Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
A simple calculation shows why evolution is impossible
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stevevw" data-source="post: 74356290" data-attributes="member: 342064"><p>Yes and I am not even mentioning anything about God being the cause of fine tuning and there is a lot of resistance like if anyone acknowledges it they will also have to acknowledge God. I have stated that trying to link God to fine tuning is another issue that has no verification.</p><p></p><p>But here's another point, many people bring up a creative agent or a multiverse as possible causes and no one thinks it is a big deal when discussing the issue on the many sites on the subject as these two ideas are logical ones that can be considered. Both do not have direct support but only a multiverse is entertained as real possible cause by scientists. In fact it is used as an alternative to fine tuning. I don't think there is anything wrong with suggesting that a creative agent could be one alternative to fine tuning and you don't have to be a creationists to suggest this.</p><p></p><p>It seems that the argument gets polarized into those who reject fine tuning altogether or they are called creationists when even non-religious people think the fine tuning points to a possible creative agent behind things. Hoyle was an atheist and he stated “<span style="color: #00b3b3"><em>A commonsense interpretation of the facts suggests that a super intellect has monkeyed with physics. </em></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stevevw, post: 74356290, member: 342064"] Yes and I am not even mentioning anything about God being the cause of fine tuning and there is a lot of resistance like if anyone acknowledges it they will also have to acknowledge God. I have stated that trying to link God to fine tuning is another issue that has no verification. But here's another point, many people bring up a creative agent or a multiverse as possible causes and no one thinks it is a big deal when discussing the issue on the many sites on the subject as these two ideas are logical ones that can be considered. Both do not have direct support but only a multiverse is entertained as real possible cause by scientists. In fact it is used as an alternative to fine tuning. I don't think there is anything wrong with suggesting that a creative agent could be one alternative to fine tuning and you don't have to be a creationists to suggest this. It seems that the argument gets polarized into those who reject fine tuning altogether or they are called creationists when even non-religious people think the fine tuning points to a possible creative agent behind things. Hoyle was an atheist and he stated “[COLOR=#00b3b3][I]A commonsense interpretation of the facts suggests that a super intellect has monkeyed with physics. [/I][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
A simple calculation shows why evolution is impossible
Top
Bottom