Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
A simple calculation shows why evolution is impossible
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stevevw" data-source="post: 74356539" data-attributes="member: 342064"><p>My big deal is just like for anything that seems to have some pretty amazing coincidences or odds for something to happen where I would raise an eye brow or two. It is not a loaded statement if non-religious people use the same expressions like those that I have posted. It just reflects how surprising and unusual it appears. AS mentioned I am not a creationist and have stated several times we cannot verify God through science. Though I think some case can be made for some indirect support for a creative agent with fine tuning so can there be for a multiverse and that is what non-creationists and non-religious people also think are the two many logical conclusions when looking at this topic.</p><p></p><p>After-all several scientists like Stephen Hawking, Hoyle and Weinberg who are atheists say they can understand how people can conclude that there may be some divine influence involved though they do not believe in one. What I find just as ironic as people saying that creationists will make a big deal out of the fine tuning is that some non-religious people want to minimize it and make out it is nothing which is also a bit of an exaggeration.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stevevw, post: 74356539, member: 342064"] My big deal is just like for anything that seems to have some pretty amazing coincidences or odds for something to happen where I would raise an eye brow or two. It is not a loaded statement if non-religious people use the same expressions like those that I have posted. It just reflects how surprising and unusual it appears. AS mentioned I am not a creationist and have stated several times we cannot verify God through science. Though I think some case can be made for some indirect support for a creative agent with fine tuning so can there be for a multiverse and that is what non-creationists and non-religious people also think are the two many logical conclusions when looking at this topic. After-all several scientists like Stephen Hawking, Hoyle and Weinberg who are atheists say they can understand how people can conclude that there may be some divine influence involved though they do not believe in one. What I find just as ironic as people saying that creationists will make a big deal out of the fine tuning is that some non-religious people want to minimize it and make out it is nothing which is also a bit of an exaggeration. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
A simple calculation shows why evolution is impossible
Top
Bottom