Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
History & Genealogy
A short explaination of the human-nature
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Derf" data-source="post: 77435587" data-attributes="member: 436903"><p>Why do you say that?</p><p></p><p>Assuming that the dating techniques could be relied upon for such short ages, which most can't., as I've already pointed out.</p><p></p><p>Where do I go from here? If radiometric dating is unreliable for short time frames (giving millions of years of age in cases where the ages are known to be less than one or two hundred, as an example), then the next thing to attempt would be to use the shorter time frame dating techniques, such as carbon14. You say it's useless, but why would one think it is useless? Isn't it because of the assumption of long ages? So there's a prediction from your side...that no measurable C14 would be detectable in dinosaur bones, right?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Derf, post: 77435587, member: 436903"] Why do you say that? Assuming that the dating techniques could be relied upon for such short ages, which most can't., as I've already pointed out. Where do I go from here? If radiometric dating is unreliable for short time frames (giving millions of years of age in cases where the ages are known to be less than one or two hundred, as an example), then the next thing to attempt would be to use the shorter time frame dating techniques, such as carbon14. You say it's useless, but why would one think it is useless? Isn't it because of the assumption of long ages? So there's a prediction from your side...that no measurable C14 would be detectable in dinosaur bones, right? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
History & Genealogy
A short explaination of the human-nature
Top
Bottom