Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
When it comes to "we're all just guessing" vs "oh no wait - God did provide a message to the church on this particular issue on which all scholars are merely guessing" -- what is "the logical" course of action in your POV?
Given that all doctrine still has to be tested sola scriptura --- of course.
Without an explicit Bible statement on some detail then a lot of "educated guessing" to get that detail is expected and "opinions may vary". Every Bible scholar in every Christian denomination already accepts that fact.
You said: "Great, show me interpretations on the Bible that Ellen White stated that you disagree with. And then we will know you test her by it."
My response: Truth is established through scripture.
So there is no misunderstanding please explain your interpretation of what you think the above statement is saying and why you used it for your OP? As posted earlier if you understand the context of the quote you provided outside of context and the definition and use of the word "race" then there is no problem with the statement as it stands therefore nothing needs to be plugged into it. You seem to be ignoring this.
Given that even Matthew Henry speaks to the topic of the "race of Cain" and given that all the races of mankind that existed 1000B.C. all came about in the same 1600 year period of time (since the flood) that the races of mankind would have had at the time of Noah in Genesis 6 since the birth of Cain -- then races are what is already known to have exists when starting from "just brothers" whether they are Cain and Seth or the sons of Noah as the "just brothers" starting point.
And yet Bible scholars when faced with possibilities spell them out and weigh the evidence.
You have said just go with Ellen White.
Name the post flood race that didn't have amalgamation. She said certain.
Bob says if it is unclear go with Ellen White.
When the Bible is not explicit that is how it is done. That is why we have groups like the "Adventist Theological Society" -- Home
So you are saying this is a "detail" someone is trying to guess at - where that detail has already been given via direct message from God??
hmmm - since you say you are interested in "what doe the Bible actually say" -- tell me this - "What does the Bible actually say we should do when some message comes to us directly from God"?? That should be a pretty easy Bible study.
Which shows the point. If all on the ark were righteous who did they marry to turn idolator?None of them had it starting with Noah - his religion was a pure one. God called him righteous. It's what happens over time from that point on that is "cause and effect" yielding "the result".
I am wondering if you are really getting the statement that even Matthew Henry gets clearly on the subject of believers marrying unbelievers from what he calls "The race of Cain".
And yet Bible scholars when faced with possibilities spell them out and weigh the evidence.
You have said just go with Ellen White.
1 John 4:1 Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world
I assume you are posting that because as an non-SDA you do not accept an SDA as a prophet that passes the 1 John 4:1 test ... and... neither should SDAs??. You realize of course that that is a circular argument . Why would one "assume" that SDAs all come to a non-SDA POV on Ellen White when it comes to 1 John 4:1 test of a prophet?
Without an explicit Bible statement on some detail then a lot of "educated guessing" to get that detail is expected and "opinions may vary". Every Bible scholar in every Christian denomination already accepts that fact.
Yes, I am. Did you get that "race of Cain" is not in Genesis 6? .
Scenario A. IF a bunch of Bible scholars were sitting in a room making "a best guess" about how many sons and daughters Adam and Eve actually had (excluding all grandchildren etc) before they died - and 10 scholars came up with 10 guesses we might argue (anyone of them could be right or none of them ).
But if God sent an Angel to tell one of the scholars "that number is 101" - then that scholar "should" change his guess to "101" - no matter what the other folks sitting around guessing -- may think of it.
- Clearly that is not a doctrine.
- IT is also not a detail (regarding the number children for Adam) - spelled out in the Bible -- although we do know that number has to be more than 5 since Cain and Seth both had wives
========================
On this thread we have two proposed responses to scenario "A" above.
1. Ignore what God just told you and stick with your original guess so you can be on a level playing field with the other guessers.
2. Go with what God tells you is the right answer and be thankful for the added help.
As all Bible scholars admit , there are a great many topics where the scholarship infers some detail based on clues from various Bible texts to come up with a detail not explicitly written in the Bible. This is not "NEW" to the world with Adventist views on those sorts of Bible details. In some cases we are left guessing with no more info than the next guy - and in a few cases we do have some added insight -- but in every case it is not a Bible doctrine.
You are possibly conflating sola-scriptura testing of all doctrine with solo-scriptura source, and in the examples you give "like authorship" you argue even more narrowly that even if evidence exists for Paul - unless the text outright says "I Paul am writing this letter" -- well then the Bible doesn't say it so it should not be believed or everyone should claim they are "just guessing" even if God sends them Word from heaven on the right answer..
You're circling back to "they should always be limited to just guessing if the Bible does not already spell that detail explicitly even if it is not on a doctrinal topic".
Admittedly when a message comes it either is from God or is not - but given the first option - what is your POV for the response of the Christian "according to the Bible"??
The question is not "a message that did not come from God" but rather when a message "did" come from God -- I think you are still avoiding that part.
And yet Bible scholars like Matthew Henry note that the "race of Cain" is the correct interpretation for "daughters of men" in Genesis 6
Which brings us once again back to --
So back to my initial question above - - "What does the Bible actually say we should do when some message comes to us directly from God"?? your answer is sort of like "view it as a non-SDA would - reject it".
Admittedly when a message comes it either is from God or is not - but given the first option - what is your POV for the response of the Christian "according to the Bible"??
The question is not "a message that did not come from God" but rather when a message "did" come from God -- I think you are still avoiding that part.
I am not avoiding it. That was my point all along. If you accept Ellen White there is no limiting factor.
But it agrees with Ellen White so you accept that as authoritative. Again you make the point.
You are back to interpretation not stated in the text.
Without an explicit Bible statement on some detail then a lot of "educated guessing" to get that detail is expected and "opinions may vary". Every Bible scholar in every Christian denomination already accepts that fact.
Scenario A. IF a bunch of Bible scholars were sitting in a room making "a best guess" about how many sons and daughters Adam and Eve actually had (excluding all grandchildren etc) before they died - and 10 scholars came up with 10 guesses we might argue (anyone of them could be right or none of them ).
But if God sent an Angel to tell one of the scholars "that number is 101" - then that scholar "should" change his guess to "101" - no matter what the other folks sitting around guessing -- may think of it.
- Clearly that is not a doctrine.
- IT is also not a detail (regarding the number children for Adam) - spelled out in the Bible -- although we do know that number has to be more than 5 since Cain and Seth both had wives
========================
On this thread we have two proposed responses to scenario "A" above.
1. Ignore what God just told you and stick with your original guess so you can be on a level playing field with the other guessers.
2. Go with what God tells you is the right answer and be thankful for the added help.
As all Bible scholars admit , there are a great many topics where the scholarship infers some detail based on clues from various Bible texts to come up with a detail not explicitly written in the Bible. This is not "NEW" to the world with Adventist views on those sorts of Bible details. In some cases we are left guessing with no more info than the next guy - and in a few cases we do have some added insight -- but in every case it is not a Bible doctrine.
You are possibly conflating sola-scriptura testing of all doctrine with solo-scriptura source, and in the examples you give "like authorship" you argue even more narrowly that even if evidence exists for Paul - unless the text outright says "I Paul am writing this letter" -- well then the Bible doesn't say it so it should not be believed or everyone should claim they are "just guessing" even if God sends them Word from heaven on the right answer..
You're circling back to "they should always be limited to just guessing if the Bible does not already spell that detail explicitly even if it is not on a doctrinal topic".
That was my point all along. If you accept Ellen White there is no limiting factor. Inspired is inspired. So you can't say Scripture is what you judge things by.
your point seems to be that when we exclude doctrinal topics - and just look at "details" that are not spelled out in the Bible (like the number of Children Adam had above 5) - then guessing is fine - but God can never tell someone the answer to that detail - because doing so would mean we have to banish all sola-scriptura testing of doctrine. That my friend is not logical.
That was my point all along. If you accept Ellen White there is no limiting factor. Inspired is inspired. So you can't say Scripture is what you judge things by.
I posted it to see how Adventists relate Ellen White's writings to the Bible. I am not sure what she meant. When I was an Adventist I examined various interpretations but did not find one that fit all the details. Apparently I am not alone on that:
“Amalgamation”: Ellen White’s Most Controversial Statement
However, since you have it figured out, fill on your definitions.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?