Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
A simple test for the EU people. (2)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Seipai" data-source="post: 65039585" data-attributes="member: 345951"><p>I have returned handwave for handwave. Michael will not argue his beliefs dispassionately. He has been kicked off of more than one website for his behavior. </p><p></p><p>He won't even discuss the websites that debunk his beliefs.</p><p></p><p></p><p>And lastly he is not afraid to spread falsehoods.</p><p></p><p>His beliefs have never caught on and he does not want to discuss why they have been rejected by scientists. The sites of those very scientists he claims are not "published", but since I or anyone else can quote from them shows that not to be the case. He does not understand what the word "published" means. He wants something that does not exist. He wants a peer reviewed article that debunks an idea that never caught on. Scientists have better things to do and such an article will not be found. The fact is that some of those scientists are willing to discuss why his ideas have not caught on. He calls those "hater sites".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Seipai, post: 65039585, member: 345951"] I have returned handwave for handwave. Michael will not argue his beliefs dispassionately. He has been kicked off of more than one website for his behavior. He won't even discuss the websites that debunk his beliefs. And lastly he is not afraid to spread falsehoods. His beliefs have never caught on and he does not want to discuss why they have been rejected by scientists. The sites of those very scientists he claims are not "published", but since I or anyone else can quote from them shows that not to be the case. He does not understand what the word "published" means. He wants something that does not exist. He wants a peer reviewed article that debunks an idea that never caught on. Scientists have better things to do and such an article will not be found. The fact is that some of those scientists are willing to discuss why his ideas have not caught on. He calls those "hater sites". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
A simple test for the EU people. (2)
Top
Bottom