Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Of course ToE has been shown to be true on a number of levels. However, I think the most compelling evidence is that of the fossil record. It could not be laid out in such a manner without evolution, that is unless all those fossils just popped into existence at just the right place and time as to describe what we would expect to see in evolution.
That is easy, because our viewpoint is based upon and supported by science. Yours is not.
The claim that all of life we observe today is completely, solely, totally, only by naturalistic mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago has never been proven. That particular claim of Darwinist creationism is based on guesses and suppositions.
By single life form, does not mean an individual, rather a population of a single life form.
No, the Darwinist creationist viewpoint is based on guesses and suppositions.
The claim that all of life we observe today is completely, solely, totally, only by naturalistic mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago has never been proven. That particular claim of Darwinist creationism is based on guesses and suppositions.
Wrong, and we have independent court cases that support my claim. What do you have that supports yours? Just the rantings and ravings of creationists.
Actually it has and as soon as you pass my evidence class I will be more than happy to show you that evidence.
Explain.
"Run rabbit run, the hounds are gonna catch you. Run rabbit run, you better get away."If you can't get creationism correct, you surely have no credibility to teach any Darwinist view.
I don't view abiogenesis as a single event, nor do I see any reason why it cannot be an ongoing process.
Then don't run, learn about evidence. Learning is not painful you know. It is really a good thing so why don't you try it.Mockery certainly doesn't address the failure of Darwinist creation, does it?
It only makes you feel better about yourself.
Then don't run, learn about evidence. Learning is not painful you know. It is really a good thing so why don't you try it.
Dizredux
But why the mockery?
And I've asked for evidence for the view that all of life we've observed today is the result of only, totally, solely naturalistic mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago. I get reactions such as yours but no evidence.
Why the mockery. You invite it when you say things like natural selection, the weather, earthquakes and volcanoes are random.But why the mockery?
And I've asked for evidence for the view that all of life we've observed today is the result of only, totally, solely naturalistic mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago. I get reactions such as yours but no evidence.
Actually the term "Darwinist Creationism" is mockery.
As for evidence, I know I have posed this many times, but if you are looking for evidence look at the fossil record over the past 3.5 Ga. How did it get there without evolution?
Why the mockery. You invite it when you say things like natural selection, the weather, earthquakes and volcanoes are random.
You invite it when you keep on saying the same phrases and when asked to support your ideas you simply repeat the phrases over again.
You invite it when people try to engage you in a discussion of your ideas and you continue to repeat the same phrases again over an over.
You have been given evidence for the TOE many times and shown that it was not atheistic but refuse to listen or perhaps understand what was said.
I think perhaps the biggest reason is that you present some very out of the main stream ideas and will not consider even the possibility you might be wrong in any way.
At least that is the way I see it. Others may get different mileage.
Dizredux
Actually the term "Darwinist Creationism" is mockery.
As for evidence, I know I have posed this many times, but if you are looking for evidence look at the fossil record over the past 3.5 Ga. How did it get there without evolution?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?