Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
ACNA seems to value to articles to some extent, but it has not come down with a particularly firm stance on them (in the same way that the Jerusalem Declaration does for example)
The calvinist tone of the articles is stronger when you read the article on Predestination in conjunction with the one on Free Will.
Here's some [friendly] food for thought for you as a Catholic:
Other than Infra/Supra Lapsarianism, what is the difference between the views of Calvin and St. Thomas Aquinas on Predestination (not other related issues, just predestination itself)?
Did you see my response?Huh, sounds like I did read something into the Articles that aren't there....so it is a Calvinistic Document. Does this jive with what regular and ACNA Anglicans believe?
Arminius himself was Reformed, he was actually a professor of Calvin's Institutes. He found the way to explain both predestination and free will, through the concept of prevenient grace. Similarly in the Catholic world, Molina found the way to reconcile predestination and free will, through the concept of middle knowledge.I always thought they were Armenian.
Did you see my response?
Arminius himself was Reformed, he was actually a professor of Calvin's Institutes. He found the way to explain both predestination and free will, through the concept of prevenient grace. Similarly in the Catholic world, Molina found the way to reconcile predestination and free will, through the concept of middle knowledge.
This is a huge controversy among the Calvinists, because to them the very concept of free will is antithetical, and so anyone who even considers free will, as both Arminius and Molina have done, have been deemed as enemies who, through free will, have denied predestination, instead of who they actually were, thinkers who reconciled free will with predestination (making both possible).
In short, the Anglican 39 Articles side with Arminius and Molina, being both for hardline predestination, and not denying free will.
Yes I read your response, Thanks....maybe I should rephrase the questions then: Do Anglicans/ACNA believe in predestination in the same sense as a Presbyterian or Reformed church member would?
As a good Anglican friend of mine often says, "depends on which Anglicans you ask!"
They're a motley crew
Jim told me he refuses to come on this board. I've told him he's the ultimate Anglican historian. But being a conservative, Anglo-Catholic, traditional dude, he took one look at STR and quickly decided he wouldn't touch it with a ten-foot cattle prod. (Little Ghostbusters reference)
My kids and I watched Ghostbusters the other day for a Halloween treat. My favorite part?...... "Symmetrical bookstacking!"
Do Anglicans/ACNA believe in predestination in the same sense as a Presbyterian or Reformed church member would?
It is an interesting historical note that after championing the Presbyterian system for most of his life, near his death Calvin became convinced that the Church of England had the upper-hand instead.
But yeah, this is true. And an interesting thing about it is that ACNA isn't really very Calvinist. There seem to be plenty of Wesleyans, but there are not as many classic Calvinists in the mix.
I agree with your point in general, but I would make the point that in the Augustinian/ Thomistic understanding one is not predestined because of the faith that they will one day hold. Rather, they have faith because they have been predestined to have it...In this way you can't say that "regular" Christianity teaches conditional election unless you are willing to exclude St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas from what could be considered "regular".
Nope. Presbyterians follow the hardened Calvinism, which really appears after the death of Calvin (interestingly, out of the struggles concerning Arminius, that had caused many Reformed to harden their positions into what became 5-point Calvinism).
I think you're going a bit far here brother. There is no single group of "Presbyterians" who all have the same confessions.
Also, keep in mind that the Westminster Confession was written for and officially accepted by English parliament for the Church of England. If not for Mr. Cromwell not liking those "filthy Scots," Anglicanism might have been quite different.
Hmmm? The Church of England was outlawed under Mr. CromwellPuritan ministers replaced bishops; the Presbyterian Constitution (under the Geneva model) was going to be the new "Church of England".
I think that might be rather unusual.
Weird. Maybe they are high church Calvinists. I know a high Baptist congregation, so I am sure anything is possible.Could be. But seriously, lots of them in DFW, even in the Episcopal Churches here. Heck, even the priest of the "Reformed Episcopal Church" that's a part of the ACNA here in Dallas is big time Anglo-Catholic, and last I heard, was trying to bring in more "high church" trappings. :o
So yeah, maybe it's just here.
Could be. But seriously, lots of them in DFW, even in the Episcopal Churches here. Heck, even the priest of the "Reformed Episcopal Church" that's a part of the ACNA here in Dallas is big time Anglo-Catholic, and last I heard, was trying to bring in more "high church" trappings. :o
So yeah, maybe it's just here.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?