Because a very large number of people are dying from it.Why waste resources on a communicable disease which is 100% preventable unless one is born with it or one intentionally goes into harm's way?
Why waste resources on a communicable disease which is 100% preventable unless one is born with it or one intentionally goes into harm's way?
Yet you made the unsupported claims that the vaccine is unsafe, has not gone through sufficient clinical testing and that it was approved based on political reasons rather than any concern about the public health.The FDA approved vioxx for kids right before it was pulled from the shelves for killing people. Quoting them as proof of safety won't cut it. Merck used aluminum in the placebo and based results of side effects on that, no one should get away with that sloppy science but the FDA allowed it. They also used a cohort that was way too small to be considered a viable size by the FDA, but it got approved anyway.
Again can you provide evidence to back up your claims that the vaccine in question is unsafeI guess I'll have a side of crow after reading those quotes, but I still think the biggest problem is making an unproven and unsafe vaccine mandatory, not making it available. I would love to see an Aids vaccine, proven safe and offered to anybody who wants it. I don't want to see one fast tracked through on shoddy science and forced on first graders "for the good of society."
You are of course referring to heart disease right?Why waste resources on a communicable disease which is 100% preventable unless one is born with it or one intentionally goes into harm's way?
Because the key word is communicable. Unless everyone starts living in a plastic bubble today AIDS will continue to spread.Why waste resources on a communicable disease which is 100% preventable unless one is born with it or one intentionally goes into harm's way?
One of my friend's sisters died from AIDS. She contracted HIV by being raped by an infected man. What should we tell her?Why waste resources on a communicable disease which is 100% preventable unless one is born with it or one intentionally goes into harm's way?
Yet you made the unsupported claims that the vaccine is unsafe, has not gone through sufficient clinical testing and that it was approved based on political reasons rather than any concern about the public health.
If you would care to support these assertions, I would be happy to read them and the studies such claims sight as evidence. Until then the evidne3ce produced by the FDA and the drug manufacturing companies stands.
Again can you provide evidence to back up your claims that the vaccine in question is unsafe
I was watching a news segment the other morning discussing AIDS awareness day. It makes me wonder if there would be an even bigger outcry over an AIDS vaccine.
Any thoughts?
An HIV vaccine will never be successful because the virus mutates too fast.
This comes from the same stable of people who oppose making condoms available in schools, as they equate arming the youth with information and protection with giving them a license to fornicate.
i pray often that God give the scientists the right mind to create the vaccine/cure and quickly.
That would be a glorious, glorious day.
I dont think there will ever be an AIDS vaccine because there is just WAY too much money tied up in AIDS research, charities, medical care etc etc.
Cure AIDS and you're sealing up a GOLD MINE and people know it.
You're editorializing. People opposed the HPV vaccine because it isn't safe, hasn't gone through nearly enough clinical trials, was approved for political reason rather than public health reasons, and is assumed to become mandatory like the other, what are they up to now - 27? vaccine shots that kids are forced to get.
Why do you automatically assume a reason for protesting must be religious disagreement? Please don't be so prejudiced.
An HIV vaccine will never be successful because the virus mutates too fast. If it is, then take the time for proper clinical trials to prove that it's safe and effective. Then assure us through law that it will never become mandatory. If that happens, you won't hear much religious opposition.
Why does the religious right love cervical cancer?
HPV vaccine is now on the Australian vaccination list... all school girls will get it if they want it before the finish High School.
Yay! No more cervical cancer!
Well.. no it won't completely eliminate it there will be a reduction in cervical cancer. It's won't protect against all forms but it makes a big dent. I don't know why nobody wants to get the boys vaccinated, the trials indicated a higher success rate in preventing HPV in the boys than in the girls. I guess since women are the ones to get cervical cancer they know they'll get a higher participation rate for young women.
whoa, hang on just a moment! are you guys saying cervical cancer can be caused by irresponsible sexual behaviour? i never knew that, i don't get that since it's supposed to be genetic?my one friend has a huge chance of getting it cos of genetics and she's probable themost conservative person you've ever met.then again, i guess you get different forms????
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?