• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Radrook

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2016
11,539
2,726
USA
Visit site
✟150,380.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Then go to this webapage:

Michael Behe Hasn't Been Refuted on the Flagellum

Now, find anywhere in the article where they state the flagellum came about through evolutionary mechanisms, and that this fact supports intelligent design.
How is that relevant to anything that I believe? I provided the link to show that the claim that his arguments concerning the Flagellum had been refuted are untrue. You are jumping suddenly into evolution. Why?
 
Upvote 0

Radrook

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2016
11,539
2,726
USA
Visit site
✟150,380.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
But that link shows you that Behe's claims HAVE been refuted!
Well, if that's the conclusion that you draw from the counterevidence then so be it. I will not waste my time going into minute details because it all ends with the same declaration of inability to see anyway so it isn't worth the trouble. Read it view it and reject it. But I won't waste my precious time in useless detailed debates.
 
Upvote 0

Radrook

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2016
11,539
2,726
USA
Visit site
✟150,380.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
But here's the amazing thing: you have not shown a SINGLE shred of evidence. For us to declare that we haven't seen any, you'd actually have to give us evidence. Which you haven't.
If you have, then prove me wrong. Put down the post number and link.
Well, maybe because my thread is meant for the edification of fellow believers in God and not intended for debating purposes with non-believers or atheists? In short, what you interpreting as an evangelizing effort is nothing of the sort.
 
Upvote 0

Radrook

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2016
11,539
2,726
USA
Visit site
✟150,380.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Then why did you post it in a part of the forum that is open to non-believers and atheists? Why didn't you post in the Christians Only section of the forum?

And you still haven't proven me wrong that you haven't provided any evidence.

Please note that Í don't have to provide atheists on this forum with explanations as to why I post in any given forum. Anything can be disqualified as evidence provided the illogical motive is strong enough.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: mnorian
Upvote 0

Radrook

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2016
11,539
2,726
USA
Visit site
✟150,380.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
It is really also as simple that I have a right to post scientifically supported threads in the science forum without being constantly hounded for doing so. If you disagree, then OK, disagree and move on. I would.
 
Upvote 0

Radrook

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2016
11,539
2,726
USA
Visit site
✟150,380.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
What about the video supports your claim? If you cant demonstrate it, you have nothing.
What exactly in the video do you disagree with? What is it about bio-nano-technology that makes you conclude that it can decide to produce information which will enable it to construct bi machinery? Where did the information come from? Lala Land? If indeed it came from your Lala Land, then who put it in Lala Land? Abio-Jennifer?
 
Upvote 0