Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
yep. this is another interesting point. if these ervs are indeed so fatal (in their initial condition) then how so many of them got into the genome in the first place?
so if i will give you something that is equivalent to that situation (shared transposons that contradict the species phylogeny), you will admit that evolution is false?
Sure, stretch it over enough time and something that doesn't happen becomes routine.There have only been 80-ish endogenization events in the last 6 million years in the human lineage. About once every 75,000 years. It's hardly rampant.
Humans diverge by 1/10th of 1 % and ERVs are transposable on a prolific scale as seen with T-cells. They can crash whole immune systems, what do you think they could do to stem cells?what do you mean by that?
Sure, stretch it over enough time and something that doesn't happen becomes routine.
But if it drips every 75,000 years it could explain why no one has seen a drip in modern science, invading the human genome.Duh. Say my water faucet drips once an hour. Can i conclude that it doesnt drip if i only observe it for 15 minutes without seeing a drop?
But if it drips every 75,000 years it could explain why no one has seen a drip in modern science, invading the human genome.
Yea, we can fabricate a drip did it, you don't need a real explanation that way.Guess we just have to examine the pool developing in the sink, then, huh?
Yea, we can fabricate a drip did it, you don't need a real explanation that way.
so you are talking about most ervs that are shared between human and chimp. not about nested hiearchy. why the creation scenario is better? because only the creation scenario can explain the existence of living creatures and only the creation model can explain how ervs were made in the first place. evolution cant (we cant explain for instance how the viral genes evolved stepwise or how some creatures were able to lived before they got these ervs). this is why the creation scenario is the best explanation in this case.No. If you can come up with a better explanation for the pattern we see, then I will do so. I've already told you that a couple outliers don't refute the vast majority.
because only the creation scenario can explain the existence of living creatures and only the creation model can explain how ervs were made in the first place.
I used 14 traits. Why would that not be enough?
becuase a tipical car has about 30,000 different parts (or about 2000 "big" parts). 14 is basically nothing.
you also need to check a single company since we are talking about a single designer.
here is a try that was made by a creationist source (take a look at table 1):
Walking whales, nested hierarchies, and chimeras: do they exist? - creation.com
So? That still doesn't explain why isn't 14 enough.
because by this criteria we cant do that with biology either:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?