Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You refer to the science community as if it excludes theists. So I inferred that's what you meant. Same as I saying "The theist community...." It is an all-encompassing term.When have I ever claimed such a thing? You might want to stop putting words in my mouth.
You refer to the science community as if it excludes theists. So I made inferred that's what you meant. Same as I saying "The theist community...." It is an all-encompassing term.
I disagree that a person ceases to be scientist when he infers intelligent design from what he observes in nature.That would be silly. The scientific community has both theists and atheists. But they keep their religious beliefs out of their work, that's the difference between them and creationists.
I disagree that a person ceases to be scientist when he infers intelligent design from what he observes in nature.
True, but science doesn't solely rely on observations. You actually have to back up your claims through testing. Especially, if others don't agree with the observations.
FAQ: Does intelligent design make predictions? Is it testable?True, but science doesn't solely rely on observations. You actually have to back up your claims through testing. Especially, if others don't agree with the observations.
I don't respond because there is NOTHING you can say to convince me that what is observed in nature is the result of mindless chemicals. To me the mindless genius idea is utter nonsense and the link I offered very effectively exposes it as utter nonsense despite your claims to the contrary.This link has already been exposed as junk "science": Exons, Introns, and ID
And you never respond when your claims and links are challenged.
You don't think God is smart enough to make self-assembling biological structures?I don't respond because there is NOTHING you can say to convince me that what is observed in nature is the result of mindless chemicals. To me the mindless genius idea is utter nonsense and the link I offered very effectively exposes it as utter nonsense despite your claims to the contrary.
I don't respond because there is NOTHING you can say to convince me that what is observed in nature is the result of mindless chemicals. To me the mindless genius idea is utter nonsense and the link I offered very effectively exposes it as utter nonsense despite your claims to the contrary.
This link has already been exposed as junk "science": Exons, Introns, and ID
And you never respond when your claims and links are challenged.
Speaks for itself really.I don't respond because there is NOTHING you can say to convince me ...
What is theistic evolution?You don't think God is smart enough to make self-assembling biological structures?
Telling me differently is like trying to convince me that a duck is a moose by putting fake tiny antlers on its head.
Incessant repetition of faulty reasoning isn't going to convince nor force a rational person to abandon rationality.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?