Subduction Zone
Regular Member
How little you know. What makes you think that evolution cannot be tested, observed, and repeated in the hear and now?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Uh, those are operation sciences that can be tested, observed and repeated in the here and now. They have nothing to do with evolution theory. Absolutely nothing.
Uh, those are operation sciences that can be tested, observed and repeated in the here and now.
Do you think you would be punching the keys on a computer, posting messages that are sent in fractions of seconds, without the advancements made from scientific work to discover the technology to do so?
How little you know. What makes you think that evolution cannot be tested, observed, and repeated in the hear and now?
Fossils can be tested, observed, and repeated in the here and now.
DNA sequences can be tested, observed, and repeated in the here and now.
Morphology can be tested, observed, and repeated in the here and now.
All of these are used as evidence for evolution.
Fossils can be tested, observed, and repeated in the here and now.
DNA sequences can be tested, observed, and repeated in the here and now.
Morphology can be tested, observed, and repeated in the here and now.
All of these are used as evidence for evolution.
Not all of the way back, nor it is there any need to.That doesn't mean you can daisy chain it back to abiogenesis, exclusive.
Show me a test where you change a fish into a tetrapod and we can then observe evolution.
But you can't test missing links, can you?
You have to bridge them on paper, don't you?
And the video continues here. She also gets into the next book that gradyll referred to:
Eugenie Scott on ID, Creationism and Dover 6of7 - YouTube
Show me a test where you change a fish into a tetrapod and we can then observe evolution. (Using only natural means of course. No intelligent intervention.)
I don't have volume but I doubt she has much to say about that later book.
It would, if what he had for breakfast was a requirement for conviction.Does what a murderer had for breakfast 20 years ago have any bearing in his murder trial?
What features? it's a missing link.You most assuredly can. You can repeatedly measure their features, such as femur lenght or cranium size. These can be used to test hypotheses.
What features? it's a missing link.
Why are there missing links?
I go with the term "missing," because it isn't there.How do you determine if it is still missing, and what is it supposed to be linking?
Every one you find would generate two more missing links, albeit the sum total of the two gaps would be less (by one) than the single gap before the find.Why do we find them so that they are no longer missing?
Not according to the #1 Christian in the world. He says that if your myth is true it is true for everyone.
I go with the term "missing," because it isn't there.
As to why it isn't there, as I said, it could be because it hasn't been found yet; or because it never existed in the first place.
Kinda like my Apple Challenge.
Evidence is missing, but in my opinion, it is missing because none was generated in the first place.
Every one you find would generate two more missing links, albeit the sum total of the two gaps would be less (by one) than the single gap before the find.
That would not be evolution.
When you demand a test it has to be a reasonable test.
If you had any evidence for your side at all you might be able to be a bit more rigorous in your demands. Unfortunately for you you don't. And I really have to run. So four hours, evidence, let's go over it so you will see why we have it and you don't.
Spoiler alert, it is not evolutionists' fault that creationists have no evidence.
Loudmouth said:Do you sleep better believing that you don't need to sacrifice bulls to Zeus? Do you sleep better knowing that Santa Claus is not real so you don't have to worry about being put on his Naughty list? Or do you spend absolutely no time worrying about such foolish beliefs?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?