Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
A series of questions for those against evolution
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="william jay schroeder" data-source="post: 10722276" data-attributes="member: 27329"><p>I think it is more you needing to prove it is billions of years old. all your science doesnt prove anything but creation. you all make it very simple when facts show it is extremly complex and interrelated. math shows it to be highly unlikely. the odds of many assumtions are stagering. the mutations mammals to reptiles or vice versa ape to man what came first plant life or animals. weather change had to come and go actually the same speeds as evolution. what of plants that need a specific animal to produce or reproduce. they would have to evolve the exact same time. If one spot in evolution is proven wrong the whole thing goes down hill. evolution needs constant weather. didnt happen. the mamoths the coal deposits in the artic circle. they happened suddenly, So a catastrophic event did happen. were is this in evolution.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="william jay schroeder, post: 10722276, member: 27329"] I think it is more you needing to prove it is billions of years old. all your science doesnt prove anything but creation. you all make it very simple when facts show it is extremly complex and interrelated. math shows it to be highly unlikely. the odds of many assumtions are stagering. the mutations mammals to reptiles or vice versa ape to man what came first plant life or animals. weather change had to come and go actually the same speeds as evolution. what of plants that need a specific animal to produce or reproduce. they would have to evolve the exact same time. If one spot in evolution is proven wrong the whole thing goes down hill. evolution needs constant weather. didnt happen. the mamoths the coal deposits in the artic circle. they happened suddenly, So a catastrophic event did happen. were is this in evolution. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
A series of questions for those against evolution
Top
Bottom