• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Abortion and Infanticide

katautumn

Prodigal Daughter
May 14, 2015
7,498
157
45
Atlanta, GA
✟39,199.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Would anyone be interested in a formal debate concerning the moral permissibility of abortion and infanticide?

For the record, I view both as morally impermissible.
I really don't believe you can lump the two together into one category and debate them as being one and the same. Abortion isn't the same as infanticide.
 
Upvote 0

brightlights

A sinner
Jul 31, 2004
4,164
298
USA
✟36,362.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I really don't believe you can lump the two together into one category and debate them as being one and the same. Abortion isn't the same as infanticide.
Certainly not, but they are related. This is not to say that one is like the other, but many arguments concerning abortion directly deal with infanticide as well. I include it for technicality.
 
Upvote 0

DieHappy

and I am A W E S O M E !!
Jul 31, 2005
5,682
1,229
54
✟34,107.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I accept this debate.

but there doesn't appear to be a formal debate section for ethics & morality.

I'm pretty sure you can start an op that clearly says who can participate and what the rules are. Ask a moderator who frequents ethics to pay close attention and delete comments from someone not included in the op (I'd suggest WorldFriction/RisingMoon) and as long as you two, or you several if want a 4 or 6 way debate, stick to the rules you've established in the op, then it can stay right here and be fun for all to watch. Since there is no formal debate section, it stays right here in ethics.
 
Upvote 0

PetersKeys

Traditionalist Catholic , Paleo-conservative
Mar 4, 2008
536
36
44
✟23,376.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Not interested in a debate, but for what my opinion is worth, to me they are both murder...nothing to debate


Thats the problem with debates. opinions are just opinions. If people really want an answer they need to go to a greater authority that can speak infallibly. I prefer to agree that abortion is murder, because the Church as a whole has infallibly declared that. Since the holy spirit leads the church I know this is true. I don't need to rely on errored human wisdom.

As a whole all the bishops and Church agreed that abortion and ABC were a grave sin. So I also agree, because the holy spirit led the church to declare these things infallibly.
 
Upvote 0

morningstar2651

Senior Veteran
Dec 6, 2004
14,557
2,591
41
Arizona
✟81,649.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Not interested in a debate, but for what my opinion is worth, to me they are both murder...nothing to debate
Is it murder in the case of a tubal pregnancy? That's when the fetus grows in the fallopian tube, causing it to rupture, killing both mother and fetus.
 
Upvote 0

GrannieAnnie

Senior Veteran
Mar 27, 2007
2,581
214
74
Western Australia
✟26,313.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Is it murder in the case of a tubal pregnancy? That's when the fetus grows in the fallopian tube, causing it to rupture, killing both mother and fetus.
I'm fully aware of what a tubal pregnancy is, and no I don't think that is murder. The child would die anyway.....so to save the mother, the child must be sacrificed.
 
Upvote 0

Meshavrischika

for Thy greater honor and glory
Jun 12, 2007
20,903
1,566
OK
✟50,603.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Would anyone be interested in a formal debate concerning the moral permissibility of abortion and infanticide?

For the record, I view both as morally impermissible.
on a religious basis? if so, then I would say you are welcome to hold your beliefs... but not force them on others (I hold the same beliefs, but I also support legalization of abortion because I don't believe in legislating religious morality)
 
Upvote 0

jayem

Naturalist
Jun 24, 2003
15,429
7,166
74
St. Louis, MO.
✟426,066.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I'm fully aware of what a tubal pregnancy is, and no I don't think that is murder. The child would die anyway.....so to save the mother, the child must be sacrificed.


But how about all the gray areas? Where the pregnancy poses a definite health risk to the mother, but the outcome is uncertain. Like a woman who has a heart attack in early pregnancy (occurs in 1 of 10,000 pregnancies.) Maybe she can carry the pregnancy to delivery, but maybe not. Or a woman diagnosed with cancer. Maybe she can put off radiation or chemotherapy till after delivery. But then the cancer might progress to an incurable state. I work in health care and have personally seen hard cases like these. Doctors will do everything possible to save both mother and fetus, but there's never any guarrantee. Would it really be morally wrong for an ill woman to terminate a pregnancy if it will provide a better chance of successfully recovering from a grave illness?
 
Upvote 0

Meshavrischika

for Thy greater honor and glory
Jun 12, 2007
20,903
1,566
OK
✟50,603.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
But how about all the gray areas? Where the pregnancy poses a definite health risk to the mother, but the outcome is uncertain. Like a woman who has a heart attack in early pregnancy (occurs in 1 of 10,000 pregnancies.) Maybe she can carry the pregnancy to delivery, but maybe not. Or a woman diagnosed with cancer. Maybe she can put off radiation or chemotherapy till after delivery. But then the cancer might progress to an incurable state. I work in health care and have personally seen hard cases like these. Doctors will do everything possible to save both mother and fetus, but there's never any guarrantee. Would it really be morally wrong for an ill woman to terminate a pregnancy if it will provide a better chance of successfully recovering from a grave illness?
not at all.
 
Upvote 0

jayem

Naturalist
Jun 24, 2003
15,429
7,166
74
St. Louis, MO.
✟426,066.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Would anyone be interested in a formal debate concerning the moral permissibility of abortion and infanticide?

For the record, I view both as morally impermissible.


You do recognize the difference between morality and legality? Some things may be morally wrong, but for various reasons, may not be prosecutable offenses, or even civilly tortious under the law.

So, regarding elective abortion, are you arguing only morality, or morality and legality?
 
Upvote 0