• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

A question to protestants

bbbbbbb

Well-Known Member
Jun 9, 2015
30,821
14,025
74
✟437,631.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Thanks! Is there more you like to talk about past where we left off above around post #204? (other parts of post 204 maybe? -- the most key discussion point was perhaps the last paragraph)

Actually, given the fact that the thread had been off-topic for a long time before post #204, I will return to the OP, which asked what happened to sola scriptura in light of female ordination (in some Protestant churches). The answer is that nothing has happened, other than the fact that those denominations now have completely rejected scripture as having any role to play in church polity. For those that have not rejected scripture, you will find faithful adherence on matters such as female ordination.
 
Upvote 0

Strong in Him

Great is thy faithfulness
Site Supporter
Mar 4, 2005
31,306
10,192
NW England
✟1,339,586.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

There are churches which understand, and interpret, Scripture differently on this matter, certainly - that does not mean that we have rejected Scripture completely.
 
Reactions: Paidiske
Upvote 0

~Zao~

Wisdom’s child
Site Supporter
Jun 27, 2007
3,059
957
✟145,595.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The spiritual reading of scripture has nothing to do at all with leaving out one iota of scripture. But I’m really sick of saying it so I’m not going to bother to try anymore.
 
Upvote 0

bbbbbbb

Well-Known Member
Jun 9, 2015
30,821
14,025
74
✟437,631.00
Faith
Non-Denom
There are churches which understand, and interpret, Scripture differently on this matter, certainly - that does not mean that we have rejected Scripture completely.

Quite true. There are many churches (not to mention individuals) who pick and choose which portions of Scripture are relevant to their life in twenty-first century culture.
 
Upvote 0

bbbbbbb

Well-Known Member
Jun 9, 2015
30,821
14,025
74
✟437,631.00
Faith
Non-Denom
No idea what that is. I think it’s more applied sanctification than assuming justification w/o moving forward.

That is commonly known as the Christian Scientist Church. They interpret everything in the Bible spiritually, so that they do not believe that there is anything such as physical reality.
 
Upvote 0

~Zao~

Wisdom’s child
Site Supporter
Jun 27, 2007
3,059
957
✟145,595.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
That is commonly known as the Christian Scientist Church. They interpret everything in the Bible spiritually, so that they do not believe that there is anything such as physical reality.
Sounds Gnostic Flesh at the cross to achieve sanctification is more in tune for growth.
 
Upvote 0

~Zao~

Wisdom’s child
Site Supporter
Jun 27, 2007
3,059
957
✟145,595.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Yes, they are extremely Gnostic, which is one reason I tend to be quite skeptical of a "spiritual" interpretation of holy scripture.
The teaching of Christ and the church in particular is the model. From the shadow is the introduction into Christianity as an analogy but the substance should never be hid because the higher teaching of Jesus Christ as Risen Lord should always be the focus. Not hard for anyone to figure out unless the shadow is overpowering the substance.
 
Upvote 0

bbbbbbb

Well-Known Member
Jun 9, 2015
30,821
14,025
74
✟437,631.00
Faith
Non-Denom

Quite true. That is a reason I do not reject a spiritual understanding of scripture, but am skeptical of much that is being passed off as being "spiritual" but which actually denies scripture, as with the Christian Scientists.
 
Reactions: ~Zao~
Upvote 0

Strong in Him

Great is thy faithfulness
Site Supporter
Mar 4, 2005
31,306
10,192
NW England
✟1,339,586.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Quite true. There are many churches (not to mention individuals) who pick and choose which portions of Scripture are relevant to their life in twenty-first century culture.

And there are others who are inconsistent in their approach to Scripture.
For example, some, on these forums, insist that 1 Timothy 2:12, and other Scriptures, have to be taken literally. But when they've been asked about Paul's teaching that widows under 60 deserve no financial help from the church because they are idle busybodies, 1 Timothy 5:11-15, for example, they back track and say it was only for that time. Some have said that women cannot teach men because this is what Scripture teaches. Yet when given examples of women who taught, they back track and say that telling men what God is saying is not teaching, or obeying the Great Commission to teach people everything Jesus taught comes under the heading of evangelism, so that's different, or that Priscilla taught Apollos with her husband and probably didn't actually do any of the teaching, which is an assumption.

Scriptural exegesis - studying the context, what is meant by what is written, what the circumstances were, what kind of writing it is and what the audience would have understood it to mean at the time - is important. Taking verses/passages and insisting that they be taken, and applied, literally when they were not written, or intended, to be taken literally, is actually making the Bible say something that its authors never intended.
Mind you, there are people who will look at that and say that I'm just trying to find ways around women being allowed to preach/be ordained - their approach to Scripture will not allow them to consider anything but a literal application, and they will not be able to consider that they might be wrong in their approach.
 
Reactions: ~Zao~
Upvote 0

bbbbbbb

Well-Known Member
Jun 9, 2015
30,821
14,025
74
✟437,631.00
Faith
Non-Denom

Quite true. Although many hold differing interpretations and many have great inconsistencies in their exegesis (or eisegesis in many cases) there are some, such as yourself (and I hope myself) who achieve consistency without introducing foreign concepts such as the one you mentioned that a particular aspect such as the idea that Paul was merely addressing a particular situation for that church or individual only and, therefore, the troubling verse(s) cannot apply to us today.
 
Upvote 0

Major1

Well-Known Member
Sep 17, 2016
10,551
2,837
Deland, Florida
✟211,285.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

I see that you are in a "Time Out" so you can not respond.

YES, some Christian denominations have female bishops/pastors which is completely without Bible direction or approval.

Now I have not read all the pages of this thread and I am fully aware that some people will not agree with my comments. What I am going to post is what the Bible says as I always do.

Church denominations are made up of men and women and when men and women want something bad enough, they actually do not care what the Bible says. They are going to do what they want to do no matter what. Women as Pastors is a perfect example of that kind of attitude.

1 Timothy 3:1-7 ...….
"This is a true saying, If a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work. A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach; Not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous; One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity; For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God? Not a novice, lest being lifted up with pride he fall into the condemnation of the devil. Moreover he must have a good report of them which are without; lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil."

As all can see, there is NO way to make women bishops/deacons or pastors.
The ONLY way it can be done is to ignore the Bible completely and do what you want to do.

Only MEN can Scripturally be ordained as deacons and pastors. The Bible nowhere sets forth the qualifications for a woman pastor or preacher. It is wrong to try to twist the Scriptures to allow a woman to be ordained to the gospel ministry. The ministry of preaching the gospel is a man’s job, and God qualifies those whom He calls to this very important task.

Like it or not...……..that is what the Word of God says.

Are there some women smarter than Men. LOL!!!!!!

However that is of NO concern because we all know it to be true.

So then WHY is this the case??????????

The structure of 1 Timothy 2:11–14 makes the reason why women cannot be pastors perfectly clear. Verse 13 begins with “for,” giving the “cause” of Paul’s statement in verses 11–12.

Why should women not teach or have authority over men?

Because “Adam was created first, then Eve. And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived” (verses 13–14). God created Adam first and then created Eve to be a “helper” for Adam. The order of creation has universal application in the family (Ephesians 5:22–33) and in the church.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Major1

Well-Known Member
Sep 17, 2016
10,551
2,837
Deland, Florida
✟211,285.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

As usual, your responses are well thought out and nicely said.
 
Upvote 0

Helmut-WK

Member
Nov 26, 2007
2,050
420
Berlin
✟92,781.00
Country
Germany
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
1 Timothy 3:11 doesn’t say that.

Where did you get that from?
From a theologican who knows Greek. 1.Tim 3:11 speaks of women, and is is rather unlike that wives are meant, so these women are female deacons.

PS: Made a pause, not by free will, but because of technical problems.
 
Upvote 0

Helmut-WK

Member
Nov 26, 2007
2,050
420
Berlin
✟92,781.00
Country
Germany
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Quite true. There are many churches (not to mention individuals) who pick and choose which portions of Scripture are relevant to their life in twenty-first century culture.
And there are churches that pick and distort portions of scripture in order to get the result they wish: That women can not lead a church.

The range of techniques to achieve this is broad: from overlooking what is said in Gal 3:28 to invent a male name only to state that Junia (which was definite female) was a male "Junias", because "women cannot be apostles".

On top of this: Accuse those who take the Bible as it is of "picking and distorting".
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,264
✟584,012.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
From a theologican who knows Greek. 1.Tim 3:11 speaks of women, and is is rather unlike that wives are meant, so these women are female deacons.
No, they are deaconesses. The word you are referring to simply means a servant and can, therefore, refer to either position. They have very different functions in the church. Deaconesses, for one thing, are laypersons unlike Deacons who are ordained, can administer the sacraments, read the Gospel in worship services, and so on.
 
Upvote 0

Helmut-WK

Member
Nov 26, 2007
2,050
420
Berlin
✟92,781.00
Country
Germany
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
... or that Priscilla taught Apollos with her husband and probably didn't actually do any of the teaching, which is an assumption.
... and this is an ill-founded assumption, for every time the couple is mentioned, Priska is named first, which indicates she was the leading part of them. She did at least 50% of the teaching, this is was Luke (in agreemenmt with Paul) indicates between the lines.
 
Reactions: Strong in Him
Upvote 0

Helmut-WK

Member
Nov 26, 2007
2,050
420
Berlin
✟92,781.00
Country
Germany
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
No, they are deaconesses. The word you are referring to simply means a servant
No, I referred to Γυναῖκας, and that is "women (Acc.Pl.)". I know enough Greek to check up which word is there in the original NT.

It may mean "wives", but then one would expect an expressions as "their wives".

EDIT (PS): There is no word as "deaconesses" in 1.Tim 3:11, is there a translation that interprets this way, or how did you get this idea?
 
Upvote 0