An international treaty on pandemic prevention and preparedness

[JustSomeBloke]

An international treaty on pandemic prevention and preparedness

Ever since covid came along, I've been wondering if World Government would be introduced under the guise of 'keeping everyone healthy'. If countries sign up to this treaty, then when the next pandemic comes along, elected governments will simply be acting as puppets, doing whatever the WHO tells them to do.

C.S Lewis tried to warn us about this.

 

[timothyu]

Beyond the concept of those enmeshed in their own local politics. The idea of entire nations being incorporated rather than businesses is not fathomable to some who think governments must be political.

 

[bekkilyn]

The globalist elites have been using each successive crisis to grab more and more power and it's ramping up now in high speed.

Even this latest crisis with Russia and Ukraine, I've been hearing talk about how Putin has united the west or united NATO or united Europe, etc. and such comments inspired me to wonder if perhaps there was some globalist intentionality to all of it. Suppose the WEF convinced Putin to attack in order to move forward the globalist agenda? Perhaps promising him Ukraine in the process to allow himself to appear as an enemy when the reality is that they're all working together. Many of us have heard by now the Ukraine government lady who made a statement to the press who dropped the line that she was "fighting for a New World Order". Why would she say that? Why wouldn't she say that she was fighting for Ukraine?

So we have a global-based pandemic response that would likely end up requiring global vaccine passports, possibly microchips, and all sorts of requirements that destroy the privacy of individual citizens.

A small elite group of people claiming to work for the "common good" must not be allowed to destroy the sovereignty of nations and the individual liberty of private citizens. That's all the very worst aspects of socialism.

"You will own nothing and you will be happy."

Heh, it's even crossed my mind to wonder if maybe Zalensky would turn out to be the Anti-Christ provided that certain interpretations of biblical prophecy prove correct. He ends up getting some huge head wound during one of the Russian attacks and then miraculously comes back to life.

Even without anything religious or prophetic though, unless this global pandemic treaty has very strong clauses that each country retains their sovereignty and choice concerning medical mandates and treatments, it's very dangerous considering how much government overreach and outright tyranny we've had in our countries without one. Who knows what sorts of experimental substances a global organization could pump into each and every person worldwide the next time, and we can be very well assured that there will indeed be a next time.

 

[timothyu]

Perhaps promising him Ukraine in the process to allow himself to appear as an enemy when the reality is that they're all working together.

Indeed. Corporatism operates on a different platform than old school political warfare. People need to catch up.

 

[Sparagmos]

Many of us have heard by now the Ukraine government lady who made a statement to the press who dropped the line that she was "fighting for a New World Order". Why would she say that? Why wouldn't she say that she was fighting for Ukraine?

She did.
“I don’t have any plans to leave, this is my city, this is my country, and I plan to defend it for as long as will be needed.

“There is no chance that some Russian crazy dictator would be able to push me away from where I live and where I love.”

“We received rifles in the Ukrainian parliament and for the last couple of days I was training to use it, so right now I’m pretty confident I would be able to shoot somebody if they come to my home,” she said.

“I assembled a resistance crew which now consists of 15 people, and we were able to stand up for ourselves and help our army patrol the streets.”

Suppose the WEF convinced Putin to attack in order to move forward the globalist agenda? Perhaps promising him Ukraine in the process to allow himself to appear as an enemy when the reality is that they're all working together.

How, specifically, does the WEF promise someone a country? Did they vote on it? Who delivered the message? Did they inform their members of this action? Why aren’t any of them siding with Putin, then? Why are their members involved, via sanctions and deplatforming, in opposing Putin right now?

Are you just repeating conspiracy theories you’ve heard or can you actually lay out what exactly you’re talking about and back it up with facts?

 

[timothyu]

Why are their members involved, via sanctions and deplatforming, in opposing Putin right now?

Another test run to see if economics can indeed control a nation into compliance? Testing out the ability to buy and sell upon a nation rather than an individual?

 

[Sparagmos]

Another test run to see if economics can indeed control a nation into compliance? Testing out the ability to buy and sell upon a nation rather than an individual?

But the claim made by the poster I responded to was that the WEF had "promised" Ukraine to Putin. So that’s completely contradictory. Also, we already know economic sanctions are an effective tool, it doesn’t need to be tested.

 

[timothyu]

Also, we already know economic sanctions are an effective tool, it doesn’t need to be tested.

The far reaching effects on globalism and finance outside Russia of what would be extreme measures in this case... has such a test been done previously? How far can the system go without damaging itself?

 

[Sparagmos]

The far reaching effects on globalism and finance outside Russia of what would be extreme measures in this case... has such a test been done previously? How far can the system go without damaging itself?

I’m sorry can you be more specific? What is it you think is being tested? What do you mean be the effects on globalism and finance?

 

[timothyu]

What do you mean be the effects on globalism and finance?

How far can the globalist system disrupt itself before suffering lashback? Usually all cogs of an incorporated machine must mesh. As you know wars and deaths of innocents have always served somebody seeking profitability.

 

[Sparagmos]

How far can the globalist system disrupt itself before suffering lashback? Usually all cogs of an incorporated machine must mesh. As you know wars and deaths of innocents have always served somebody seeking profitability.

That’s still not specific. That’s incredibly vague. Are you saying that the many sanctions against Russia could disrupt things to the extent that the “disruption” is worse than the positive effects of the sanctions? In what way? Why would what happens with Russia necessarily be a good “test” for other countries? For instance, doing the same to China wouldn’t be the same at all. It would be really nice if you could talk specifics with examples.