Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Ann Coulter: Knowing What We Know Now, Would You Say Jeb Bush is ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NightHawkeye" data-source="post: 67541119" data-attributes="member: 265226"><p><a href="http://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2015/05/20/knowing-what-we-know-now-would-you-say-jeb-bush-is-retarded-n2001830" target="_blank">Knowing What We Know Now, Would You Say Jeb Bush is ? | TownHall</a></p><p></p><p>(Mod EDIT removed a key negative descriptor provided by Ann Coulter relating to Jeb Bush's thought processes.)</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px"><em>This is why all six of Jeb Bush's answers to Fox News Channel's Megyn Kelly -- as well as Marco Rubio's premeditated answer a week later -- were ridiculous. It's annoying enough having liberals invent these historical fantasies. Do our fearsome Republicans have to keep retelling them, too? If they don't follow the news, can't they read? </em></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><em></em></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><em>Kelly asked Bush: "Knowing what we know now, would you have authorized the invasion?" </em></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><em></em></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><em>The correct answer is: </em></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><em></em></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><em>Now that we know that a half-century of Teddy Kennedy's 1965 Immigration Act would result in a country where a man like Barack Obama could be elected president, and then, purely out of antipathy to America, would withdraw every last troop from Iraq, nullifying America's victory and plunging the entire region into chaos, no, I would not bother removing dangerous despots in order to make America safer. </em></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><em></em></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><em>Instead, I would dedicate myself to overturning our immigration laws, ending the anchor-baby scam and building a triple-layer fence on the border, so that some future Republican president could invade Iraq without worrying about a foreign-elected president like Obama coming in and giving it away.</em></p><p></p><p>Ann Coulter makes a well-reasoned argument.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NightHawkeye, post: 67541119, member: 265226"] [URL='http://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2015/05/20/knowing-what-we-know-now-would-you-say-jeb-bush-is-retarded-n2001830']Knowing What We Know Now, Would You Say Jeb Bush is ? | TownHall[/URL] (Mod EDIT removed a key negative descriptor provided by Ann Coulter relating to Jeb Bush's thought processes.) [INDENT][I]This is why all six of Jeb Bush's answers to Fox News Channel's Megyn Kelly -- as well as Marco Rubio's premeditated answer a week later -- were ridiculous. It's annoying enough having liberals invent these historical fantasies. Do our fearsome Republicans have to keep retelling them, too? If they don't follow the news, can't they read? Kelly asked Bush: "Knowing what we know now, would you have authorized the invasion?" The correct answer is: Now that we know that a half-century of Teddy Kennedy's 1965 Immigration Act would result in a country where a man like Barack Obama could be elected president, and then, purely out of antipathy to America, would withdraw every last troop from Iraq, nullifying America's victory and plunging the entire region into chaos, no, I would not bother removing dangerous despots in order to make America safer. Instead, I would dedicate myself to overturning our immigration laws, ending the anchor-baby scam and building a triple-layer fence on the border, so that some future Republican president could invade Iraq without worrying about a foreign-elected president like Obama coming in and giving it away.[/I][/INDENT] Ann Coulter makes a well-reasoned argument. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Ann Coulter: Knowing What We Know Now, Would You Say Jeb Bush is ?
Top
Bottom