Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
A workable compromise on "universal" firearm background checks.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Silverback" data-source="post: 74201047" data-attributes="member: 417258"><p>I think the gun confiscation argument is a bit over played, I do understand their concern though. </p><p></p><p>I think if a Democrat is elected, there will be a host of gun regulations proposed. I think an assault weapons ban is likely, and what assault weapons people have will be grandfathered but will have to be registered as part of the legislation.</p><p></p><p>Once that is done, and shootings continue, and the registered weapons will be confiscated.</p><p></p><p>But the shootings will still continue, which will lead to a complete ban of all semi automatic weapons and a buy back program. This could have some effect on mass shootings, but typical murders, and suicides committed with firearms will remain largely unchanged. </p><p></p><p>Handguns are the issue, as 90% of shooting deaths are caused by them, both murders, and suicides (accidental, and negligent deaths as well)</p><p></p><p>If people were fairly compensated, and the penalties robust enough for non compliance, a buyback program could go a long way to helping the situation, but you will never get them all.</p><p></p><p>The writing is on the wall, it's just a matter of time if a Democrat is elected to office. All semiautomatic weapons, handguns, and weapons that use a detachable magazine will get the axe.</p><p></p><p>Our goal should be to get President Trump re-elected, and keep the majority in the Senate.</p><p></p><p>But then, how far do you compromise? The goal of the left is to take every single firearm. Which will leave COPS, the military, and criminals armed. The Hells Angles, Crips, and Latin Kings will not turn on their firearms, nor will they register them.</p><p></p><p>It took the COPS "three" Minutes to get the Walmart in El Paso, and look at the carnage, all that was left to do is wash the walls. </p><p></p><p>There are one million home invasions annually, 60% of all sexual assaults happen during home invasions...what do you do? People who know the population is disarmed will just rape, and kill with impunity. But the politicians all have armed security, so they don't care.</p><p></p><p>The Government does not care about you, the COPS don't care either, and neither will help you</p><p></p><p>Good for thought</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Silverback, post: 74201047, member: 417258"] I think the gun confiscation argument is a bit over played, I do understand their concern though. I think if a Democrat is elected, there will be a host of gun regulations proposed. I think an assault weapons ban is likely, and what assault weapons people have will be grandfathered but will have to be registered as part of the legislation. Once that is done, and shootings continue, and the registered weapons will be confiscated. But the shootings will still continue, which will lead to a complete ban of all semi automatic weapons and a buy back program. This could have some effect on mass shootings, but typical murders, and suicides committed with firearms will remain largely unchanged. Handguns are the issue, as 90% of shooting deaths are caused by them, both murders, and suicides (accidental, and negligent deaths as well) If people were fairly compensated, and the penalties robust enough for non compliance, a buyback program could go a long way to helping the situation, but you will never get them all. The writing is on the wall, it's just a matter of time if a Democrat is elected to office. All semiautomatic weapons, handguns, and weapons that use a detachable magazine will get the axe. Our goal should be to get President Trump re-elected, and keep the majority in the Senate. But then, how far do you compromise? The goal of the left is to take every single firearm. Which will leave COPS, the military, and criminals armed. The Hells Angles, Crips, and Latin Kings will not turn on their firearms, nor will they register them. It took the COPS "three" Minutes to get the Walmart in El Paso, and look at the carnage, all that was left to do is wash the walls. There are one million home invasions annually, 60% of all sexual assaults happen during home invasions...what do you do? People who know the population is disarmed will just rape, and kill with impunity. But the politicians all have armed security, so they don't care. The Government does not care about you, the COPS don't care either, and neither will help you Good for thought [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
A workable compromise on "universal" firearm background checks.
Top
Bottom