Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
DNA is self-checking, self-repairing, self-copying, and if it is damaged beyond repair, can self-destruct. It can replace missing data.
Think what it must have been like before a few thousand years of degeneration, when there were giants and man lived to a thousand years.
Natural processes are limited.
That's why scientists looking for intelligence are looking for simple things. A straight line, a series of numbers or other repeating pattern. Kind of like you find in DNA.
DNA is self-checking, self-repairing, self-copying, and if it is damaged beyond repair, can self-destruct.
It can replace missing data.
Think what it must have been like before a few thousand years of degeneration, when there were giants and man lived to a thousand years.
Natural processes are limited. That's why scientists looking for intelligence are looking for simple things. A straight line, a series of numbers or other repeating pattern. Kind of like you find in DNA.
1. All of those are false. If you have pure DNA in solution it can't check anything, does not self repair, does not copy itself, and does not self destruct.
2. Also, you still haven't explained how this is evidence for evolution.
3. What giants? Evidence please.
1. An AI or program on CD does nothing either. They run on a computer, and DNA works only in a cell, as designed.
2. Only intelligence can create language or codes. They are not spontaneous, and cannot be arrived at in stages or by accident.
3. Try looking up megafauna. You will find animals like these:
If you mean giant men in particular..
A giant mystery: 18 strange giant skeletons found in Wisconsin: Sons of god; Men of renown -- Sott.net
DNA, RNA, and proteins working together produce what we see in cells. That is what you are missing. It is proteins using RNA and DNA as templates that repairs DNA. DNA doesn't repair itself. When there is no complementary sequence in a DNA strand to use as template, the proteins can't reproduce the DNA that used to be there. That is another thing you have wrong. DNA repair is either copying the complementary strand of the double helix of DNA, or inserting new DNA where DNA from both strands has been removed.
Bare assertion.
What you don't see is any evidence that there were ever giant humans.
There were tons of known hoaxes during that time. You need to present the actual bones and some science to back your claims.
I find the argument presented in this video very compelling:
2. Just as abiogenesis is an assertion. Life comes from life, intelligence from intelligence, and it requires intelligence to create code or language.
3. That is because you differentiate giants from people. At what point do they change? How tall before you stop believing in them?
4. You know well that early museums and pro-evolution 'scientists' hid, destroyed or tried to discredit anything that put their theory's credibility at risk.
I find the argument presented in this video very compelling:
Still waiting for evidence that only an intelligence can create a code or language.
How long before you start presenting real evidence? [on giants]
Again, these are just assertions. You need evidence.
There is no proving a negative.
Show me one code or language that spontaneously arose.
SETI is waiting.
I gave plenty of evidence on giants, some still living. Your disbelief doesn't make them disappear.
And what kind of evidence do you think there would be of a cover-up done by an organization like the Smithsonian?
Not much, except maybe articles of items going in, never to be seen again. Those that don't get erased, get discredited. Ica stones for example. Blamed on a poor, small group of villagers, when there is no way they had the ability, much less time to carve all of them.
You cited known hoaxes. That doesn't count.
Only dishonest people cite Ica stones as real artifacts.
Last post to you until you learn manners.
Robert Wadlow is a hoax? It's easy to claim something when you don't bother reading it.
Only dishonest people...
Invincible ignorance fallacy - WikipediaThat video disproves ID/creationism. It is self evident.
1. An AI or program on CD does nothing either. They run on a computer, and DNA works only in a cell, as designed.
2. Only intelligence can create language or codes. They are not spontaneous, and cannot be arrived at in stages or by accident.
3. Try looking up megafauna. You will find animals like these:
If you mean giant men in particular..
A giant mystery: 18 strange giant skeletons found in Wisconsin: Sons of god; Men of renown -- Sott.net
Something to make you want to find a nice cave to live in, as opposed to houses. So-called cave men didn't choose caves because they were too dumb to build.
I find the argument presented in this video very compelling:
The simple isometric scaling of the skeletons should tell you they're not real. Allometry will tell you why - "Isometric scaling is governed by the square-cube law. An organism which doubles in length isometrically will find that the surface area available to it will increase fourfold, while its volume and mass will increase by a factor of eight."
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?