
Upvote 0

Targaryen

Scripture,Tradition and Reason
Jul 13, 2014
3,431
558
Canada
✟36,699.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-NDP
Hmm, I guess that Anglicans, Methodists,Presbyterians,United Church of Christ members as well as Orthodox and Catholics are all backwards in signifying the Real Presence, whether spiritual and corporal, or just plain spiritual.

Sorry but no...I tend to side with the ones that have a proper understanding of the Sacrament.
 
Upvote 0

Tangible

Decision Theology = Ex Opere Operato
May 29, 2009
9,837
1,416
cruce tectum
Visit site
✟67,243.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
So Lutherans as well as Protestants are due for another reformation if they expect Catholics to see clearly their error by His grace & by His help.
It's my take that he's saying that non Catholics need to present a united front against sacramental theology so that Catholics can be straightened out.
I guess it depends on who "they" are.
 
Upvote 0

Hawkiz

Newbie
Dec 3, 2013
353
119
✟24,036.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
1 Corinthians 11:27 Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. 28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup. 29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body. 30 For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep. 31 For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged. 32 But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world.

How do you not know that taking the bread at communion under the belief that Christ's Presence is in it is not a part of Paul's warning? Look at what Paul had said before that chapter.

1 Corinthians 10:14 Wherefore, my dearly beloved, flee from idolatry. 15 I speak as to wise men; judge ye what I say. 16 The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ? 17 For we being many are one bread, and one body: for we are all partakers of that one bread. 18 Behold Israel after the flesh: are not they which eat of the sacrifices partakers of the altar? 19 What say I then? that the idol is any thing, or that which is offered in sacrifice to idols is any thing? 20 But I say, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God: and I would not that ye should have fellowship with devils. 21 Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils: ye cannot be partakers of the Lord's table, and of the table of devils. 22 Do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? are we stronger than he? 23 All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but all things edify not.

For anyone to claim they are consecrating the bread & wine at communion to contain His Presence is to testify that they are stronger than the Lord to make this happen.

And yet other scripture would reprove such notions that there ever was a "presence" in the bread & the wine, and thus truly symbolic.

Matthew 24:23 Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.

2 Corinthians 13:5 Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates?

The above reference is what 1 John 4:2 is talking about in testing the spirits.

1 John 4:1Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. 2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God: 3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world. 4 Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.

Many believers think John was referring to any doubting that Jesus had come in the flesh at all, but not so. This is about testing the spirits and the use of the term "is come" means presently as in where He abides.

So in according to our faith that Jesus Christ is in us and that which is outside of us is the spirit of the antichrist, the Eucharist is an unclean thing because it has become an idol.

That which was made by man, bread, and treating it as a living "god" is an idol.

That is why Jesus & Paul had said to do communion in remembrance of Him, because you cannot receive Jesus "again".

2 Corinthians 11:3 But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. 4 For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him.

There is no way the Eucharist can avoid these scripture as reproofs.

Protestants should drop the term sacrament because the bread and the wine are not sacred: it is taking it in remembrance of what He has done is the ordinance to follow.

1 Thessalonians 5:21 Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. 22 Abstain from all appearance of evil. 23 And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. 24 Faithful is he that calleth you, who also will do it.

If Lutherans are to expect Catholics to question their practises in according to the scripture, then Lutherans should lead by example in the event that they are carryings some things over from catholicism that they should not have.

John 6:33 For the bread of God is he which cometh down from heaven, and giveth life unto the world. 34 Then said they unto him, Lord, evermore give us this bread. 35 And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.

Never in John 6th chapter was Jesus talking about communion but how we are saved, and that is by coming to & believing in Jesus Christ. The RCC based their doctrine on what Jesus said to the Pharisees and not on what He had said to His disciples in that chapter and He did point out to His disciples what He did to the Pharisees that they did not all believe that.

John 6:36 But I said unto you, That ye also have seen me, and believe not.

John 6:61 When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said unto them, Doth this offend you? 62 What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before? 63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life. 64 But there are some of you that believe not. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him.

So Lutherans as well as Protestants are due for another reformation if they expect Catholics to see clearly their error by His grace & by His help.


You do realize what the definition of 'discerning' is don't you? It means to recognize as different.

St. Paul says that those who fail to recognize that Christ IS PRESENT in the bread and wine eat and drink damnation upon themselves. To fail to see that the bread and wine are different is to eat and drink condemnation upon yourself. THAT is what the verse actually says. This isn't 'my interpretation' of Scripture, but it IS exactly what the words say.

The real question is how you can use this passage to 'prove' that the words don't say what they say?

Peace in Christ
 
Upvote 0

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
30,969
5,798
✟1,001,274.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
You do realize what the definition of 'discerning' is don't you? It means to recognize as different.

St. Paul says that those who fail to recognize that Christ IS PRESENT in the bread and wine eat and drink damnation upon themselves. To fail to see that the bread and wine are different is to eat and drink condemnation upon yourself. THAT is what the verse actually says. This isn't 'my interpretation' of Scripture, but it IS exactly what the words say.

The real question is how you can use this passage to 'prove' that the words don't say what they say?

Peace in Christ

Indeed!:thumbsup::thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

cajunhillbilly

Regular Member
Jul 4, 2004
870
37
72
Dallas, TX
✟24,022.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Politics
US-Republican
Sorry but after reading the early church fathers and even the early Reformers, I can only conclude that the Real Presence is exactly what is taught in Scripture. Not the Zwinglian Memorial Only view. I can not understand someone denying the Real Presence
 
Upvote 0

Knee V

It's phonetic.
Sep 17, 2003
8,417
1,741
43
South Bend, IN
✟115,823.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
So Lutherans as well as Protestants are due for another reformation if they expect Catholics to see clearly their error by His grace & by His help.

If by "reformation" you mean "become Orthodox", then yep, I agree. ;)
 
Upvote 0

Knee V

It's phonetic.
Sep 17, 2003
8,417
1,741
43
South Bend, IN
✟115,823.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Sorry but after reading the early church fathers and even the early Reformers, I can only conclude that the Real Presence is exactly what is taught in Scripture. Not the Zwinglian Memorial Only view. I can not understand someone denying the Real Presence

Additionally, I cannot separate the Eucharist being the very body and blood of Christ from an overall orthodoxy; there is no orthodox Christian faith apart from the Eucharist.
 
Upvote 0
C

catholichomeschooler

Guest
1 Corinthians 11:27 Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. 28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup. 29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body. 30 For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep. 31 For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged. 32 But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world.

How do you not know that taking the bread at communion under the belief that Christ's Presence is in it is not a part of Paul's warning? Look at what Paul had said before that chapter.

1 Corinthians 10:14 Wherefore, my dearly beloved, flee from idolatry. 15 I speak as to wise men; judge ye what I say. 16 The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ? 17 For we being many are one bread, and one body: for we are all partakers of that one bread. 18 Behold Israel after the flesh: are not they which eat of the sacrifices partakers of the altar? 19 What say I then? that the idol is any thing, or that which is offered in sacrifice to idols is any thing? 20 But I say, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God: and I would not that ye should have fellowship with devils. 21 Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils: ye cannot be partakers of the Lord's table, and of the table of devils. 22 Do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? are we stronger than he? 23 All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but all things edify not.

For anyone to claim they are consecrating the bread & wine at communion to contain His Presence is to testify that they are stronger than the Lord to make this happen.

And yet other scripture would reprove such notions that there ever was a "presence" in the bread & the wine, and thus truly symbolic.

Matthew 24:23 Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.

2 Corinthians 13:5 Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates?

The above reference is what 1 John 4:2 is talking about in testing the spirits.

1 John 4:1Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. 2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God: 3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world. 4 Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.

Many believers think John was referring to any doubting that Jesus had come in the flesh at all, but not so. This is about testing the spirits and the use of the term "is come" means presently as in where He abides.

So in according to our faith that Jesus Christ is in us and that which is outside of us is the spirit of the antichrist, the Eucharist is an unclean thing because it has become an idol.

That which was made by man, bread, and treating it as a living "god" is an idol.

That is why Jesus & Paul had said to do communion in remembrance of Him, because you cannot receive Jesus "again".

2 Corinthians 11:3 But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. 4 For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him.

There is no way the Eucharist can avoid these scripture as reproofs.

Protestants should drop the term sacrament because the bread and the wine are not sacred: it is taking it in remembrance of what He has done is the ordinance to follow.

1 Thessalonians 5:21 Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. 22 Abstain from all appearance of evil. 23 And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. 24 Faithful is he that calleth you, who also will do it.

If Lutherans are to expect Catholics to question their practises in according to the scripture, then Lutherans should lead by example in the event that they are carryings some things over from catholicism that they should not have.

John 6:33 For the bread of God is he which cometh down from heaven, and giveth life unto the world. 34 Then said they unto him, Lord, evermore give us this bread. 35 And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.

Never in John 6th chapter was Jesus talking about communion but how we are saved, and that is by coming to & believing in Jesus Christ. The RCC based their doctrine on what Jesus said to the Pharisees and not on what He had said to His disciples in that chapter and He did point out to His disciples what He did to the Pharisees that they did not all believe that.

John 6:36 But I said unto you, That ye also have seen me, and believe not.

John 6:61 When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said unto them, Doth this offend you? 62 What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before? 63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life. 64 But there are some of you that believe not. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him.

So Lutherans as well as Protestants are due for another reformation if they expect Catholics to see clearly their error by His grace & by His help.

Christians should all return to the Church Jesus started. No one doubted the reality of Christ's presence in the Eucharist for at least 1000 years. The early Christians are unanimous on this point. The Catholic Church(and Orthodox Churches) has never changed this teaching of the apostles.
 
Upvote 0
B

bbbbbbb

Guest
Christians should all return to the Church Jesus started. No one doubted the reality of Christ's presence in the Eucharist for at least 1000 years. The early Christians are unanimous on this point. The Catholic Church(and Orthodox Churches) has never changed this teaching of the apostles.

So, which of the Orthodox Churches, in your opinion, is the one that Jesus started?
 
Upvote 0

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
30,969
5,798
✟1,001,274.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
The Orthodox Churches and the Catholic Church were one Church. They split. Which one is the original is debatable, but neither groups denies our common beginnings.

If that is the only criterion, then Lutherans, Anglicans and Calvinists would also fit.:);)
 
Upvote 0
B

bbbbbbb

Guest
Protestants left the Catholic Church. They were former Catholics It is different than the Catholic/Orthodox split.

Nice try. :thumbsup:

It depends on who you talk to. This is what newadvent.org has to say about it - CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Eastern Schism

There are plenty of people on either side of the Schism who would point the finger at the other side and accuse them.
 
Upvote 0

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
30,969
5,798
✟1,001,274.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Protestants left the Catholic Church. They were former Catholics It is different than the Catholic/Orthodox split.

Nice try. :thumbsup:

It depends on who you talk to. This is what newadvent.org has to say about it - CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Eastern Schism

There are plenty of people on either side of the Schism who would point the finger at the other side and accuse them.

Such depends on one's POV. Read the Augsburg Confession; The Lutherans confessed, believed and practiced the catholic faith under Rome; it was Rome which excommunicated us; we did not leave; we got the ecclesiastical boot in our parochial rear ends. Such is historic fact.

Blessings my friend.:)
 
Upvote 0