Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Romans 1:20
New International Version
For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.
But perceiving them does not guarantee any particular theory of how divine providence is expressed in the material world, even yours.There is no excuse for claiming not to perceive them.
But perceiving them does not guarantee any particular theory of how divine providence is expressed in the material world, even yours.
That you quote Romans 1:20 as if it validated your particular theory about how God created and sustains the universe. It doesn't.Divine Providence? My material world? Please clarify so I can understand exactly what it is that you as an Anglican are striving to prove.
There is nothing anti-biblical in detecting intelligent design in nature.
We don't know that nature had a beginning. We only know that our universe had a beginning.
No, I mean the SB of those who cunningly refuse to acknowledge the very obvious compelling indications of intelligent design in nature.
Romans 1:20
New International Version
For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.
Ignoring posts, claiming lack of ability to understand means nothing.Remind us again, what those indications are, specifically?
A link to a post where you explain it, is fine as well.
Loudmouth likes to repeatedly repeat and then when explanations are offered to declare total inability to understand and then repeat a request again. Sound familiar? It should since you do the same.That's just a repeat of your claim, that "there are indications".
Loudmouth asked you WHAT those indications are. He didn't ask for a bible verse that basically repeats the empty assertion.
Ignoring posts,
Why not instead meticulously explain exactly how your mindless chemical decided that DNA would need self repair and then went about constructing the means and providing the sequences for that self repair to take place
Also, explain how the DNA was managing BEFORE that repair system magically arose.
Loudmouth likes to repeatedly repeat and then when explanations are offered
to declare total inability to understand and then repeat a request again. Sound familiar? It should since you do the same.
I'ld even dare to say that we don't even really know that the universe had a beginning...
Space-time had a beginning, in the sense that it "started" to expand.
But I don't think that physicists have conclusive evidence that the universe itself "began to exist", as opposed to, for example, just changed in form/state.
Our current knowledge of physics doesn't allow us to "look back" at T = 0... it breaks down at planck time... so how could we know (at this point)?
Loudmouth likes to repeatedly repeat and then when explanations are offered to declare total inability to understand and then repeat a request again. Sound familiar? It should since you do the same.
Ignoring posts, claiming lack of ability to understand means nothing.
How so?
Why is that evidence for intelligent design? Why can't nature produce something complex through natural processes?
I'ld even dare to say that we don't even really know that the universe had a beginning...
2nd LOT. Follow it backwards.
At some point there was 100% energy and no entropy.
The beginning.
Not to mention the fact that there are no true infinities
in space time
If there were an infinite past, you would never reach the current time.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?