I know you were talking to pamper_lamb, but I'd like to join the conversation.
Yes, I understand the apostalic movement today. My question would be - is it scriptural? The reason I question it, is that the NT writings are our standard. If it's not in there, then it's not Biblical. All of the references to apostles in the NT refer to the 12 disciples/apostles and to Paul who was personally called by Jesus Christ for a specific purpose. There are no other apostles listed in the NT. According to the guidelines set forth in Acts 1, it is impossible for anyone to be an apostle since the first century.
You're right IamGodslittlegirl, the Bible is final the word on all spiritual experiences (2 Timothy 3:16), but I firmly believe Scripture supports apostolic ministry for today.
Certain Seminaries teach there were only twelve apostles, but Mathias replaced Judas Iscariot, and then God called Saul. That makes Saul whose name changed to Paul- the thirteenth. If there were only twelve Paul could not claim apostleship. Also, when the ministry gifts lineup is mentioned (Ephesians 4:5-6) why doesnt scripture qualify, or elaborate more on the apostle as a gift limited to twelve or thirteen? The context clearly implies no such limitation. Apostles and prophets are treated like evangelists, pastors, and teachers, without a restriction on their number. Paul mentioned false apostles would arise (2 Corinthians 11:13), and it is interesting to note how Paul defends the office (2 Corinthians 11:5, 11:13). It would have been much easier for Paul to say, "There are only twelve apostles and myself. Let me tell you their names." Instead, Paul goes through his long defense. Also, Paul says greet Adronicus and Junia who are of note among the apostles (Romans 16:7). How can these other two people be compared with the apostles unless they were associates?
Some make the claim that God's dealings with mankind change over time, and miracles arent necessary for today. Those who make that claim cant back it up from the Bible. God does not change (Malachi 3:6, James 1:17). The opposite is true; people change. When prophecy ceased in Israel before Christ's incarnation, it was because of the nation's apathy and sin. Prophets are also miracle workers, and a lack of prophets and prophecy today can only happen for the same reason. What about the two prophets that confront the Antichrist (Revelation 11:3-12)? How do they fit into the picture if miracles aren't for today?
Now it should be clear there were more than 12 or 13 apostles and that miracles haven't ceased. Any other reasoning must be bad teaching, religious tradition, or prejudice.
Ill give you this; true apostleship must not be too common otherwise more would be done in the church for the kingdom of God. I really believe apostles are starting churches all over the world today and right under our nose. Christian events simply don't seem to merit time on the BBC News. The news media knows that they give recognition to things they broadcast and it seems they'd rather talk about war.
Blessings (Isaiah 9:6-7)