- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,200
- 52,658
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No comment.Then why do I see so many creationists trying to use the first law of thermodynamics to "disprove" the big bang?
Indeed!
That's exactly what God started with -- nothing!
That's why it's called creatio ex nihilo.
The backbone of creationism is that God created the universe from nothing.
Would it matter?
You'd just call it semantics, doublethink and weaseling; wouldn't you?
And if creationists would only stick to that, and not add the products of their own ego into the mix, nobody would ever mistake creationism for a "challenge" to evolutionary theory.
Correct no answer would ever satisfy an unbeliever. The problem with them is that they have a very narrow minded world view and if something doesnt fit into that criteria they will attack.
They dont understand that there is lots of evidence there that supports the christian worldview but what they want is to know without a shadow of a doubt, but what they dont understand is God will never give them that because if no faith is required, then no love is required.
Ask an unbeliever if they believe that their parents are really their parents and their hypocrisy will show so clearly. If they answer the dna matches, I can say that someone could have faked the dna tests, your parents could have been cloned by a technology that we dont know about yet, aliens could have cloned them for another purpose, or aliens could have cloned them for amusement. This is called irrational skepticism and if someone wants to make it so, no answer will ever satisfy them.
Why do you think unbelievers score so high on the asperger quotient test, thsi is also why most are known to be socially inept, and have a very narrow worldview.
Funny how that seems to fit the more outspoken creationists here. Also, how much more narrow minded can you get than "the only answer is the one based on my personal interpretation of the KJV1611 bible?"Correct no answer would ever satisfy an unbeliever. The problem with them is that they have a very narrow minded world view and if something doesnt fit into that criteria they will attack.
Sorry, but there is no evidence that supports the Christian Creationist worldview.They dont understand that there is lots of evidence there that supports the christian worldview but what they want is to know without a shadow of a doubt, but what they dont understand is God will never give them that because if no faith is required, then no love is required.
Are you claiming that not believing in your god constitutes "irrational skepticism?" How about Shiva? Or Thor? Or Allah?Ask an unbeliever if they believe that their parents are really their parents and their hypocrisy will show so clearly. If they answer the dna matches, I can say that someone could have faked the dna tests, your parents could have been cloned by a technology that we dont know about yet, aliens could have cloned them for another purpose, or aliens could have cloned them for amusement. This is called irrational skepticism and if someone wants to make it so, no answer will ever satisfy them.
Citations, please. Or is this just empty rhetoric or even worse, false witness?Why do you think unbelievers score so high on the asperger quotient test, thsi is also why most are known to be socially inept, and have a very narrow worldview.
There is a big difference between evolution and neo-darwinian evolution which from what I read has too many holes in it, and thanks to perry marshall I can truely see what they are now.
"Well, yeah, that's just like, your opinion, man."Correct no answer would ever satisfy an unbeliever. The problem with them is that they have a very narrow minded world view and if something doesnt fit into that criteria they will attack.
They dont understand that there is lots of evidence there that supports the christian worldview but what they want is to know without a shadow of a doubt, but what they dont understand is God will never give them that because if no faith is required, then no love is required.
Ask an unbeliever if they believe that their parents are really their parents and their hypocrisy will show so clearly. If they answer the dna matches, I can say that someone could have faked the dna tests, your parents could have been cloned by a technology that we dont know about yet, aliens could have cloned them for another purpose, or aliens could have cloned them for amusement. This is called irrational skepticism and if someone wants to make it so, no answer will ever satisfy them.
Why do you think unbelievers score so high on the asperger quotient test, thsi is also why most are known to be socially inept, and have a very narrow worldview.
There is a big difference between evolution and neo-darwinian evolution which from what I read has too many holes in it, and thanks to perry marshall I can truely see what they are now.
"Well, yeah, that's just like, your opinion, man."
The following information comes from Perry Marshall:
--------
1) DNA is not merely a molecule with a pattern; it is a code, a language, and an information storage mechanism.
2) All codes are created by a conscious mind; there is no natural process known to science that creates coded information.
3) Therefore DNA was designed by a mind.
If you can provide an empirical example of a code or language that occurs naturally, you've toppled my proof. All you need is one.
Perry Marshall
The backbone of creationism is that God created the universe from nothing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?