Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
A workable compromise on "universal" firearm background checks.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Daniel Martinovich" data-source="post: 74201892" data-attributes="member: 293934"><p>No, if there is no gun registration list. Then to confiscate guns it means they have to go door to door to every household in America and conduct a search. That means 50% of Americans who don't own guns and would like to see them confiscated would have their basic rights violated too. The Jack booted thugs would be treating them exactly the same way their political opponents who have guns are treated. </p><p></p><p>If the government has a list. Then the 50% of the population that is for the mass confiscations are not affected by the jack booted thugs. The thugs are only raiding and abusing their political opponents whom they hate anyway. Rather simplistic but see the difference?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Daniel Martinovich, post: 74201892, member: 293934"] No, if there is no gun registration list. Then to confiscate guns it means they have to go door to door to every household in America and conduct a search. That means 50% of Americans who don't own guns and would like to see them confiscated would have their basic rights violated too. The Jack booted thugs would be treating them exactly the same way their political opponents who have guns are treated. If the government has a list. Then the 50% of the population that is for the mass confiscations are not affected by the jack booted thugs. The thugs are only raiding and abusing their political opponents whom they hate anyway. Rather simplistic but see the difference? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
A workable compromise on "universal" firearm background checks.
Top
Bottom