Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
A question of ERVs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="xianghua" data-source="post: 73482215" data-attributes="member: 395317"><p>no realy. see here:</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1054887/" target="_blank">Lineage-Specific Expansions of Retroviral Insertions within the Genomes of African Great Apes but Not Humans and Orangutans</a></p><p></p><p>"First, we examined the distribution of shared sites between species (<a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1054887/#st003" target="_blank">Table S3</a>). We found that the distribution is inconsistent with the generally accepted phylogeny of catarrhine primates"</p><p></p><p>"Moreover, the same exact six sites would also have had to have been deleted in the orangutan lineage if the generally accepted phylogeny is correct. Such a series of independent deletion events at the same precise locations in the genome is unlikely</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="xianghua, post: 73482215, member: 395317"] no realy. see here: [URL='https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1054887/']Lineage-Specific Expansions of Retroviral Insertions within the Genomes of African Great Apes but Not Humans and Orangutans[/URL] "First, we examined the distribution of shared sites between species ([URL='https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1054887/#st003']Table S3[/URL]). We found that the distribution is inconsistent with the generally accepted phylogeny of catarrhine primates" "Moreover, the same exact six sites would also have had to have been deleted in the orangutan lineage if the generally accepted phylogeny is correct. Such a series of independent deletion events at the same precise locations in the genome is unlikely [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
A question of ERVs
Top
Bottom