Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You got any other spectacular examples?
I'm an atheist, and a militant atheist when religion starts impacting on legislation.- Daniel Radcliff
G.K. Chesterton made this point: Atheism is the most daring of all dogmas, for it is the assertion of a universal negative.
G.K. Chesterton, Twelve Types (The Echo Library, Middlesex, U.K., 2008), 29.
God does not exist is a universal negative and cannot be proven.
If X does not exist we must go to the entire universe and have unlimited knowledge to find out if this is true or not. The universal negatives like atheism become unprovable as long as we remain finite, and not omniscient.
You've already demonstrated your inability to read a fairly simple microbiology paper, and a total lack of understanding of the basics of biology. Why would we waste our time? We've given you a concrete proof of evolution and it was completely over your head and you ignored it.
I think I understand what happened and it clearly was not evolution. Definitely not the type of evolution that will build a complex genetic nanomachine. It is clearly going in the wrong direction.
I am not ignoring anything. I am disagreeing that it represents evolution.
I am not the only one reading these posts so not posting more examples because of just me seems like a cop out.
Subduction Zone said:There is such a thing as a stupid question.
The analogy holds. If you had only 1000 pictures of a person over his lifetime would you say there are too many gaps and we can't tell that this is the same person from baby to adult?
It is amazing how disrespectful of evidence that a group with absolutely nothing is.
Of course if you have no evidence, if you do not know how much work was done getting that evidence, the care needed to get that evidence, I can see how you might not value this pearl of great price. If it threatens your mythology I can see why you would want to attack it.
Just remember, you are laughably wrong. We are only trying to help you.
So what part of the theory of evolution are you having trouble with? What parts don't you understand?
Subduction Zone said:There is such a thing as a stupid question.
The analogy holds. If you had only 1000 pictures of a person over his lifetime would you say there are too many gaps and we can't tell that this is the same person from baby to adult?
It is amazing how disrespectful of evidence that a group with absolutely nothing is.
Of course if you have no evidence, if you do not know how much work was done getting that evidence, the care needed to get that evidence, I can see how you might not value this pearl of great price. If it threatens your mythology I can see why you would want to attack it.
Just remember, you are laughably wrong. We are only trying to help you.
So what part of the theory of evolution are you having trouble with? What parts don't you understand?
Whatever floats your boat.
You got any other spectacular examples?
Subduction Zone said:There is such a thing as a stupid question.
The analogy holds. If you had only 1000 pictures of a person over his lifetime would you say there are too many gaps and we can't tell that this is the same person from baby to adult?
It is amazing how disrespectful of evidence that a group with absolutely nothing is.
Of course if you have no evidence, if you do not know how much work was done getting that evidence, the care needed to get that evidence, I can see how you might not value this pearl of great price. If it threatens your mythology I can see why you would want to attack it.
Just remember, you are laughably wrong. We are only trying to help you.
So what part of the theory of evolution are you having trouble with? What parts don't you understand?
The part where Energy was needed. Since you have no evidence of what energy is.
Subduction Zone said:There is such a thing as a stupid question.
The analogy holds. If you had only 1000 pictures of a person over his lifetime would you say there are too many gaps and we can't tell that this is the same person from baby to adult?
It is amazing how disrespectful of evidence that a group with absolutely nothing is.
Of course if you have no evidence, if you do not know how much work was done getting that evidence, the care needed to get that evidence, I can see how you might not value this pearl of great price. If it threatens your mythology I can see why you would want to attack it.
Just remember, you are laughably wrong. We are only trying to help you.
So what part of the theory of evolution are you having trouble with? What parts don't you understand?
The part where billions of lines of information was laid out in one genome, from nothing.
Maybe you can explain what came first disease or the ability to fight diseases with such marvels of your evolution as the immune system.
Subduction Zone said:What are you talking about?
Energy was not part of the analogy at all.
And I probably understand energy better than you do.
That's about the weakest example ever. Is it the E. Coli thing again? Certain E.Coli could already do that. Nothing new happened, in fact something was lost and they were less fit after the experiment.
I though you guys had "mountains of evidence"?
Subduction Zone said:Have I seen what?
That's right. You can tell me about energy. But you can't show it to me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?