Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
A workable compromise on "universal" firearm background checks.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Daniel Martinovich" data-source="post: 74201967" data-attributes="member: 293934"><p>A civil war is not on my radar. Even if it was it would primarily be fought by units of the militarily on either side. It would not be fought by gun owners agaisnt the US military. Obviously the fight would spread down to the general population eventually.</p><p></p><p>A population armed with hand guns is primarily for personal defense of yourself and those around you. Having an AR-15 type weapon is defense against civil unrest.</p><p>When the mobs come to your front door. a handgun will just get you killed. Seen plenty of examples of that over the years in the USA with riots. A mob usually will not even think of rushing people carrying big scary looking weapons. The cost is way more than they are willing to pay.</p><p></p><p>Just for you info by the way. Civil unrest and the unleashing of mobs have been a favorite tool of dictators to take over a nation for...well 6000 years now? If the USA ever had a civil war. The unleashing of mobs would be a major precursor to it. It certainly seems we came close to some mobs being unleashed after the last election did it not?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Daniel Martinovich, post: 74201967, member: 293934"] A civil war is not on my radar. Even if it was it would primarily be fought by units of the militarily on either side. It would not be fought by gun owners agaisnt the US military. Obviously the fight would spread down to the general population eventually. A population armed with hand guns is primarily for personal defense of yourself and those around you. Having an AR-15 type weapon is defense against civil unrest. When the mobs come to your front door. a handgun will just get you killed. Seen plenty of examples of that over the years in the USA with riots. A mob usually will not even think of rushing people carrying big scary looking weapons. The cost is way more than they are willing to pay. Just for you info by the way. Civil unrest and the unleashing of mobs have been a favorite tool of dictators to take over a nation for...well 6000 years now? If the USA ever had a civil war. The unleashing of mobs would be a major precursor to it. It certainly seems we came close to some mobs being unleashed after the last election did it not? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
A workable compromise on "universal" firearm background checks.
Top
Bottom