Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Ignoring God's instructions in genesis 1:28? be fruitful and multiply?
It's sort of creepy when an adult admits to having an invisible friend. But from an evolutionary psychology viewpoint it's fairly easy to understand. It's funny really,
Darwinism doesn't play a role in atheism just as me not being a mountaineer doesn't necessitate that my favourite pastime must be billiards.
I've seen the full story before, and it's much more in-depth and detailed than that quick blurb would suggest. And it's not some whacky thing that happened, according to his account. It was a series of events that occured during a particular time of his life, and it lead him to Jesus. Whether you or I place any weight in the story is irrelevent, because it is meaningful for him, just like many other similar stories are to the people who tell them.
Asking for his story just to ridicule it without getting the whole story wasn't necessary, nor even relevent to this thread.
It's not only fundamental it's absolutely necessary, it you can't convince yourself how can you ever expect to convince anyone else?
Its good that the role Darwinism plays in atheism is put on the table, outlined and laid bare. Rather than the concentration on the preparation, trying to imbue it on the arena first, before you unsheathe and begin taking names. It remains the same however. Man didn't come from beast, so there is no "evolutionary psychology" of ignorant beastmen. Only the creator and the implications of man being the result of a creation. You'll have more success using this trite, over used mechanism, on a "TE".
Like I told you, man was never beast. Created as man. A phenomenon which depicts the manner of man and that contingent upon and within it. Attempting to group Darwinism with rudimentary rituals like feeding doesn't endow it with the properties of same. And the conscious mind and its relation to the earth is understood without it. Science is inquiry. And in the case of the information which has been handed down the separation also persists. A separation generated through a perception on origins. One side sees that science is getting rid of ignorant beast men's tales. The other sees science catching up with an intelligence consistent with a created intelligent race. Science can be viewed without the Darwinist or the materialists interpretation. The moving blockade erected by him to prevent entry and analysis, tossed aside. The information taken. Bring those arguments you garner to the "TE". You may see your relevance rate jump."Ignorant beastmen" is a novel term. I would hazard a guess you have a distrust of any science that tries to understand human thinking. I suppose you like to imagine that your thoughts are spiritual and quite separate from your earthly body that you will one day cast aside. Unfortunately this isn't the case. Your mind spends most of its time doing what it evolved to do: work out how to get food, how to socialise and co-operate with members of your tribe and how to ensure you reproduce. Food, gossip, work and sex. Sound familiar?
Like I told you, man was never beast. Created as man. A phenomenon which depicts the manner of man and that contingent upon and within it. Attempting to group Darwinism with rudimentary rituals like feeding doesn't endow it with the properties of same. And the conscious mind and its relation to the earth is understood without it. Science is inquiry. And in the case of the information which has been handed down the separation also persists. A separation generated through a perception on origins. One side sees that science is getting rid of ignorant beast men's tales. The other sees science catching up with an intelligence consistent with a created intelligent race. Science can be viewed without the Darwinist or the materialists interpretation. The moving blockade erected by him to prevent entry and analysis, tossed aside. The information taken. Bring those arguments you garner to the "TE". You may see your relevance rate jump.
Evolution is wrong.What are you struggling to say?
Evolution is wrong.
Evolution is wrong.
Is that a moral judgement?
Every creation myth has been shown to be utterly false, and the reality so much more beautiful and magnificent.Keep telling yourself that. Testing done reveals only creationism. Speculations based on the rebuke of these results do not have to be acknowledged.
Keep telling yourself that. Testing done reveals only creationism. Speculations based on the rebuke of these results do not have to be acknowledged.
Testing done reveals only creationism.
It doesn't, huh?Every creation myth has been shown to be utterly false, and the reality so much more beautiful and magnificent.
I create an apple ex nihilo into the palm of your hand.
What evidence would you use to convince your friend I did this?
That has literally nothing to do with the text you quoted.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?