Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Abandoning Darwinism: Three Scientists Discuss Why They Have
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ophiolite" data-source="post: 74391962" data-attributes="member: 234799"><p>I understood it was a quote, so I should not have characterised it as "your" remark. (Sloppiness on my part.) Nevertheless I assumed, since you quoted it and since you found the videos arguments "compelling", that you had "taken ownership" of it. The bottom line is that Meyer's article's peer reviewed credentials have been seriously questioned.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ophiolite, post: 74391962, member: 234799"] I understood it was a quote, so I should not have characterised it as "your" remark. (Sloppiness on my part.) Nevertheless I assumed, since you quoted it and since you found the videos arguments "compelling", that you had "taken ownership" of it. The bottom line is that Meyer's article's peer reviewed credentials have been seriously questioned. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Abandoning Darwinism: Three Scientists Discuss Why They Have
Top
Bottom