Akita Suggagaki
Well-Known Member
- Jul 20, 2018
- 10,277
- 7,362
- 70
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
We already do and many prefer to believe lies.I propose that we allow the American people themselves the ability and the right to determine for themselves who is telling truth and lies.
Debate moderators, just like anyone else in the media that calls themselves journalists, should not be placing their thumb on the scale in order to influence any election.because they've got such a good track record on that subject...
It certainly can be if the debate is structured as such.
Nevertheless, no matter who a person decides to vote for, they should be allowed to make up their minds for themselves without the biased influence of biased journalists and moderators.We already do and many prefer to believe lies.
Moderators should not be biased but should also hold both candidates to the truth.Nevertheless, no matter who a person decides to vote for, they should be allowed to make up their minds for themselves without the biased influence of biased journalists and moderators.
Pointing out somebody lied isn't bias.Nevertheless, no matter who a person decides to vote for, they should be allowed to make up their minds for themselves without the biased influence of biased journalists and moderators.
It is if one doesn't do it fairly on both sides, and it is if what the moderator thinks is a lie really is not a lie.Pointing out somebody lied isn't bias.
Did Harris lie? If so, then she is a liar.To be fair Mr trump is world renowned for his telling of lies. Having a list of the ones he normally trots out is just good preparation.
Debate moderators, just like anyone else in the media that calls themselves journalists, should not be placing their thumb on the scale in order to influence any election.
You should be clear if you want to defraud and/or improperly influence some election officials, hide hush money payments to your girlfriend so as to not tank your campaign, spread a bunch of bigotry and hate, run a fraudulent for-profit "university", or run a business that affords foreign agents the ability to line your pockets while you're in office.Just trying to figure out the new rules now that we've thrown all morality out the window...
You should be clear if you want to defraud and/or improperly influence some election officials, hide hush money payments to your girlfriend so as to not tank your campaign, spread a bunch of bigotry and hate, run a fraudulent for-profit "university", or run a business that affords foreign agents the ability to line your pockets while you're in office
That's nice. I didn't know we were talking about her.This video taped declaration clearly shows she purjured herself under oath.
She should be charged because that's a crime, and the case thrown out with prejudice.
That's nice. I didn't know we were talking about her.
That's what it looked like the comment I replied to was talking about.
If you don't want independent conclusions as to what is being said
I gave five characteristics of Person A. You claim to have inferred that I was talking about Person B, about which zero of the characteristics apply. How should I be more clear? Should I go to six characteristics? Seven? Ten?be more clear.
I also pointed out I hadn't realized this was included in the debate, but I could be wrong,
I fully admit I was at the time fairly shocked at the lies being spewed forth by both Kamala and her handler's... Oops, sorry, debate moderators who thought they were in the debate themselves.
Yeah, they used to have two people who tried to act mature, instead of just one.Have you ever seen a presidential debate prior to the CCP capture of our institutions? They were very different.
No she didn't. From your own link:ABC Moderator Linsey Davis Admits: 'Fact-checking' Was Only Planned for Trump
ABC News' Linsey Davis admitted that the plan was only to fact-check Trump, and not Harris, because of perceptions CNN was too nice to him.www.breitbart.com
ABC News’ Linsey Davis, one of two moderators for last week’s presidential debate, admitted to the Los Angeles Times that the plan was only to fact-check former President Donald Trump, and not Vice President Kamala Harris.
Harris told plenty of lies, too.To be fair Mr trump is world renowned for his telling of lies. Having a list of the ones he normally trots out is just good preparation.
A debate moderator would always be biased with their own political persuasion.I propose that we allow the American people themselves the ability and the right to determine for themselves who is telling truth and lies. That is NOT the job of a debate moderator.
Well…she’s shown that she lies.And?
And I responded.No she didn't. From your own link:
'the decision to attempt to correct the candidates'...
That's plural. Both of them.
Edit: I see that it's already been pointed out by @iluvatar5150.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?